The Northeastern Reporter, Volum 99Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-3 av 100
Side 97
IN TRUSTWORDS SUFFICIENT TO CREATE The presumption is against
intestacy and TRUST - " TAKE AND HOLD . " . disinherison . Under a will which
put two daughters and two grandchildren in separate classes , the grand[ Ed .
Note .
IN TRUSTWORDS SUFFICIENT TO CREATE The presumption is against
intestacy and TRUST - " TAKE AND HOLD . " . disinherison . Under a will which
put two daughters and two grandchildren in separate classes , the grand[ Ed .
Note .
Side 100
It is not a fair implicaThe sixth section provides a trustee " to tion that , upon the
death of one , the surtake , hold , and ... said grandchildren until the cause the
same reason holds as to all of it contingencies named in the next succeeding as
to a ...
It is not a fair implicaThe sixth section provides a trustee " to tion that , upon the
death of one , the surtake , hold , and ... said grandchildren until the cause the
same reason holds as to all of it contingencies named in the next succeeding as
to a ...
Side 414
Episcopal Churches to hold property in trust The will shows a plain appreciation
by its for religious uses ( outside of church ... as to be beyond its pow - limit the
amount of property which they er to take and hold apart from the statute . may
hold .
Episcopal Churches to hold property in trust The will shows a plain appreciation
by its for religious uses ( outside of church ... as to be beyond its pow - limit the
amount of property which they er to take and hold apart from the statute . may
hold .
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Innhold
Knickerbocker Ice Co v Surprise Ind Ind App | 756 |
Kohlsaat Co v OConnell Ill 689 McIntosh Cadle v Ind App | 779 |
Koons Baltimore 0 R Co v Ohio 1121 McKee Douglass v Ohio 1125 | 875 |
2 andre deler vises ikke
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action adverse possession affirmed alleged amendment amount answer appellant appellee apply authority bank benefit bill bonds brought building cause Cent charge claim complaint condition considered Constitution construction contract corporation court damages decree defendant determine direct district duty effect entered entitled equity error evidence exceptions execution exercise facts filed finding follows fund further give given granted ground held hold interest issue judge judgment jury land lease lien Mass matter means ment motion municipal necessary negligence Note Note.-For notice NUMBER objection officers Ohio opinion paid parties payment person plaintiff possession present proceeding proposed question railroad reason received record refused relation reversed rule statute sufficient suit tion town trial trustee union witness York