 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 802 sider
...To justify the State in interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must be made to appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...a particular class, require such interference and that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose and are not unduly oppressive... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 sider
...601), Justice Brown, after denning in general language the term "police power of the State," said: 11 To justify the State in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, )<V.s7, that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class,... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1920 - 684 sider
...authorities in interfering with the rights and privileges of the owners of property it must appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...of a particular class, require such interference. 3. SAME — laws in exercise of police power are subject to supervision of courts. Laws enacted in... | |
 | 1894 - 922 sider
...necessary for the protection of such interests. Barbier v. Connolly, 113 US 27; Kidd v. Pearson, 128 id. 1. To justify the State in thus interposing its authority...oppressive upon individuals. The Legislature may not, under the guise of protecting the public interests, arbitrarily interfere with private business, or impose... | |
 | 1901 - 510 sider
...necessary for the protection of such interests, subject, of course, to the restrictions that it must appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...particular class, require such interference ; and that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose and not unduly oppressive... | |
 | 1920 - 516 sider
...Business. — To Justify the state in Interfering with the conduct of a lawful business, it must appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...a particular class, require such interference, and that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1904 - 636 sider
...abridgment." So, in Lawton v. Steele, 152 US 133, 14 Sup. Ct. 499, 38 L. Ed. 385, Mr. Justice Brown said : "To justify the State in thus interposing its authority...such interference; and, second, that the means are reasonable for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals. The .Legislature... | |
 | R. H. Andrews - 1899 - 422 sider
...incapacity, as well as deception and fraud." In the case of Lawton vs. Steel, Justice Brown said : "To justify the state in thus interposing its authority...oppressive upon individuals. The legislature may not, under the guise of protecting the public interests, arbitrarily interfere with private business or impose... | |
 | 1920 - 1058 sider
...viaducts, or even change tracks, if necessary for the protection of life and health, or for the good of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, there must be a fair and reasonable ground for it. A mere arbitrary act, although exercised under the... | |
 | Ohio State Bar Association - 1911 - 282 sider
...utere tuo ut alienum non loedas, but its exercise is justified only when it appears that the interest of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, require it, and when the means used are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the desired end, and... | |
| |
To justify the State in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, first, that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, require such interference; and, second, that the means... 
