Winning at TrialAspen Publishing, 11. juni 2007 - 440 sider Chosen the best book from over 300 entries, Winning at Trial has been singled out by the Association of Continuing Legal Education (ACLEA) for its clarity and innovative teaching methods. Winning at Trial by Shane Read is the only book that teaches trial skills by analyzing video and transcripts of actual trials. It is also the only book that reveals the secrets of jury decision-making through the use of video in collaboration with one of the nation's foremost jury consultants, DecisionQuest. This innovative book is being used by law schools throughout the country for both their introductory and advanced trial advocacy classes, as well as by law firms for their training programs. The author, a seasoned trial lawyer and professor, has carefully selected video and transcripts from actual trials (4 hours of video on two DVDs) that show lawyers demonstrating both great and terrible skills in the courtroom - which teach trial techniques and strategy in an interesting and memorable way. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 35
Side 12
... depositions of the most important witnesses for each side. If you don't have videotape, summarize the testimony. Also, show a PowerPoint presentation of key exhibits (or just put them in a notebook for the jurors). Your presentation ...
... depositions of the most important witnesses for each side. If you don't have videotape, summarize the testimony. Also, show a PowerPoint presentation of key exhibits (or just put them in a notebook for the jurors). Your presentation ...
Side 21
... deposition, and other important information.24 12. Plaintiff's and Defendant's Trial Exhibit Lists 13. Plaintiff's and Defendant's Trial Witness Lists 14. Plaintiff's and Defendant's Proposed Jury Instructions 15. Motions in Limine and ...
... deposition, and other important information.24 12. Plaintiff's and Defendant's Trial Exhibit Lists 13. Plaintiff's and Defendant's Trial Witness Lists 14. Plaintiff's and Defendant's Proposed Jury Instructions 15. Motions in Limine and ...
Side 21
... deposition, 25 and (5) highlighted copies of exhibits you intend to use on cross. Cross of Plaintiff's Spouse (Outline Form) Cross of Plaintiff's Expert Witness (Outline Form) 22. Cross of Other Plaintiff's Witnesses (Outline Form) If ...
... deposition, 25 and (5) highlighted copies of exhibits you intend to use on cross. Cross of Plaintiff's Spouse (Outline Form) Cross of Plaintiff's Expert Witness (Outline Form) 22. Cross of Other Plaintiff's Witnesses (Outline Form) If ...
Side 29
... depositions will be too bulky to put in the notebook . 26. As opposed to a hired expert who reviews medical records , a treating doctor or nurse is the person who actually took care of the patient . 27. You can go to different parts of ...
... depositions will be too bulky to put in the notebook . 26. As opposed to a hired expert who reviews medical records , a treating doctor or nurse is the person who actually took care of the patient . 27. You can go to different parts of ...
Side 119
Du har nådd visningsgrensen for denne boken.
Du har nådd visningsgrensen for denne boken.
Innhold
31 | |
Chapter Three Opening Statement | 65 |
Examples of Themes | 103 |
Analysis of Prosecutions Opening Statement in U S v | 107 |
Analysis of Defendants Opening Statement in U S v | 121 |
Study Questions for Opening Statement Video Clips from | 111 |
Chapter Four Direct Examination | 122 |
Chapter Five CrossExamination | 50 |
The Three Donts of Closing Argument | 276 |
Analysis of Closing Arguments in People v Simpson | 286 |
Study Questions for Closing Argument Video Clips from | 304 |
Chapter Seven Exhibits and Objections | 309 |
Chapter Eight Conclusion | 365 |
Background for U S v McVeigh | 369 |
DVD Menus | 373 |
Federal Rules of Evidence | 387 |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
accident admissible admitted answer Background believe blood bombing burden of proof Christopher Darden civil client clip closing argument Colo conviction court courtroom credibility crime criminal cross-examination damages Daniel Petrocelli defendant’s defense attorney direct examination discussed End Memorably evidence examination of Lori example exhibit expert explain facts federal Fuhrman glove going Goldman hear hearsay Honor impeachment important inconsistent statements instructions Johnnie Cochran Jones Joseph Hartzler judge jurors ladies and gentlemen lawyers leading questions Lori Fortier Marcia Clark Mark Fuhrman Mauet McVeigh Michael Fortier murder Murrah Building Nicole O. J. Simpson objection officer Oklahoma opening statement opposing counsel outline party person plaintiff police prior inconsistent prior to trial prosecution prosecutor prove rebuttal argument record remember Ron Goldman Rule Scheck Study Questions Super talk tell testify testimony theme Tim McVeigh Timothy McVeigh verdict voir dire weaknesses