Winning at TrialAspen Publishing, 11. juni 2007 - 440 sider Chosen the best book from over 300 entries, Winning at Trial has been singled out by the Association of Continuing Legal Education (ACLEA) for its clarity and innovative teaching methods. Winning at Trial by Shane Read is the only book that teaches trial skills by analyzing video and transcripts of actual trials. It is also the only book that reveals the secrets of jury decision-making through the use of video in collaboration with one of the nation's foremost jury consultants, DecisionQuest. This innovative book is being used by law schools throughout the country for both their introductory and advanced trial advocacy classes, as well as by law firms for their training programs. The author, a seasoned trial lawyer and professor, has carefully selected video and transcripts from actual trials (4 hours of video on two DVDs) that show lawyers demonstrating both great and terrible skills in the courtroom - which teach trial techniques and strategy in an interesting and memorable way. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 92
Side 14
... testify, pretend you are hearing and seeing their testimony for the first time. Does it make sense? Can the jurors see the exhibits? Are the testimonies and exhibits understandable? By doing this, you can constantly assess how the ...
... testify, pretend you are hearing and seeing their testimony for the first time. Does it make sense? Can the jurors see the exhibits? Are the testimonies and exhibits understandable? By doing this, you can constantly assess how the ...
Side 14
... testify to three important facts, and limit your cross-examinations to three important topics. Let's see how this rule of three would apply in a simple civil case. Suppose you represent a defendant in an employment discrimination 15 ...
... testify to three important facts, and limit your cross-examinations to three important topics. Let's see how this rule of three would apply in a simple civil case. Suppose you represent a defendant in an employment discrimination 15 ...
Side 17
D. Shane Read. who has a history of testifying for both sides or, better yet, the other side. Best yet, find one who is well qualified but rarely testifies. You want someone who is testifying not because she makes a living doing it but ...
D. Shane Read. who has a history of testifying for both sides or, better yet, the other side. Best yet, find one who is well qualified but rarely testifies. You want someone who is testifying not because she makes a living doing it but ...
Side 25
... testify that she was driving southbound behind the truck and saw that the defendant was using a cell phone at the time of the collision (the defendant denies this and claims that the “on” cell phone found in the front of the car was ...
... testify that she was driving southbound behind the truck and saw that the defendant was using a cell phone at the time of the collision (the defendant denies this and claims that the “on” cell phone found in the front of the car was ...
Side 28
... testify. 17. The Concise Oxford Dictionary at 167 (Oxford 6th ed. 1976). 18. Roger Ailes, You Are the Message at 111 (Doubleday 1995). 19. Ailes further explains: “To determine whether you have the ingredients to be charismatic, answer ...
... testify. 17. The Concise Oxford Dictionary at 167 (Oxford 6th ed. 1976). 18. Roger Ailes, You Are the Message at 111 (Doubleday 1995). 19. Ailes further explains: “To determine whether you have the ingredients to be charismatic, answer ...
Innhold
31 | |
Chapter Three Opening Statement | 65 |
Examples of Themes | 103 |
Analysis of Prosecutions Opening Statement in U S v | 107 |
Analysis of Defendants Opening Statement in U S v | 121 |
Study Questions for Opening Statement Video Clips from | 111 |
Chapter Four Direct Examination | 122 |
Chapter Five CrossExamination | 50 |
The Three Donts of Closing Argument | 276 |
Analysis of Closing Arguments in People v Simpson | 286 |
Study Questions for Closing Argument Video Clips from | 304 |
Chapter Seven Exhibits and Objections | 309 |
Chapter Eight Conclusion | 365 |
Background for U S v McVeigh | 369 |
DVD Menus | 373 |
Federal Rules of Evidence | 387 |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
accident admissible admitted answer Background believe blood bombing burden of proof Christopher Darden civil client clip closing argument Colo conviction court courtroom credibility crime criminal cross-examination damages Daniel Petrocelli defendant’s defense attorney direct examination discussed End Memorably evidence examination of Lori example exhibit expert explain facts federal Fuhrman glove going Goldman hear hearsay Honor impeachment important inconsistent statements instructions Johnnie Cochran Jones Joseph Hartzler judge jurors ladies and gentlemen lawyers leading questions Lori Fortier Marcia Clark Mark Fuhrman Mauet McVeigh Michael Fortier murder Murrah Building Nicole O. J. Simpson objection officer Oklahoma opening statement opposing counsel outline party person plaintiff police prior inconsistent prior to trial prosecution prosecutor prove rebuttal argument record remember Ron Goldman Rule Scheck Study Questions Super talk tell testify testimony theme Tim McVeigh Timothy McVeigh verdict voir dire weaknesses