...error. AH Garland, for plaintiff in error. Solictor- General Maxwell, for the United States. BREWER, J., after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. The facts of this case presented a proper question for the consideration of the jury as to whether the...

...and Ewing & Southard, for complainant. CM Osborn and SU Pinney, for defendants. Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. It will be seen from the above statement that the grant in the eighth section of the act of the Wisconsin...

...against the United States. Alex. Porter Morse, for the United States. John Wharton Clark, for appellee. Mr. Justice PECKHAM, after stating the facts In the...foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. There Is here but a single question for this court to review, and that relates to the right of the...

...Charles S. Albert, for plaintiffs In error. James E. Markham and HW Phillips, for defendant In error. Mr. Justice PECKHAM, after stating the facts In the...foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court It is claimed upon the part of the plaintiffs la error that by the decision of the court below they...

...companies." JL Carney, for plaintiff In error. DD Cbase, for defendant in error. Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts In the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. It must be assumed upon the record before us that Boak had authority from the defendant to prosecute...

...for appellants. Jas. K. Hill, Henry T. Winy, and Harrington Putnam, for appellee. Mr. Justice HARTAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. 1. The district court correctly held, upon the evidence, that at the time of the transfer by Theodore...

...WiseGarnett, forplaintiff in error. MF Morris, for defendants in error. •> CI e Mr. Justice HAIU.AN, after stating the* facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. Although the record recites that the case was heard upon the pleadings and evidence, it does not appear...

...Bradford and Ernest W. Bradford, for appellant. Wm. Hubbell Fisher, for appellees. Mr. Justice BROWN, after stating the facts In the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. Beds of clay are composed of different strata, and the first step necessary to be ^ taken In the manufacture...

...for the United States. Thomas J. Sommes and Wm. A. Maury, for appellees. Mr. Chief Justice FULLER, after stating the facts In the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. In respect of these importations, It must be assumed that the bags were not, in fact, all of American...

...testimony. James Loumdes, for plaintiff in error. DT Watson, for defendants in error. Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. g The lirst assignment of error relates to the instructions upon the general • question whether the...