Penal Practice and Penal Policy in Ancient RomeRoutledge, 12. mars 2007 - 264 sider Using Roman literary and legal sources, this book assesses Roman penal policy through an in-depth examination of six high-profile criminal cases, ranging from the Bacchanalian trials in 186 BC to the trials for treason and magic in the fourth century. Identifying Roman attitudes to crime and punishment, this book brings out contrasts and developments in those attitudes. O.F. Robinson examines Roman criminal legislation (both that laid down by Justinian and that codified and confirmed by him) as well as Roman attitudes, both juristic and philosophical, to the purposes of punishment, including deterrence, retribution, reform, protection of the public and how they were modified over time. The author also discusses arguments for fixed as against flexible penalties, and the changes made in the actual punishments and in those to whom they were applied. This book is an essential tool for any specialist, student or researcher wishing to learn more about Roman values from their approach to crime and punishment. |
Innhold
Del 24 | |
Del 25 | |
Del 26 | |
Del 27 | |
Del 28 | |
Del 29 | |
Del 30 | |
Del 31 | |
Del 9 | |
Del 10 | |
Del 11 | |
Del 12 | |
Del 13 | |
Del 14 | |
Del 15 | |
Del 16 | |
Del 17 | |
Del 18 | |
Del 19 | |
Del 20 | |
Del 21 | |
Del 22 | |
Del 23 | |
Del 32 | |
Del 33 | |
Del 34 | |
Del 35 | |
Del 36 | |
Del 37 | |
Del 38 | |
Del 39 | |
Del 40 | |
Del 41 | |
Del 42 | |
Del 43 | |
Del 44 | |
Del 45 | |
Del 46 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Penal Practice and Penal Policy in Ancient Rome O. F. Robinson Ingen forhåndsvisning tilgjengelig - 2012 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
accusation Aebutius Ammianus andthe astrologers atthe Augustus Bacchanalian bythe capital century charge Christians Chrysogonus Cicero citizens Claudius Code cognitio condemned confiscation Constantine consul court crime criminal law cult Cyprian death decurions defence delators Dio Cassius Diocletian diritto edict emperor Empire Eusebius exile fromthe Galerius Germanicus governor hadbeen havebeen Hispala honestiores imperial inthe itwas Iulia jurists Justinian later legislation lex Iulia Livy magic magistrates Magnus Marcian martyrs murder normal NovJ offences ofhis ofthe onthe ordo pagan parricide penale penalty perhaps persecution persons Pionius Piso Piso’s Plancina Pliny Postumius praetor Praetorian Prefect Prefect presumably prison procedure Procopius prosecution province punishment quaestio quaestiones perpetuae repetundae Republic Robinson Roman Rome römischen Rosc sacrifice SCPP SDHI seems Senate Senate’s senatorial Seneca sentence Sextus Roscius sicariis slaves status Suet Tacitus thatthe Theodosian theRoman theSenate Tiberius tobe tohave torture tothe treason trial Ulpian Valens withthe