Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

Without Opinion.

may be incurred after the passage of said act by a vote of the people.

3. In case such levy for the year 1911 shall produce an amount greater than the amount of taxes levied in the year 1910, then such levy of ten mills on the dollar must be reduced to such a rate as will produce no more money than the taxes levied for the year 1910.

4. A municipal corporation may levy for municipal purposes as provided in preceding paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, an aggregate of five mills on the taxable property within such corporation only in the event that such levy of five mills, when added to the levy of state, county, township and school purposes, shall not exceed in the aggregate ten mills on the dollar, of the taxable property within such taxing district exclusive of levies for sinking fund and interest purposes necessary to provide for any indebtedness incurred before the passage of said act and any indebtedness that may be incurred after the passage of said act by a vote of the people, and provided further, that such levy of ten mills on the dollar of taxable property shall not produce for the year 1911 an amount greater than the amount of taxes levied in the year 1910, and whenever such levy exceeds either of said limitations, then it is the duty of the budget commission to revise and reduce said levies in manner and form as directed and authorized by Section 5649-3c, General Code, as enacted June 2, 1911, having due regard to the proportions of the total amount that each taxing board or taxing officers are authorized to levy, so that such aggregate of all taxes for all purposes in each taxing district

Cases Reported.

shall not exceed ten mills on the dollar exclusive of sinking fund and interest purposes as aforesaid, and shall not produce for the year 1911 a greater amount of taxes than levied in the year 1910, as provided in paragraph three of this entry. But whenever any levy for township, county, school or municipal purposes exceeds the maximum amount that may be levied for such purpose as provided by Section 5649-3a, General Code, then such excessive levy must first be reduced by the budget commission to the maximum amount provided in such section before said budget commission proceeds to revise and reduce all the levies certified for such taxing district to bring the aggregate of all within the limitations above referred to, to-wit: ten mills on each dollar of taxable property and to an amount not greater than the taxes levied in the year 1910.

5. The right to levy five mills on the taxable property within such corporation is further limited by the provision that if said levy of ten mills for the year 1911 will produce more taxes than were levied in the year 1910, then such levy should again be scaled by the budget commission until the same will produce no larger revenue than the taxes levied in the year 1910.

6. The five mills, which, subject to the qualifications hereinbefore defined, may be levied by a municipal corporation for corporation purposes, are exclusive of such levies for interest and sinking fund purposes as are or may be necessary to provide for any municipal indebtedness incurred prior to the passage of the act of June 2, 1911,

Without Opinion.

and any indebtedness thereafter incurred by a vote of the people.

This court, therefore, finds that the relator is entitled to a peremptory writ of mandamus com-. manding the auditor of Lucas county, defendant herein, to ascertain the rate of taxes necessary to produce the amounts to him certified by the budget commission of Lucas county, provided that the aggregate, (exclusive of the levy for the sinking fund and interest purposes, for indebtedness heretofore incurred, and indebtedness that may have been incurred by a vote of the people), shall not exceed the rate of ten mills and the total fund raised thereby including the amount necessary for the sinking fund and interest as aforesaid shall not exceed the amount raised in the year 1910, then to enter the same upon the tax duplicate of Lucas county.

Also, that he ascertain the rate of the levy necessary for sinking fund and interest purposes to provide for indebtedness incurred before the passage of said act and any indebtedness that may have been incurred since the passage of the act by a vote of the people, if any, and add such levy to the tax duplicate in addition to said ten mills, but the total of both levies not to exceed the total sum levied in the year 1910.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue against the defendant, as auditor of Lucas county, commanding him to make levies as provided herein.

SPEAR, C. J., DAVIS, SHAUCK, PRICE, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

INDEX

ABETTING DELINQUENCY OF FEMALE-

An affidavit which charges that accused did aid, abet, and con-
tribute, etc., to delinquency of a female minor child, states an
offense under Section 1654, General. Code, and is not bad for
duplicity, when. See Fisher v. State, 360.

ACCEPTANCE OF CHECK-

Where a check is enclosed in a letter which is misdirected by
mistake of the drawer of the check and the letter is delivered
to another person of the same name as the payee, who endorses
and negotiates the check, which is finally received by the drawee
bank and paid, and charged to the drawer's account, the latter
cannot recover from the bank. See Weisberger Co. v. Bank, 21.

ACCOUNT BY COUNTY OFFICER-

The word "year" as used in act of March 22, 1906 (90 O.. L.,. 89),
which fixes salaries of certain county officers, is the calendar
year, and the end of each quarter, referred to in Section 6,
requiring the payment into the county treasury of all fees col-
lected during such period means the end of each quarter of
three months after January first of each year. See State v.
Van Gunten, 172.

ACCOUNT FOR COLLECTION—

A client who takes out of the hands of his attorney an account
which the latter has accepted for collection for a percentage of
the amount collected, is liable in damages for breach of con-
tract, when. See Scheinsohn v. Lemonek, 424.

ACCOUNT OF EXECUTOR-

In settlement of final account-Becomes conclusive and absolute,
when-Judgment of probate court-Section 6187, Revised
Statutes-Filing of exceptions-After the expiration of the
eight months allowed by Section 6187, Revised Statutes, for
filing exceptions when the account is settled in the absence of
a person interested and without actual notice to him, the judg-
ment of a probate court settling the final account of an exe-
cutor or an administrator becomes absolute and conclusive and
cannot be attacked except for fraud of the prevailing party.
Crawford v. Zeigler, 224.

511

« ForrigeFortsett »