Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

history of the science. The Monatliche Correspondenz, published by Baron de Zach from 1500 to 1813, and his Correspondance Astronomique, from 1818 to the present time; to which we must add the Zeitschrift für Astronomie, by Lindeneau and Bohnenberger, from 1816 to 1818, contain a very full and interesting account of all the discoveries and works on astronomy, during that period, so remarkable for the importance of those discoveries and the improvements in various branches of that science.

The part of astronomy, which treats of the mutual attraçtions of the heavenly bodies, may be studied most advantageously, in the works of Clairaut, Euler, D'Alembert, Lagrange, and Laplace. Clairaut's Théorie de la Figure de la Terre, is an important work. Several of his papers on the lunar theory were useful in their day, but have been superseded by the improved works of later authors. Euler's publications are extremely voluminous. Besides his separate works on all points of the system of the world, there are numerous papers of his in the transactions of the Academies of Berlin and Petersburgh, many of which are highly finished compositions, fit to be studied as models of analytical elegance. D'Alembert published several literary works, eulogies of deceased academicians, and many important articles in the Cyclopedia, particularly the Introduction prefixed to the first volume, also numerous memoirs in the transactions of several academies, of which he was an associate, and at intervals, he gave separately his Opuscules, and other mathematical and philosophical papers, in about fifteen volumes, 4to. He introduced into the calculation of problems of dynamics, an important principle by which they were all reduced to the usual calculations of statics; he also showed how to express the motions of fluids in terms of partial differentials. Euler and D'Alembert were cotemporaries, and excelled all others of their time, in mathematical genius and invention. Their talents were different, but it was not easy to decide which, on the whole, deserved the preference. D'Alembert's inventive powers were great, but he generally did not take much pains in finishing and explaining his scientific discoveries. Euler devoted himself

to the improvement of the methods of analysis, and with great patience would copy a whole volume, to make a few changes in its arrangement to render it more clear, or to introduce

some small corrections and modifications; and what D'Alembert invented, Euler would frequently simplify, adorn, and explain. The course of life of these two illustrious men was very different. D'Alembert's literary acquirements, his great wit, mixed with some spice of malice, the boldness of his attacks on the most commonly received opinions in religion and government, as in some of the articles of the Cyclopedia, and his connexion and intercourse with Voltaire, raised up against him numerous enemies, who, by their incessant attacks, embittered his life, so that he was sometimes willing to retire a while from this vexatious scene, and take refuge, as he says in one of his letters, in his 'peaceful geometry.' Euler's life, on the contrary, was peaceful and glorious. In his intercourse with the haughty Frederick of Prussia, at whose court he resided, as President of the Academy, he obtained at all times those attentions and civilities due to a man of his great worth, and for several years he experienced none of those ill natured sallies of wit and sarcasm, with which that monarch frequently indulged himself, at the expense of the literary and scientific men, whom he had collected around him. Upon some breach of decorum on the part of the King, Euler demanded his passports, which Frederick very reluctantly granted. Euler then accepted the invitation of the Empress Catherine, and went to Petersburgh, where he was placed at the head of the mathematical department of the Academy of Arts and Sciences of that city, and everything was done to render the situation agreeable to him and to his family. Among other honors, he had the offer of some military title, a circumstance which strongly marks the nature of the Russian government, where every one takes rank according to his military standing. It is unnecessary to say, that Euler declined the proposed honor. He continued at Petersburgh till his death, which happened in 1783, in the seventysixth year of his age. He had lost his sight several years before, but his astonishing powers of computation, by memory, remained unimpaired, and a few minutes before his dissolution, he had been employed on some calculations of the orbit of the then newly discovered planet Uranus.

Upon the decease of Euler, Lagrange remained undisputedly the greatest mathematician then living. He had

