DISCRIMINATION. See Antitrust Acts, 8; Constitutional Law,
XI; XII; District of Columbia.

DISTILLING. See Constitutional Law, IV.

DISTRICT COURTS. See Jurisdiction, I; IV.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Racial restrictive covenants-Unenforceable in courts.-Enforce-
ment of racial restrictive covenants in District of Columbia courts
precluded by R. S. § 1978 and public policy. Hurd v. Hodge, 24.

DIVORCE. See Constitutional Law, IX; X, 4.

DOMICILE. See Constitutional Law, IX; X, 4.

DOUBLE JEOPARDY. See Constitutional Law, X, 10.

DUE PROCESS.

See Constitutional Law, X.

EFFICIENCY RATINGS. See Veterans.

EMERGENCY COURT OF APPEALS. See Jurisdiction, I, 3.

EMINENT DOMAIN. See Constitutional Law, VI.

EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE. See Labor.

EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS. See Constitutional Law, XI.
EQUITY. See also Jurisdiction, I, 1-2.

Maxims Clean hands—Application.-Previous conviction of chal-
lenger of constitutionality of statute did not warrant application of
clean hands maxim. Toomer v. Witsell, 385.

EVIDENCE. See Antitrust Acts, 8; Constitutional Law, IV;
Habeas Corpus, 1.

EXCESSIVE PROFITS. See Constitutional Law, II, 2–3.

EXHAUSTION OF REMEDY. See Jurisdiction, IV, 1; Proce-
dure, 6.

EX POST FACTO LAWS. See Constitutional Law, V.

FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT. See Labor.

FAIR TRIAL. See Constitutional Law, X, 5–11.

FEDERAL AGENTS. See Constitutional Law, IV.

FEDERAL QUESTION. See Jurisdiction, II, 2-3.

FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONS. See Constitutional Law, I.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. See Antitrust Acts, 8.

FELONY. See Constitutional Law, IV.

FIFTH AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, VI; X.

FINAL JUDGMENT.

See Jurisdiction, II, 1.

FINDINGS. See Antitrust Acts, 8.

FIRST AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, III.

FISHING. See Constitutional Law, XI, 6, 8.

FLORIDA. See Constitutional Law, IX, 1.

FORUM NON CONVENIENS. See Jurisdiction, IV, 2.

FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, X; XI;
XII.

FOURTH AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, IV.

FOURTH-OFFENDER LAW. See Constitutional Law, V; X, 10.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND PRESS. See Constitutional Law,
III.

FULL FAITH AND CREDIT. See Constitutional Law, IX.
GAS. See Jurisdiction, II, 1.

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS. See Constitutional Law, II, 2–3;
Procedure, 1, 4.

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. See Veterans.

GROSS RECEIPTS TAX. See Constitutional Law, VII, 3.
HABEAS CORPUS. See also Jurisdiction, II, 8; III, 2; IV, 1.

1. Petition-Sufficiency-Hearing.-Dismissal of fourth petition for
habeas corpus, which for first time alleged knowing use of false testi-
mony by prosecution to obtain conviction, erroneous. Price v. John-
266.

ston,

2. State prisoner-Claim of federal right-Exhausting state rem-
edy.-Discretion of federal district court to entertain application for
habeas corpus though petitioner did not seek certiorari to review
state supreme court's denial. Wade v. Mayo, 672.

3. Production of prisoner to argue own appeal.-Circuit court of
appeals has discretion to require production of prisoner to argue own
appeal. Price v. Johnston, 266.

HABITUAL CRIMINALS. See Constitutional Law, V; X, 10.
HEARING. See Constitutional Law, X.

HUSBAND AND WIFE. See Constitutional Law, IX.

IMMUNITIES.

IMPORTS.

See Constitutional Law, XII.

See Constitutional Law, VIII.

INDIANS. See Constitutional Law, I, 2.

INDICTMENT. See Constitutional Law, X, 6.

INHERITANCE TAX. See Constitutional Law, I, 2.

INJUNCTION. See Antitrust Acts; Jurisdiction, I, 2.

INSURANCE.

National Service Life Insurance-Payments to beneficiaries-In-
stallments.-Amount of monthly installments payable to beneficiaries
over age 30; Veterans' Administration Regulation 3450 valid. United
States v. Zazove, 602.

Judgments-Inclusion of interest—Mandate.-District court enter-
ing judgment on mandate of circuit court of appeals may not add
interest not provided for by mandate. Briggs v. Pennsylvania R. Co.,
304.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE. See Antitrust Acts; Constitutional
Law, VII; Transportation.

INTERVENTION. See Procedure, 2.

INTOXICATING LIQUORS. See Constitutional Law, IV.

JAPANESE. See Constitutional Law, XI, 6.

JUDGES. See Constitutional Law, X, 1, 5, 8; XI, 1; District of
Columbia.

JUDGMENTS. See Antitrust Acts, 1, 8; Constitutional Law, IX;
Interest; Jurisdiction.

JURISDICTION. See also Constitutional Law, IX; X, 4; Inter-
est; Procedure, 3; Transportation.

