United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 543United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 2004 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 51
Side 190
... Sixth Amendment rights that makes the adversary process itself presumptively unrelia- ble . " Id . , at 659 ; see Bell v . Cone , 535 U. S. 685 , 696-697 ( 2002 ) ( for Cronic's presumed prejudice standard to apply , counsel's " failure ...
... Sixth Amendment rights that makes the adversary process itself presumptively unrelia- ble . " Id . , at 659 ; see Bell v . Cone , 535 U. S. 685 , 696-697 ( 2002 ) ( for Cronic's presumed prejudice standard to apply , counsel's " failure ...
Side 220
... Sixth Amendment and instructed the District Court either to sentence Booker within the sentencing range supported by the jury's findings or to hold a separate sentencing hearing before a jury . In re- spondent Fanfan's case , the ...
... Sixth Amendment and instructed the District Court either to sentence Booker within the sentencing range supported by the jury's findings or to hold a separate sentencing hearing before a jury . In re- spondent Fanfan's case , the ...
Side 221
... Sixth Amendment as construed in Blakely applies to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines . Pp . 230-244 . Be- ( a ) In addressing Washington State's determinate sentencing scheme , the Blakely Court found that Jones v . United States , 526 ...
... Sixth Amendment as construed in Blakely applies to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines . Pp . 230-244 . Be- ( a ) In addressing Washington State's determinate sentencing scheme , the Blakely Court found that Jones v . United States , 526 ...
Side 222
... Sixth Amendment principles apply to the Sentencing Guidelines . Further , the Court's pre - Apprendi cases considering the Guidelines are inapplicable , as they did not consider the application of Apprendi to the Sentencing Guidelines ...
... Sixth Amendment principles apply to the Sentencing Guidelines . Further , the Court's pre - Apprendi cases considering the Guidelines are inapplicable , as they did not consider the application of Apprendi to the Sentencing Guidelines ...
Side 225
... Sixth Amendment holding and the Court's remedial interpretation of the Sentencing Act must be applied to all cases on direct review . See , e . g . , Griffith v . Ken- tucky , 479 U. S. 314 , 328. That does not mean that every sentence ...
... Sixth Amendment holding and the Court's remedial interpretation of the Sentencing Act must be applied to all cases on direct review . See , e . g . , Griffith v . Ken- tucky , 479 U. S. 314 , 328. That does not mean that every sentence ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
11th Cir alien amici curiae applied Apprendi Appx Ashcroft Attorney Aviall BREYER Brief C. A. 3d Cir C. A. 9th Cir California capital punishment Certio Certiorari denied Circuit claim clause Code Ann Congress constitutional contract Corp CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS Court of Appeals crime CRIMINAL JUSTICE Crosby Curiam death penalty decision defendant defendant's Dept dissenting Dist District Court Dretke Eighth Amendment evidence fact federal filed Florida Fourth Amendment GINSBURG Government Hamburg Süd Himalaya Clause Ibid Illinois inmates issue Johnson Jones judge judgment jury juvenile Kansas Lexis liability ment Nixon O'CONNOR offense opinion petitioner petitioner's prison provision punishment racial rari denied reason remanded Reported requirement respondent rule SCALIA sion Sixth Amendment Stat statute statutory STEVENS strict scrutiny subparagraph Supp supra Supreme Court Texas THOMAS tion tiorari denied trial U.S. October United UNITED STATES 95 violation Virginia WARDEN Zadvydas