 | William David Evans - 1802 - 364 sider
...not to snake a diviw <lend. Lord Mansfield faid, " that the general ruk •had always been, that i! a man has actually paid what the law would not have compelled him to tpay, but what in equity and confcience he ought, he cannot recover it back again in an aftion for... | |
 | Robert Joseph Pothier - 1806 - 728 sider
...fet-off at the time of making the payment, and Lord Mansfield faid, that the rule had always been, that if a man has actually paid what the law would...equity and confcience he ought, he cannot recover it in an anión for money had and received ; fo when a man has paid a debt which would- otherwife have... | |
 | Sir Thomas Edlyne Tomlins - 1812 - 736 sider
...contract. Tenant v. Elliot. 1 B. &. P. 3. Farmer v. -Rüssel Sf al. 1 B. & P. 2.96 4. Where a man ha< actually paid what the law would not have compelled him to pay, but what in equity and conscience he ought to pay, he cannot recover it back again in an action for money had and received.... | |
 | Nicholas Baylies - 1814 - 576 sider
...(See tit. AGREEMENTS П. anteTl. and Cotton v. ThurUmd. 5 Term Rep. 403, &c. tit. WAGER.) 19. Where a man has actually paid what the law would not have compelled him to pay, but what in equity and conscience lie ought to pay, he cannot recover it back again in an action for money had and received.... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford - 1817 - 872 sider
...principle of the case of Grove and Dubois (a). And Lord MANSFIELD, Ch. J. said, The rule had always been, that if a man has actually paid what the law would...have compelled him to pay, but what in equity and conscience he ought, he cannot recover it back again in an action for money had and (:) Ante, ill.... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford, Sir Edward Hyde East - 1817 - 870 sider
...of the case of Grove and Dubois (a). And Lord MANSFIELD, Ch. J. said, The rule had always been, thtt if a man has actually paid what the law would not have compelled him to pay, but what in equity and conscience he ought, he cannot recover it back again in an action for money had and (a) Ante, in. received.... | |
 | Maryland. Court of Appeals, Thomas Harris, Reverdy Johnson - 1825 - 614 sider
...Mansfield, in delivering the opinion of the court, is reported to have said, "the rule had always been, that if a man has actually paid, what the law would...have compelled him to pay, but what in equity and Conscience he ought, he cannot recover it back again in an action for money had and received. But where... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1833 - 916 sider
...to rip up the matter, and recover back the money." In Bize v. Dickeson (c), it was held, that, where a man has actually paid what the law would not have compelled him to pay, but what in equity and conscience he ought, he cannot recover it back again in an action for money had and received ; and... | |
 | 1841 - 522 sider
...and hie Honor said he approved of the observations of Lord Mnnifield'm Bize v. Dickition, l TR 286, "that if a man has actually paid what the law would...have compelled him to pay, but what in equity and conscience he ought, he cannot recover it back again in an action for money had and received. t>o where... | |
| |
The rule has always been, that if a man has actually paid what the law would not have compelled him to pay, but what in equity and conscience he ought, he cannot recover it back again in an action for money had and received. 
