At the close of the plaintiff's testimony the defendant moved ' for a nonsuit, which the court denied, and the case was submitted to the Jury, which returned a verdict In favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $500. Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Side 102av Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, James M. Reasoner, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Richard W. Cooper - 1916Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1919 - 800 sider
...Cashin v. Ptiter, 168 Mich. 391. This motion was overruled. The defendant then put in its testimony and the case was submitted to the jury which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,272. From a judgment on this verdict the case is brought here by writ of... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1912 - 794 sider
...of all the testimony, the defendant moved for a directed verdict. These motions were overruled, and the case was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff. The case is brought here by writ of error.... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1914 - 808 sider
...guilty of contributory negligence. This motion was denied. Defendant offered no evidence in the case. The case was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, upon which a judgment was duly entered. The case is here upon a writ of error, and the... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 806 sider
...satisfactory on May 15, 1914, was captiously made. Upon this theory testimony was taken and the case submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered. It is the contention of the defendant, appellant, that... | |
| Ohio. Supreme Court - 1921 - 706 sider
...generally that there was a dam, and also denied that there was any negligence on its part. The cause was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and forty-seven dollars. The case was taken on error to the court... | |
| 1920 - 1148 sider
...close of the plaintiff's testimony the defendant moved ' for a nonsuit, which the court denied, and the case was submitted to the Jury, which returned a verdict In favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $500. A motion for new trial, and for Judgment non obstante veredicto, based... | |
| 1920 - 1280 sider
...plaintiff's testimony the defendant moved for a nonsuit, which the court denied, and the case \vas submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $500. A motion for new trial, and for judgment non obstante veredicto, based... | |
| 1912 - 1182 sider
...unreasonable discrimination in the matter of furnishing facilities for transportation under the act of 1883. The case was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and, judgment having been entered thereon, the defendant took this appeal. It was found... | |
| 1896 - 1252 sider
...for negligence causing the death of plaintiff's testator. The question of the defendant's liability was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $1,300; and it is from the judgment thereupon entered, and from the order denying a new... | |
| |