United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 543United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 2004 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 76
Side 11
... punishment and other crimes . See United States v . Lucio - Lucio , 347 F. 3d 1202 , 1205-1206 ( CA10 2003 ) . Section 16 therefore cannot be read to include petitioner's conviction for DUI causing serious bodily injury under Flor- ida ...
... punishment and other crimes . See United States v . Lucio - Lucio , 347 F. 3d 1202 , 1205-1206 ( CA10 2003 ) . Section 16 therefore cannot be read to include petitioner's conviction for DUI causing serious bodily injury under Flor- ida ...
Side 37
... punishment phase of petitioner's capital murder trial allowed the Texas jury to give effect to his mitigation evidence only by negating what would otherwise be affirmative responses to two special issues relating to deliberateness and ...
... punishment phase of petitioner's capital murder trial allowed the Texas jury to give effect to his mitigation evidence only by negating what would otherwise be affirmative responses to two special issues relating to deliberateness and ...
Side 38
... not harm , his other former co- worker before exiting with his friends . The jury found peti- tioner guilty of capital murder beyond a reasonable doubt . Per Curiam At the punishment phase , the jury was 38 SMITH v . TEXAS.
... not harm , his other former co- worker before exiting with his friends . The jury found peti- tioner guilty of capital murder beyond a reasonable doubt . Per Curiam At the punishment phase , the jury was 38 SMITH v . TEXAS.
Side 39
... punishment phase , the jury was instructed on two special issues : first , whether the killing was deliberate ; and second , whether the defendant posed a continuing danger to others.1 Approximately two years prior to the trial , we had ...
... punishment phase , the jury was instructed on two special issues : first , whether the killing was deliberate ; and second , whether the defendant posed a continuing danger to others.1 Approximately two years prior to the trial , we had ...
Side 41
... punishment phase , the prosecution reminded the jury of its duty to answer truth- fully the two special issues of deliberateness and future dangerousness . Per Curiam " Now , when we talked to you Cite as : 543 U. S. 37 ( 2004 ) 41.
... punishment phase , the prosecution reminded the jury of its duty to answer truth- fully the two special issues of deliberateness and future dangerousness . Per Curiam " Now , when we talked to you Cite as : 543 U. S. 37 ( 2004 ) 41.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
11th Cir alien amici curiae applied Apprendi Appx Ashcroft Attorney Aviall BREYER Brief C. A. 3d Cir C. A. 9th Cir California capital punishment Certio Certiorari denied Circuit claim clause Code Ann Congress constitutional contract Corp CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS Court of Appeals crime CRIMINAL JUSTICE Crosby Curiam death penalty decision defendant defendant's Dept dissenting Dist District Court Dretke Eighth Amendment evidence fact federal filed Florida Fourth Amendment GINSBURG Government Hamburg Süd Himalaya Clause Ibid Illinois inmates issue Johnson Jones judge judgment jury juvenile Kansas Lexis liability ment Nixon O'CONNOR offense opinion petitioner petitioner's prison provision punishment racial rari denied reason remanded Reported requirement respondent rule SCALIA sion Sixth Amendment Stat statute statutory STEVENS strict scrutiny subparagraph Supp supra Supreme Court Texas THOMAS tion tiorari denied trial U.S. October United UNITED STATES 95 violation Virginia WARDEN Zadvydas