United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 543United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 2004 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 99
Side 37
... trial allowed the Texas jury to give effect to his mitigation evidence only by negating what would otherwise be affirmative responses to two special issues relating to deliberateness and future dangerousness . Pursuant to this ...
... trial allowed the Texas jury to give effect to his mitigation evidence only by negating what would otherwise be affirmative responses to two special issues relating to deliberateness and future dangerousness . Pursuant to this ...
Side 39
... trial , we had held that presenting only these two special issues , with- out additional instructions regarding the jury's duty to con- sider mitigation evidence , violated the Eighth Amendment . Penry v . Lynaugh , 492 U. S. 302 , 328 ...
... trial , we had held that presenting only these two special issues , with- out additional instructions regarding the jury's duty to con- sider mitigation evidence , violated the Eighth Amendment . Penry v . Lynaugh , 492 U. S. 302 , 328 ...
Side 42
... trial court in 1998. That suit was dismissed as untimely , but the Texas Legislature amended its criminal code in such a way as to allow petitioner to file a timely writ . Petitioner did so , claiming that his jury was instructed in ...
... trial court in 1998. That suit was dismissed as untimely , but the Texas Legislature amended its criminal code in such a way as to allow petitioner to file a timely writ . Petitioner did so , claiming that his jury was instructed in ...
Side 43
... trial court's failure to issue a sup- plemental mitigation instruction that would allow the jury to give full effect to his evidence rendered his death sentence unconstitutional . The state court and the Fifth Circuit both held that the ...
... trial court's failure to issue a sup- plemental mitigation instruction that would allow the jury to give full effect to his evidence rendered his death sentence unconstitutional . The state court and the Fifth Circuit both held that the ...
Side 45
... trial court to empower the jury with a vehicle capable of giving effect to that evidence . Whether the " nul- lification instruction " satisfied that charge is the question to which we now turn . III The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ...
... trial court to empower the jury with a vehicle capable of giving effect to that evidence . Whether the " nul- lification instruction " satisfied that charge is the question to which we now turn . III The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
11th Cir alien amici curiae applied Apprendi Appx Ashcroft Attorney Aviall BREYER Brief C. A. 3d Cir C. A. 9th Cir California capital punishment Certio Certiorari denied Circuit claim clause Code Ann Congress constitutional contract Corp CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS Court of Appeals crime CRIMINAL JUSTICE Crosby Curiam death penalty decision defendant defendant's Dept dissenting Dist District Court Dretke Eighth Amendment evidence fact federal filed Florida Fourth Amendment GINSBURG Government Hamburg Süd Himalaya Clause Ibid Illinois inmates issue Johnson Jones judge judgment jury juvenile Kansas Lexis liability ment Nixon O'CONNOR offense opinion petitioner petitioner's prison provision punishment racial rari denied reason remanded Reported requirement respondent rule SCALIA sion Sixth Amendment Stat statute statutory STEVENS strict scrutiny subparagraph Supp supra Supreme Court Texas THOMAS tion tiorari denied trial U.S. October United UNITED STATES 95 violation Virginia WARDEN Zadvydas