United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 308U.S. Government Printing Office, 1940 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 72
Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court. Argument for Petitioner . 308 U.S. with whom Mr. William L. Henderson , Deputy Attorney General , was on the brief , for petitioner . The tax is uniform and does not ...
Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court. Argument for Petitioner . 308 U.S. with whom Mr. William L. Henderson , Deputy Attorney General , was on the brief , for petitioner . The tax is uniform and does not ...
Side 74
... petitioner's objection to the decree below is that it fails to consider and give effect to the Washington judgment of May 31 , 1935 , awarding the property in question to Pelkes , petitioner's assignor . It is petitioner's claim that ...
... petitioner's objection to the decree below is that it fails to consider and give effect to the Washington judgment of May 31 , 1935 , awarding the property in question to Pelkes , petitioner's assignor . It is petitioner's claim that ...
Side 75
... petitioner were foreclosed by the decision of the Supreme Court of Idaho of July 23 , 1936 . The issues tendered by petitioner in the trial court in this interpleader proceeding were ( 1 ) the invalidity of the Idaho decree , and ( 2 ) ...
... petitioner were foreclosed by the decision of the Supreme Court of Idaho of July 23 , 1936 . The issues tendered by petitioner in the trial court in this interpleader proceeding were ( 1 ) the invalidity of the Idaho decree , and ( 2 ) ...
Side 76
... petitioner in the interpleader action . The contention of petitioner in the interpleader proceedings that the Idaho court did not have jurisdiction of the stock controversy because that controversy was in the exclusive jurisdiction of ...
... petitioner in the interpleader action . The contention of petitioner in the interpleader proceedings that the Idaho court did not have jurisdiction of the stock controversy because that controversy was in the exclusive jurisdiction of ...
Side 149
... petitioner in No. 11 . Mr. Robert I. Morris argued the cause , and Messrs . Meyer Q. Kessel and Joseph C. Braelow were on the brief , for respondent in No. 11 . Since the ordinance is valid on its face and petitioner failed to seek a ...
... petitioner in No. 11 . Mr. Robert I. Morris argued the cause , and Messrs . Meyer Q. Kessel and Joseph C. Braelow were on the brief , for respondent in No. 11 . Since the ordinance is valid on its face and petitioner failed to seek a ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
308 U.S. Decisions 48 Stat action administrative affirmed amended application assets Assistant Attorney Bank bankruptcy bondholders carrier Circuit Court Circuit denied claim Comm'n Commission common carrier Company Congress constitutional Corp corporation County Court of Appeals creditors debtor Decisions Denying Certiorari deductions District Court employees equitable ex rel federal courts Fifth Circuit filed forma pauperis further in forma gift tax Helvering Idaho immunity income interest interpleader Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Act Interstate Commerce Commission judgment jurisdiction JUSTICE Labor Relations Board legislation levee Marvin Smith Massachusetts Messrs Missouri motion for leave National Labor Relations November October 9 party Pelkes peti Petition for writ petitioner pleading pro se proceedings question railroad regulation reorganization Reported Revenue Act rule Sewall Key Solicitor General Jackson statute stockholders suit Supp supra Supreme Court taxable taxpayer Texas tion tioner trust United writ of certiorari York
Populære avsnitt
Side 652 - The signature of an attorney constitutes a certificate by him that he has read the pleading, that to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief there is good ground to support it, and that it is not interposed for delay.
Side 395 - Any person aggrieved by a final order of the Board granting or denying in whole or in part the relief sought...
Side 480 - ... keep the word of promise to the ear, and break it to the hope" — we have presumed to court the assistance of the friends of the drama to strengthen our infant institution.
Side 373 - In obeying and construing these rules due regard shall be had to all dangers of navigation and collision, and to any special circumstances which may render a departure from the above rules necessary in order to avoid immediate danger.
Side 658 - A party may amend his pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served or, if the pleading is one to which no responsive pleading is permitted and the action has not been placed upon the trial calendar, he may so amend it at any time within 20 days after it is served.
Side 67 - States are plaintiffs, or petitioners; or an alien is a party, or the suit is between a citizen of the state where the suit is brought, and a citizen of another state.
Side 629 - States shall have the power to prescribe, by general rules, for the district courts of the United States and for the courts of the District of Columbia, the forms of process, writs, pleadings, and motions, and the practice and procedure in civil actions at law. Said rules shall neither abridge, enlarge, nor modify the substantive rights of any litigant.
Side 95 - In the case of mines, oil and gas wells, other natural deposits, and timber, a reasonable allowance for depletion and for depreciation of improvements, according to the peculiar conditions in each case...
Side 34 - A final certification may be made by a secretary of embassy or legation, consul general, consul, vice consul, or consular agent of the United States, or a diplomatic or consular official of the foreign country assigned or accredited to the United States.
Side 643 - Upon an infant or an incompetent person, by serving the summons and complaint in the manner prescribed by the law of the state in ^which the service is made for the service of summons or other like process upon any such defendant in an action brought in the courts of general jurisdiction of that state.