... no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against any person by any original process or proceeding in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, but where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact that the action... The Federal Reporter - Side 2921892Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
| United States. Supreme Court - 1940 - 894 sider
...any original process or proceeding in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant; but where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact...residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant." Opinion of the Court. 308U.S. the locality of a law suit—the place where judicial authority may be... | |
| 1888 - 564 sider
...procedure in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, unless the jurisdiction of the court is founded only on the fact that the action is between citizens of different States, then the suit must be brought in the district where the plaintiff or the defendant resides. Nor can... | |
| 1921 - 496 sider
...also as to the question wnetner tne general provision thus quuted is limited by the subsequent § 51, "Where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact...residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant." It often happens that a suit is brought in a State Court between citizens of different States in a... | |
| Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1903 - 612 sider
...in dispute exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum or value of $2,000 ; and provides that, 'where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact...residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant.' 24 Stat. 552, 25 Stat. 433 [US Comp. St. 1901, p. 514]. The circuit courts of the United States are... | |
| Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1904 - 598 sider
...sufficient under the acts of Congress, that court has jurisdiction, although it may not be brought in the district of the residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant. The essential jurisdictional facts in such a case are the diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy.... | |
| American Bar Association - 1887 - 460 sider
...procedure in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, unless the jurisdiction of the court is founded only on the fact that the action is between citizens of different States ; then the suit must be brought in the district where the plaintiff or the defendant resides. Nor can... | |
| American Bar Association - 1921 - 1066 sider
...provisions of Section 51, conferring original jurisdiction upon the federal district courts. This provides : Where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact that the action is hetween citizens of different states, suits shall he hrought only in the district of the residence... | |
| 1893 - 2192 sider
...and is a citizen of that division. He is a citizen of this district, and the law provides: "But where jurisdiction is founded only on the fact that the...residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant." The terms of the law are clear and unambiguous. The suit must be brought in the district, not in any... | |
| 1902 - 1128 sider
...first section of the amendatory act of August 13, 1888 (25 Stat. 433), it is declared that, "where jurisdiction is founded only on the fact that the...residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant." In support of the 13. Citizenship of corporations for purpose of federal jurisdiction, see note to... | |
| 1894 - 2096 sider
...whereof he is an inhabitant; but, where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact that the case is between citizens of different states, suit shall...residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant." The suit here being for an alleged infringement of patent granted by the United States, the court has... | |
| |