United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 543United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 2004 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 12
... ment urges , would leave § 101 ( h ) ( 3 ) practically devoid of sig- nificance . As we must give effect to every word of a statute wherever possible , see Duncan v . Walker , 533 U. S. 167 , 174 ( 2001 ) , the distinct provision for ...
... ment urges , would leave § 101 ( h ) ( 3 ) practically devoid of sig- nificance . As we must give effect to every word of a statute wherever possible , see Duncan v . Walker , 533 U. S. 167 , 174 ( 2001 ) , the distinct provision for ...
Side 77
... ment employer may impose restraints on employee speech , the employ- ees have the right to speak on matters of public concern , typically those concerning government policies of interest to the public at large , see Connick v . Myers ...
... ment employer may impose restraints on employee speech , the employ- ees have the right to speak on matters of public concern , typically those concerning government policies of interest to the public at large , see Connick v . Myers ...
Side 80
... ment and had no effect on the mission and purpose of the employer . The question was whether the Federal Govern- ment could impose certain monetary limitations on outside Per Curiam earnings from speaking or writing on a class 80 SAN ...
... ment and had no effect on the mission and purpose of the employer . The question was whether the Federal Govern- ment could impose certain monetary limitations on outside Per Curiam earnings from speaking or writing on a class 80 SAN ...
Side 86
... ment interest on damages for losses incurred from 1969 through 1994 . The Court subsequently adopted these recommendations with one ex- ception : It held that prejudgment interest would run from 1985 ( not 1969 ) . Kansas v . Colorado ...
... ment interest on damages for losses incurred from 1969 through 1994 . The Court subsequently adopted these recommendations with one ex- ception : It held that prejudgment interest would run from 1985 ( not 1969 ) . Kansas v . Colorado ...
Side 88
... ment of the award in Kansas ' favor . Ibid . Pp . 95-99 . 3. Kansas ' exception to the Special Master's recommendation that the H - I Model be used with a 10 - year measurement period to determine Colorado's future Compact compliance is ...
... ment of the award in Kansas ' favor . Ibid . Pp . 95-99 . 3. Kansas ' exception to the Special Master's recommendation that the H - I Model be used with a 10 - year measurement period to determine Colorado's future Compact compliance is ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
11th Cir alien amici curiae applied Apprendi Appx Ashcroft Attorney Aviall BREYER Brief C. A. 3d Cir C. A. 9th Cir California capital punishment Certio Certiorari denied Circuit claim clause Code Ann Congress constitutional contract Corp CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS Court of Appeals crime CRIMINAL JUSTICE Crosby Curiam death penalty decision defendant defendant's Dept dissenting Dist District Court Dretke Eighth Amendment evidence fact federal filed Florida Fourth Amendment GINSBURG Government Hamburg Süd Himalaya Clause Ibid Illinois inmates issue Johnson Jones judge judgment jury juvenile Kansas Lexis liability ment Nixon O'CONNOR offense opinion petitioner petitioner's prison provision punishment racial rari denied reason remanded Reported requirement respondent rule SCALIA sion Sixth Amendment Stat statute statutory STEVENS strict scrutiny subparagraph Supp supra Supreme Court Texas THOMAS tion tiorari denied trial U.S. October United UNITED STATES 95 violation Virginia WARDEN Zadvydas