...caused by them. 5. If the operator proves that the nuclear damage resulted wholly or partially from an act or omission done with intent to cause damage by the individual who suffered the damage, the competent courts mav exonerate the operator wholly or partially...

...wholly or partially from his liability if he proves that the damage resulted wholly or partially from an act or omission done with intent to cause damage by the person who suffered the damage, or from the latter's negligence. When two or more ships have caused the damage,...

...conflict? 6. The Convention exempts liability if "pollution damage resulted wholly or partially from an act or omission done with intent to cause damage by the person who suffered damage or from the negligence of the person . . ." Could this preclude vessel destruction...

...function. 3. If the owner proves that the pollution damage resulted wholly or partially either from an act or omission done with intent to cause damage by the person who suffered the damnge or from the negligence of that person, the owner may be exonerated wholly or...

...compensation, is to be submitted to conciliation at the retne quest of any of the Parties concerned, or if conciliation does not succeed, to arbitration,...suffering damage, or (d) negligence of a government. Thi; Convention does not apply to warships or other ships owned or operated by a State and in use only...

...function. 3. If the owner proves that the pollution damage resulted wholly or partially either from an act or omission done with intent to cause damage by the person who suffered the damage or from the negligence of that person, the owner may be exonerated wholly or...

...Convention provides : If the owner proves that the pollution damage resulted wholly or partially either from an act or omission done with intent to cause damage by the person who suffered the damage or from the negligence of that person, the owner may be exonerated wholly or...

...pollution, damage may be reduced proportionally to the extent the owner proves that the damage was caused by an act or omission done with intent to cause damage by the claimant or by the claimant's negligence. The Section provides that a ship owner may limit his liability...

...imposed unless the owner can prove that the damage resulted from (a) an act of war, other hostilities or a natural phenomenon of an exceptional, inevitable...and irresistable character, (b) an act or omission of another done with intent to cause damage, (c) negligence of the party suffering the damatre, or...

...function. 3. If the owner proves that the pollution damage resulted wholly or partially either from an act or omission done with intent to cause damage by the person who suffered the damage or from the negligence of that person, the owner may be exonerated wholly or...