I. In General, p. 883.

II. Supreme Court, p. 883.

III. Circuit Courts of Appeals, p. 883.

IV. District Courts, p. 884.

V. Tax Court, p. 884.

References to particular subjects under title Jurisdiction.-Ade-
quate Legal Remedy, I, 2; All Writs Act, III, 2; Antitrust Acts, IV, 2;
Attorney General, II, 5; Certiorari, IV, 1; Clayton Act, IV, 2; Con-
stitutional Law, II, 4; Continuance, II, 2; Corporations, IV, 2; Crim-
inal Procedure, III, 2; IV, 1; District of Columbia, I, 1; Emergency
Court of Appeals, I, 3; Equity, I, 1-2; Federal Question, II, 2-3;
Finality of Judgment, II, 1; Habeas Corpus, II, 8; III, 2; IV, 1;
Injunction, I, 2; Mandamus, III, 1; Mandate, III, 1; Non-Federal
Question, II, 2, 4-8; Price Control Act, I, 3; Racial Restrictive Cove-
nants, I, 1; Renegotiation Act, I, 4; IV, 3; State Law, II, 4–8.

JURISDICTION-Continued.

I. In General.

1. Federal courts-Limitations of power-Racial restrictive cove-
nants.-Federal courts and courts of District of Columbia without
power to enforce racial restrictive covenants. Shelley v. Kraemer, 1;
Hurd v. Hodge, 24.

2. Federal courts-Equity-Enjoining state law.-Adequacy of
legal remedy as bar to equitable relief. Toomer v. Witsell, 385.

3. Federal courts-Price Control Act-Validity of rent order.—
Jurisdiction as between District Court and Emergency Court of
Appeals to determine validity of rent order; effect of 1947 amend-
ment. Woods v. Hills, 210.

4. Federal courts-Renegotiation Act.-Finality of administrative
determination of excessive profits, in absence of timely petition to
Tax Court for redetermination. Lichter v. United States, 742.
II. Supreme Court.

1. Review of state courts-Finality of judgment.-Order giving
producer alternatives of purchasing other's gas, or marketing and
accounting therefor, or closing own wells, not appealable “final” judg-
ment. Republic Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma, 62.

2. Review of state courts-Federal or non-federal question.-Con-
tinuance of cause pending advice as to basis of state supreme court
judgment. Loftus v. Illinois, 804.

3. Review of state courts-Federal question.-Federal question as
properly presented. Central Greyhound Lines v. Mealey, 653.

4. Review of state courts-State law-Decision of highest state
court that right under state constitution had not been denied is bind-
ing here. Paterno v. Lyons, 314.

5. Id. Views of attorney general as to state law entitled to great
weight, in absence of statute or decision. Phyle v. Duffy, 431.

6. Id. Construction of state statute is for state courts. Gryger
v. Burke, 728.

7. Review of state courts-Non-federal question.-Judgment of
state supreme court as resting on adequate non-federal ground.
Hedgebeth v. North Carolina, 806.

8. Id. State court's denial of habeas corpus as wrong remedy not
reviewable; adequate non-federal ground. Phyle v. Duffy, 431.
III. Circuit Courts of Appeals.

1. Mandamus-Mandate.-Circuit court of appeals may compel
district court to comply with mandate in case adjudged under Act
of June 9, 1944, though term has expired and further appeal might
come to Supreme Court. United States v. U. S. District Court, 258.

JURISDICTION—Continued.

2. All Writs Act-Production of prisoner to argue own appeal.—
Circuit court of appeals has discretion to require production of pris-
oner to argue own appeal. Price v. Johnston, 266.

IV. District Courts.

1. Habeas corpus-State prisoner-Exhaustion of state remedy.—
Discretion of district court to entertain application for habeas corpus
though petitioner did not seek certiorari to review state supreme
court's denial. Wade v. Mayo, 672.

2. Clayton Act, § 12-Forum non conveniens.-Court may not
decline to exercise jurisdiction of civil proceeding against corporation
brought in district authorized by § 12 of Clayton Act. United States
v. National City Lines, 573.

3. Renegotiation Act.-Scope of jurisdiction of District Court and
of Tax Court. Lichter v. United States, 742.

V. Tax Court.

Renegotiation Act.-Jurisdiction of Tax Court under Renegotiation
Act. Lichter v. United States, 742.

JUST COMPENSATION. See Constitutional Law, VI.

LABOR. See also Procedure, 1.

1. Fair Labor Standards Act-Overtime-Longshoremen.-Con-
tract between longshoremen's union and employers, specifying rate
of pay for weekday daytime hours and 50% more for other hours,
did not comply with overtime compensation requirements of Act.
Bay Ridge Co. v. Aaron, 446.

2. Id. Determination of "regular rate" of pay for longshoremen ;
overtime premium and shift differential distinguished; computation
of amount of compensation due. Id.

LAW OFFICERS. See Constitutional Law, III, 1; IV; X, 9.
LEGISLATIVE POWER. See Constitutional Law, II.

LICENSE. See Constitutional Law, III, 1; XI, 6; XII.

LIFE INSURANCE. See Insurance.

LONGSHOREMEN. See Labor.

LOUD-SPEAKERS. See Constitutional Law, III, 1.

MANDAMUS.

1. Power to issue writ-Federal courts.-Judicial Code § 262 em-
powers federal courts to issue writ in exercise or aid of appellate
jurisdiction. United States v. U. S. District Court, 258.