 | Samuel Owen - 1845 - 434 sider
...il the complainant subjects the defendant to useless expense by proceeding by attachment instead of an order to show cause why the defendant should not be punished for his misconduct, the court may refuse to allow him the extra costs of such proceedings by attachment. In the case under... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Chancery, Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1847 - 768 sider
...before the court to show cause. The statute authorizes the court to proceed either by attachment, or by an order to show cause why the defendant should not be punished for his alleged misconduct. (2 /?. & 536, § 5.) It is regular, therefore, to take the order in either form.... | |
 | 1921 - 1056 sider
...appeal are the following: On May 4, 1920, the plaintiffs filed a petition in the District Court and obtained an order to show cause why the defendant should not be adjudged guilty of contempt, or, in the alternative, why a further injunction should not issue restraining... | |
 | Eugene St. Julien Cox - 1882 - 1146 sider
...in his presence at the time a certain case — the case of Coster vs. Coster, was before him, upon an order to show cause why the defendant should not be punished for not paying over suit money or alimony ? A. Yes, sir, I was present. Q. Will you state where you found... | |
 | Eugene St. Julien Cox - 1882 - 1064 sider
...have forgotten which, but it was an ortler to pay over money, — that money had not been paid and an order to show cause why the defendant should not be punished as for a contempt had been duly made, served and returnable on that day ; that upon that day the parties... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 848 sider
...was heard beJow, consisting of — 1st. The bill, answer, replication, decree and injunction, and the order to show cause why the defendant should not be punished for contempt. 2d. A statement of facts deduced by the court below from the evidence in the case, and the... | |
 | 1885 - 1232 sider
...was heard below, consisting of— (1) The bill, answer, replication, decree, and injunction, and the order to show cause why the defendant should not be punished for contempt. (2) A statement of facts deduced by the court below from the evidence in the case, and the... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1886 - 614 sider
...heard below, consisting of — 1st. The bill, answer, replication, decree, and injunction, and the order to show cause why the defendant should not be punished for contempt. 2d. A statement of facts deduced by the court below from the evidence in the case and the... | |
 | 1920 - 1070 sider
...made for the payment of the sum of $530 due for alimony under the said decree. Payment being refused, an order to show cause why the defendant should not be punished for a contempt of court was served. The learned justice at Special Term denied the motion, upon the ground... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1890 - 718 sider
...heard below, consisting of — 1st. The bill, answer, replication, decree, and injunction, and the order to show cause why the defendant should not be punished for contempt. Opinion of the court. 2d. A statement of facts deduced by the court below from the evidence... | |
| |
The bill, answer, replication, decree and injunction, and the order to show cause why the defendant should not be punished for contempt. 