published many memoirs in the collections of several academies, with which he was associated; among them may be particularly mentioned those, in which the discovery of the calculus of variations is explained, a method, which extends the powers of the differential calculus, and simplifies, in a wonderful degree, the solution of a large class of interesting questions, in pure and mixed mathematics, useful in many cases of physical astronomy; also his papers on the libration of the moon, on the mutual attractions of the satellites, on the theory of functions; but, above all others, his Mécanique Analytique. In this work, he made a great improvement in the method of applying the principle of D'Alembert, for reducing the problems of dynamics to statics. The method used by D'Alembert was indirect, and sometimes troublesome, but Lagrange, by connecting with it the principle of virtual velocities, was enabled, in an extremely simple, elegant, and general manner, to reduce all the problems of mechanics to the common formulas of analysis, and the most complicated questions on the attractions of bodies were reduced to the solution of algebraical and differential equations. This work was written at Berlin, but Lagrange wished to have it printed at Paris, where it could be executed in a better style. A copy was made and forwarded to the care of the Abbé Marie, and it would now hardly be believed, that he could not, in 1788, get a printer to undertake the publication of that single quarto volume, without a guarantee to pay the expenses, in case the sale of the work should not be sufficient. The Abbé agreed to this condition, and did even more; for, at his own expense, he procured the assistance of one of the first mathematicians of Paris, Legendre, to overlook the publication, and see that it was printed correctly. The second edition of this immortal work, was published in 1811, with many additions and improvements, showing the vigor of his mind, though in extreme old age. Unfortunately for science, he did not live to complete the whole of the second volume, and a few of the last chapters are given exactly as in the first edition. This work ought to be studied frequently, by every one who wishes to learn the most approved methods of treating the science of physical astronomy. It is much easier to be read than Laplace's Mécanique Céleste, as it does not go into the

detail and numerical calculations, which are necessary in the application of the formulas. Lagrange succeeded Euler in the direction of the academy at Berlin, and he resided there till the death of Frederick; soon after which, in the year 1787, he was invited by the French minister to accept an appointment at Paris, where he remained till his decease, in 1813. For several years after his return to Paris, he was affected with a melancholy depression of spirits, or apathy, which made him wholly inattentive to mathematical pursuits; he said his enthusiasm was extinct; and, for two years after his Mécanique Analytique had been printed, his curiosity had not been sufficiently excited to cut open the leaves and look at his printed copy. A mind like Lagrange's could not, however, be unoccupied. The discoveries that had been made in chemistry, and the new nomenclature, attracted his attention; he studied that science, which had formerly appeared obscure, and was surprised to find it, to use his own expression, as easy as algebra; he attended also to other branches of science, to literature, and to metaphysics. The revolution, which soon after took place, again excited him, and renewed his zeal for his former pursuits; and, in the few last years of his life, he appeared with all the energy of his best days. He was a great admirer of the talents and writings of Newton, but remarked, that Newton must be considered as very fortunate, in being born at a time, when an opportunity was given him to explain the system of the world; a good fortune, added he, with an air of chagrin, that one does not meet with every day. He recommended the writings of Euler to students as models, without seeming to be aware, that nothing better could be offered for their imitation than some of his own works.

The discoveries of Laplace, who now takes the lead in mathematical acquirements, have been very numerous and important; several of them have already been mentioned. It would extend too far the limits of this review to attempt to analyse, or give a particular account of his great work, the Mécanique Céleste, in which all his improvements are embodied with those of the eminent men, who preceded him; the whole forming a complete and beautiful system of all that is now known in physical astronomy. Those, who take pleasure in the abstruse investigation of modern analysis, may there VOL. XX.-No. 47.

47

find it applied, with great elegance, to the demonstration of all the principles of dynamics, to the figures and motions of the planetary bodies, satellites, and comets, and to the effects of their mutual attractions. The theorems and principles contained in this work have been explained by Laplace, in as popular a manner as the nature of the subject would admit, in his Exposition du Système du Monde, which has gone through five editions, with numerous improvements. Whoever will make himself master of these works, will have no need to seek in other sources for anything relative to the principles of physical astronomy, or the application of those principles to the system of the world.

ART. V.-Letters on the Gospels. By MISS HANNAH ADAMS. 18mo. pp. 216. Cambridge. Hilliard & Metcalf. 1824. THE author of these letters has long been known to the public, as a successful writer on theological subjects, and as having rendered essential service to religion, by the productions of her pen. Her Views of Religions, or, as she denominates it in the last edition, her Dictionary of all Religions and Religious Denominations, has been a popular work from the time of its first publication. It has passed through four editions, the last of which is enlarged and greatly improved. It was published in England, with a preface and additions, by Mr Andrew Fuller; and also in another form by Mr Thomas Williams, who likewise made alterations. To both these editors, Miss Adams acknowledges herself indebted, for some of the improvements of her fourth edition. This work is the best manual with which we are acquainted, for giving information respecting the religious views now entertained by Christians, and such as have prevailed in different ages, since the origin of Christianity. It has the peculiar merit of the strictest candor and impartiality; and so completely has the author divested herself of all individual prepossessions, that it may be doubted whether, from a single passage in the whole work, her own religious sentiments can be inferred. This freedom from personal bias, in exhibiting the views of others, especially on topics rarely touched without calling out private opinion, in

« ForrigeFortsett »