California Indians Jurisdictional Act, Volum 1U.S. Government Printing Office, 1935 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 18
Side 26
... allowed to make a recovery meas- ured by the lands they lost . Now , I am perfectly prepared to say that the recovery shall be limited to $ 1.25 per acre , because there is a long tradition of limiting the value of land in that way ...
... allowed to make a recovery meas- ured by the lands they lost . Now , I am perfectly prepared to say that the recovery shall be limited to $ 1.25 per acre , because there is a long tradition of limiting the value of land in that way ...
Side 27
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Indian Affairs. ought to be allowed to assert their right to at least the land value of $ 1.25 per acre for the land that was taken from them in this ruthless way . It seems to me that when ...
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Indian Affairs. ought to be allowed to assert their right to at least the land value of $ 1.25 per acre for the land that was taken from them in this ruthless way . It seems to me that when ...
Side 36
... allowed to do it , and I do not think it should be limited to a percentage . Even if it should result in the employ- ment of a number of attorneys , Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the Committee , the courts control the litigation that is ...
... allowed to do it , and I do not think it should be limited to a percentage . Even if it should result in the employ- ment of a number of attorneys , Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the Committee , the courts control the litigation that is ...
Side 37
... allowed , and , as I understand , he is acting in his official capacity . On the other hand , if there are Indians in California that believe that their interests would be served to better advantage by employing special counsel , it ...
... allowed , and , as I understand , he is acting in his official capacity . On the other hand , if there are Indians in California that believe that their interests would be served to better advantage by employing special counsel , it ...
Side 44
... allowed , it would be done . In the case of Martinez ( 195 U. S. 469 ) the Supreme Court declined to permit an amendment to the petition after the expiration of the statutory period bringing in a new tribe of Indians . In Barrow et al ...
... allowed , it would be done . In the case of Martinez ( 195 U. S. 469 ) the Supreme Court declined to permit an amendment to the petition after the expiration of the statutory period bringing in a new tribe of Indians . In Barrow et al ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
18 treaties 18 unratified treaties 45 Stat acre acreage affiant amended petition amount appropriations approved May 18 April 23 attorney of record authorized award bands of Indians behalf benefit BUTLER Cali California Indians CHAIRMAN claimants COLLETT COLLIER Commissioner of Indian Committee on Indian compensation contract counsel Court of Claims Department determine ELMER THOMAS employed Enabling Act enrollment entitled equitable fees filed fornia Government hearing hereby Indian Affairs Indians of California individual Indians comprised Interior J. E. Pemberton J. W. Henderson JOHN COLLIER judgment jurisdictional act legislation limitation Marion Butler matter MEANEY ment Mission Indians occupancy original petition parties passed payment petitioners present President proposed prosecution quantum meruit recognized recovery rendered Secretary Senate set-off SHIPE Sloan statement statute submitted suggested Supreme Court thereof tion treaty Indians tribes and bands tribes or bands U. S. Webb United United States Senate Washington
Populære avsnitt
Side 51 - An act authorizing the attorney general of the State of California to bring suit in the Court of Claims on behalf of the Indians of California," approved May 18, 1928 (45 Stat.
Side 42 - Official letters, papers, documents, and public records, or certified copies thereof, may be used in evidence, and the departments of the Government shall give...
Side 83 - From their very weakness and helplessness, so largely due to the course of dealing of the Federal government with them and the treaties in which it has been promised, there arises the duty of protection, and with it the power. This has always been recognized by the Executive and by Congress, and by this court, whenever the question has arisen.
Side 47 - Affairs, were transmitted with a message from the President of the United States to the Senate and were on June 7, 1852, read and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs and ordered to be printed in confidence for use in the Senate., The terms of these treaties were substantially as follows: The Indians agreed
Side 64 - Indians residing on such reservation, as the case may be, at a special election authorized and called by the Secretary of the Interior under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe.
Side 114 - Resolved, That the chief clerk of the assembly be hereby directed to transmit copies of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United States...
Side 2 - Treasury to pay the actual expenses of operating, maintaining, and keeping said works in repair, which warrants or requisitions shall be paid by the Secretary of the Treasury out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated : Provided...
Side 64 - States, with the right of either party to appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, to hear and determine all such equitable claims of said Indians against the United States and to render final decree thereon.
Side 65 - Sec. 1. In the event that congress of the United States by legislation has heretofore or may hereafter authorize the attorney general of this state to institute a suit or suits in the court of claims in behalf of the Indians of the State of California, the attorney general is hereby authorized with the approval of the governor of this state to cause suit or suits to be instituted and to employ special counsel to assist in the prosecution of...
Side 64 - The amount of any judgment shall be placed in the Treasury of the United States to the credit of the Indians of California and shall draw interest at the rate of 4 per centum per annum and shall be thereafter subject to appropriation by Congress for educational, health, industrial, and other purposes for the benefit of said Indians, including the purchase of lands and building of homes...