Winning at TrialAspen Publishing, 11. juni 2007 - 440 sider Chosen the best book from over 300 entries, Winning at Trial has been singled out by the Association of Continuing Legal Education (ACLEA) for its clarity and innovative teaching methods. Winning at Trial by Shane Read is the only book that teaches trial skills by analyzing video and transcripts of actual trials. It is also the only book that reveals the secrets of jury decision-making through the use of video in collaboration with one of the nation's foremost jury consultants, DecisionQuest. This innovative book is being used by law schools throughout the country for both their introductory and advanced trial advocacy classes, as well as by law firms for their training programs. The author, a seasoned trial lawyer and professor, has carefully selected video and transcripts from actual trials (4 hours of video on two DVDs) that show lawyers demonstrating both great and terrible skills in the courtroom - which teach trial techniques and strategy in an interesting and memorable way. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 65
Side 2011
... Courtroom Fears The Six Don'ts of Opening Statements Examples of Themes Analysis of Prosecution's Opening Statement in U.S. v. McVeigh Analysis of Defendant's Opening Statement in U.S. v. McVeigh Study Questions for Opening Statement ...
... Courtroom Fears The Six Don'ts of Opening Statements Examples of Themes Analysis of Prosecution's Opening Statement in U.S. v. McVeigh Analysis of Defendant's Opening Statement in U.S. v. McVeigh Study Questions for Opening Statement ...
Side 2015
... courtroom. Some of the techniques are so well executed—and some so badly performed—that you will never forget the techniques after analyzing them. Moreover, although there are many textbooks available, they are either too theoretical or ...
... courtroom. Some of the techniques are so well executed—and some so badly performed—that you will never forget the techniques after analyzing them. Moreover, although there are many textbooks available, they are either too theoretical or ...
Side 2018
... courtroom for the voir dire video. In my early stages of writing, Professor Fred Moss, Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, provided much- needed encouragement. As the book developed, he provided invaluable suggestions ...
... courtroom for the voir dire video. In my early stages of writing, Professor Fred Moss, Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, provided much- needed encouragement. As the book developed, he provided invaluable suggestions ...
Side 4
... courtroom . Every law student - and even an experienced lawyer - needs to spend time at the courthouse watching different trials . You will see a variety of styles and get ideas to develop your own , based on your own strengths and ...
... courtroom . Every law student - and even an experienced lawyer - needs to spend time at the courthouse watching different trials . You will see a variety of styles and get ideas to develop your own , based on your own strengths and ...
Side 6
... courtroom after each break because you have trained them to expect that you will start off (primacy) with interesting and important testimony. Finally, your direct and cross-examinations should include themes from your opening and ...
... courtroom after each break because you have trained them to expect that you will start off (primacy) with interesting and important testimony. Finally, your direct and cross-examinations should include themes from your opening and ...
Innhold
31 | |
Chapter Three Opening Statement | 65 |
Examples of Themes | 103 |
Analysis of Prosecutions Opening Statement in U S v | 107 |
Analysis of Defendants Opening Statement in U S v | 121 |
Study Questions for Opening Statement Video Clips from | 111 |
Chapter Four Direct Examination | 122 |
Chapter Five CrossExamination | 50 |
The Three Donts of Closing Argument | 276 |
Analysis of Closing Arguments in People v Simpson | 286 |
Study Questions for Closing Argument Video Clips from | 304 |
Chapter Seven Exhibits and Objections | 309 |
Chapter Eight Conclusion | 365 |
Background for U S v McVeigh | 369 |
DVD Menus | 373 |
Federal Rules of Evidence | 387 |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
accident admissible admitted answer Background believe blood bombing burden of proof Christopher Darden civil client clip closing argument Colo conviction court courtroom credibility crime criminal cross-examination damages Daniel Petrocelli defendant’s defense attorney direct examination discussed End Memorably evidence examination of Lori example exhibit expert explain facts federal Fuhrman glove going Goldman hear hearsay Honor impeachment important inconsistent statements instructions Johnnie Cochran Jones Joseph Hartzler judge jurors ladies and gentlemen lawyers leading questions Lori Fortier Marcia Clark Mark Fuhrman Mauet McVeigh Michael Fortier murder Murrah Building Nicole O. J. Simpson objection officer Oklahoma opening statement opposing counsel outline party person plaintiff police prior inconsistent prior to trial prosecution prosecutor prove rebuttal argument record remember Ron Goldman Rule Scheck Study Questions Super talk tell testify testimony theme Tim McVeigh Timothy McVeigh verdict voir dire weaknesses