| 1916 - 502 sider
...NY 67. 96. »frllK*nce — Dangerous Instruments. — Handle of valve used to Hush toilets is not so reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril when negligently made as to require manufacturer to make it carefully under penalty of liability to persons other than immediate... | |
| 1916 - 510 sider
...67. 96. BTegrUg-enee — Dangerous Instruments. — Handle of valve used to flush toilets is not so reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril when negligently made as to require manufacturer to make it carefully under penalty of liability to persons other than immediate... | |
| Lyman P. Wilson - 1928 - 1130 sider
...conditions, are the tests and standards of our law. We hold, then, that the principle of Thomas v. Winchester is not limited to poisons, explosives and things of like nature, to things which in their normal nature are implements of destruction. If the nature of a thing is such__that it is reasonably certai"... | |
| 1927 - 236 sider
...of themselves? Judge Cardozo wrote extending the law to include them, saying: "If the nature of the thing is such that it is reasonably certain to place life and limb in danger when negligently made, it is then a thing of danger." The Court of Appeals had held the statute... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Government Operations - 1966 - 710 sider
...finished product placed on the market by a manufacturer to be used without inspection by his consumer is such that it is reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril if the product is negligently made, it is then a thing of danger. Its nature gives warning of the consequences... | |
| 1924 - 524 sider
...Minnesota case before the Buick decision,12 the best statement of it is still embodied in that case. "If the nature of a thing is such that it is reasonably...in peril when negligently made, it is then a thing •Devlin v. Smith, 89 NY 470 (1882). <Kahner v. Otis Elevator Co., 96 App. Div. (NY) 169 (1904). •Statler... | |
| Thorpe - 1979 - 126 sider
...became a Supreme Court justice, held that the manufacturer's liability did extend to the user, because "If the nature of a thing is such that it is reasonably...life and limb in peril when negligently made, it is a thing of danger; and if to the element of danger there is added knowledge that the thing will be... | |
| John S. Allee, Theodore V. H. Mayer, Robb W. Patryk - 1984 - 1216 sider
...dangerous," can provide the basis for recovery in negligence by a person lacking privity if the product "is reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril when negligently made" and "there is added knowledge that the thing will be used by persons other than the purchaser, and... | |
| |