 ... for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier...  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Side 74av Michigan. Supreme Court, George C. Gibbs, Randolph Manning, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, William Jennison, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Dudley Fuller, Hovey K. Clarke, John Adams Brooks, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell - 1913Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1913 - 996 sider
...resulting from the negligence of the interstate carrier by railroad, shall be "for the benefit o£ the surviving widow or husband and children of such...of the next of kin dependent upon such, employe," it expressly limits the right of recovery by the personal representative to the ibeneficiaries named,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 824 sider
...any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in any. of said jurisdictions, * * * for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier. * * *" "SEC. 3. That in all actions hereafter brought against... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 806 sider
...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, and, if none, then of such employee's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." US Comp. Stat. 1913,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1917 - 780 sider
...husband and children of such employee; and, if none, then of such employee's 244 US Opinion of the Court. parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the... | |
 | South Carolina. Supreme Court, James Sanders Guignard Richardson (Reporter), Robert Wallace Shand (Reporter), Cyprian Melanchton Efird (Reporter), William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray (Reporter), William Munro Shand (Reporter) - 1917 - 650 sider
...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, and, if none, then of such employee's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." No change was made... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1916 - 638 sider
...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee; and, if none, then of such employee's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee." 35 US Stats, at Large, 65, C. 149; passed April 22, 1908. It is quite evident that much... | |
 | 1920 - 496 sider
...provides as follows : t "Any right of action given by this act to a person suffering injury shall survive to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...then of the next of kin dependent upon such employe, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." This amendment merely provides... | |
 | 1917 - 498 sider
...19102 provides: "That any right of action given by this Act to a person suffering injury shall survive to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...such employe's parents ; and, if none, then of The construction of the Federal Employers' Liability Act, in its essentials, follows the construction given... | |
 | 1917 - 510 sider
...surviving widow or husband and children of such employe, and, if none, then of such employe's parent; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employe." In this respect the act of 1910 differs from the Arkansas statute construed in Davis v. Railway Co.,40... | |
 | 1926 - 1144 sider
...person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in any of said jurisdictions, * • * for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence,... | |
| |
