Oversight of Federal Trade Commission Law Enforcement: Fiscal Years 1982 and 1983 : Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session, November 9, 1983U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984 - 1076 sider |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action advertising agency analysis anticompetitive antitrust enforcement antitrust laws Association attorney BARNARD Baxter believe Bureau Director Bureau of Competition Bureau of Consumer Bureau of Economics Burlington Burlington Coat Factory catalog showrooms Chairman Miller civil penalties Commissioner Pertschuk complaints Congress consent orders consumer protection cost Credit decision delay discount discrimination economists effect enforcement activities fair trade Federal Trade Commission filed fiscal FTC's Horizontal mergers HORIZONTAL RESTRAINTS industry issues K mart Corp law enforcement litigation manufacturers marketplace mart ment merchandise MERGERS Horizontal Miller administration mission MONOPOLIZATION National practices Price discrimination price fixing Primary Violation Code proposed question recommendations regional offices reports request requires resale price fixing resale price maintenance response retail rule rulemaking small businesses staff statement subcommittee sumer Supreme Court tion Vertical price fixing VERTICAL RESTRAINTS Violation Description Washington
Populære avsnitt
Side 647 - In the absence of any purpose to create or maintain a monopoly, the act does not restrict the long recognized right of the trader or manufacturer engaged in an entirely private business, freely to exercise his own independent discretion as to parties with whom he will deal. And, of course, he may announce in advance the
Side 140 - to investigate, from time to time, trade conditions in and with foreign countries where associations, combinations, or practices of manufacturers, merchants, or traders, or other conditions, may affect the foreign trade of the United States, and to report to Congress thereon, with such recommendations as it deems advisable.
Side 562 - Act 14 to exempt from the Sherman Act "agreements prescribing minimum prices for the resale of a [brand name] commodity which ... is in free and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others" when such agreements would be lawful in the state of resale. 15 State legislation authorizing
Side 755 - so as to make available, so far as possible, to all the people of the United States a rapid, efficient. Nation-wide, world-wide wire and radio communication service with adequate facilities at reasonable charges
Side 351 - file an initial decision containing appropriate findings and conclusions and an appropriate order disposing of the proceeding. In such answer you may, however, reserve the right to submit proposed findings and conclusions and the right to appeal the initial decision to the Commission under Section 3.52 of the Commission's Rules of
Side 336 - have the power to gather and compile information concerning, and to investigate from time to time, the organization, business, conduct, practices, and management of any corporation engaged in commerce except
Side 714 - Testimony by James C. Miller, III on "Intercity Bus Regulatory Reform" before the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (attaching Bureau of Consumer Protection and Bureau of Economics comments on HR 3663, the Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1981).
Side 207 - House of Representatives. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 3/8/82 Testimony by James C. Miller III on 'Intercity Bus Regulatory Reform* before the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (attaching Bureau of Consumer Protection and Bureau of Economics comments on HR 3663, the Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1981). , House Judiciary Committee
Side 561 - (2) the effects of resale price fixing imposed by a manufacturer are the same as if distributors collectively agreed upon a fixed price. 6 In sum, the Supreme Court concluded: "[Dr. Miles] having sold its product at the prices satisfactory to itself, the public is entitled to whatever advantage may be derived from competition in the subsequent traffic.
Side 559 - United States v. Joint-Traffic Assn.. 171 US 505 (1898); United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co., 85 Fed. 271 (6th Cir. 1898), aff'd, 175 US 211 (1899); United States v. Trenton Potteries Co., 273 US 392 (1927) and United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 US 150 (1940).