 It is here urged in his behalf that there was no proof to sustain the charge of conspiracy, and therefore the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. At the time of his arrest, in March, 1918, Villers was the assistant postmaster...  The Federal Reporter - Side 731919Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1910 - 726 sider
...SD Childs & Co., a corporation, the appellant, in an action of the first class. It is contended that the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant, and the question being whether there was evidence which, if believed by the jury, would sustain a verdict... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1878 - 858 sider
...Braunstein v. Accidental Death Insurance Co., 1 B. & S. 782 ; 1 Green! . Evid., sect. 2. The court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff's case. 2 Greenl. Evid., sects. 372, 373; Bliss, Life Ins. (2d ed.), sect. 367;... | |
 | 1919 - 2026 sider
...Philippi, W. Va., for the United States. Before KNAPP and WOODS, Circuit Judges, and ROSE, District Judge. KNAPP, Circuit Judge. Villers, plaintiff in...Villers. Called as a witness for the government, Klacko testified to buying whisky from Villers for himself, and also for one Lazovich, a fellow countryman,... | |
 | 1913 - 1134 sider
...Error has been assigned: (1) That the trial judge erred in refusing to grant a nonsuit; (2) that he erred In refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant at the close of the case; and (3) that he erred In admitting certain evidence on the trial. [I] The motions... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1920 - 676 sider
...HAET, J., (after stating the facts). The principal question presented for our consideration is whether the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. It is contended that plaintiff was at most a licensee to whom the defendant owed no duty except to... | |
 | 1913 - 1288 sider
...never knew of the death of nine brothers and sisters who died in infancy. [2] I am of the opinion that the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. The misrepresentations made by the insured were concerning matters vital to the risk and rendered the... | |
 | South Dakota. Supreme Court - 1917 - 794 sider
...them in assuming that payee was the agent of plaintiff; there being no proof of actual agency. That therefore, the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for plaintiff, 37 SD 56, 156 NW 583, reversed. Bank v. Markwood, 437. PAYMENT FOR MEDICINE. See, Intoxicating... | |
 | 1897 - 1016 sider
...action of the court. The fifth error assigned can best be considered at this point. It is that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant at the close of all the evidence. In support of this motion the entire facts of the case have been elaborately... | |
 | 1904 - 1284 sider
...Is that of the fellow servant who placed the tie too near the track; and it follows, therefore, that the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. Judgment reversed and a new trial granted. The other Justices concurred. GRIMM v. SECRETARY OF STATE.... | |
| |
