Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Act of Parliament action adopted amount authorities Bank Bank of England bankruptcy bimetallism Board of Trade buying and selling capital carried CHAPTER charges coinage coins competition consequences contract courts of law dealings debtor debts dividend duty effect enforce England English enterprise evil existing favour foreign freedom function give gold sovereign hands important interest interference investments joint-stock companies legislature limited London manufacture ment mercantile mercantile law merchant merchant navy metric system monopoly municipal nations obligation officers operations Parliament parties patent pemmican persons port Post-Office Postal Orders Postmaster-General practice prevent principle produce profit protection provisions purchase purpose railway companies rates regulations relations remedy restrictions rules sellers ship shipowner silver Spencer Walpole standard of value statute supply taxes tion traffic turnpike trusts undertakings United Kingdom Vict weights and measures whilst
Side 73 - ... may be placed the greater publicity and more active discussion and comment, to be expected in free countries with regard to affairs in which the general government takes part. The defects, therefore, of government management do not seem to be necessarily much greater, if necessarily greater at all, than those of management by joint-stock.
Side 73 - ... the inexpediency of concentrating in a dominant bureaucracy, all the skill and experience in the management of large interests, and all the power of organized action, existing in the community; a practice which keeps the citizens in a relation to the government like that of children to their guardians, and is a main cause of the inferior capacity for political life which has hitherto characterized the over-governed countries of the Continent, whether with or without the forms of representative...
Side 75 - ... association to levy any tax they chose, for their own benefit, on all the malt produced in the country, or on all the cotton imported into it. To make the concession for a limited time is generally justifiable, on the principle which justifies patents for inventions : but the state should either reserve to itself a reversionary property in snch public works, or should retain, and freely exercise, the right of fixing a maximum of fares and charges, and, from time to time, varying that maximum.
Side 73 - ... the danger of unnecessarily swelling the direct power and indirect influence of government, and multiplying occasions of collision between its agents and private citizens; and the inexpediency of concentrating in a dominant bureaucracy all the skill and experience in the management of large interests, and all the power of organized action, existing in the community; a practice which keeps the citizens in a relation to the government like that of children to their guardians...
Side 73 - The true reasons in favour of leaving to voluntary associations all such things as they are competent to perform, would exist in equal strength if it were certain that the work itself would be as well or better done by public officers.
Side 138 - The first step must be to rid our minds of the idea that there are any such things in social matters as abstract rights.
Side 74 - ... prevented from existing. I have already more than once adverted to the case of the gas and water companies, among which, though perfect freedom is allowed to competition, none really takes place, and practically they are found to be even more irresponsible, and unapproachable by individual complaints, than the government. There are the expenses without the advantages of plurality of agency ; and the charge made for services which cannot be dispensed with, is, in substance, quite as much compulsory...
Side 88 - The principle of limitation of dividend is in itself faulty. So long as the charge is not too high, the public have no interest in the reduction of dividend. Their interest is in the reduction of price, which is a totally different thing. The fallacy lies in supposing that what is taken from the shareholders necessarily goes into the pocket of the consumer. It does no such thing; it is probably wasted in extravagances, which the company have no motive whatever in reducing.