To Amend the Federal Trade Commission Act. Hearing ... on H.R. 3143 ... Feb. 18 and 19, 1937 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 31
Side 3
... present , representing the Federal Trade Commission , and we will now hear from him . STATEMENT OF HON . EWIN L. DAVIS , ACCOMPANIED BY MR . GARLAND S. FERGUSON , COMMISSIONER , AND MR . WILLIAM T. KELLEY , CHIEF COUNSEL , FEDERAL TRADE ...
... present , representing the Federal Trade Commission , and we will now hear from him . STATEMENT OF HON . EWIN L. DAVIS , ACCOMPANIED BY MR . GARLAND S. FERGUSON , COMMISSIONER , AND MR . WILLIAM T. KELLEY , CHIEF COUNSEL , FEDERAL TRADE ...
Side 4
... present act . Commissioner DAVIS . Yes , sir ; I will undertake to do that . Mr. BOREN . I would appreciate it . Commissioner DAVIS . Yes . As I said , the first amendment to sec- tion 5 of the present act is the addition of the words ...
... present act . Commissioner DAVIS . Yes , sir ; I will undertake to do that . Mr. BOREN . I would appreciate it . Commissioner DAVIS . Yes . As I said , the first amendment to sec- tion 5 of the present act is the addition of the words ...
Side 7
... present law it is " unfair method of competition " -or in this case the courts would finally decide as to whether the facts constitute an unfair or deceptive practice . Mr. KENNEY . Well , would overcharging be an unfair practice under ...
... present law it is " unfair method of competition " -or in this case the courts would finally decide as to whether the facts constitute an unfair or deceptive practice . Mr. KENNEY . Well , would overcharging be an unfair practice under ...
Side 8
... present state of the law , then why would it not be possible , Judge , for a concern by unfair or deceptive acts to destroy fair competition and thereby render itself immune from the jurisdiction of the Commission ? Would that not be ...
... present state of the law , then why would it not be possible , Judge , for a concern by unfair or deceptive acts to destroy fair competition and thereby render itself immune from the jurisdiction of the Commission ? Would that not be ...
Side 9
... present act ? Commissioner DAVIS . Mr. Mapes , as I was intending to explain when I got to the other amendments , the word " evidence " all through the section is underscored for the reason that it is substituted for the word ...
... present act ? Commissioner DAVIS . Mr. Mapes , as I was intending to explain when I got to the other amendments , the word " evidence " all through the section is underscored for the reason that it is substituted for the word ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
acts and practices Acts to regulate Association of Manufacturers believe BOREN BULWINKLE catalog cease and desist CHAIRMAN CHAPMAN circuit court CLARENCE F Clayton Act COLE Commis Commissioner DAVIS committee common carriers Communications Act competitors Congress Congressman court of appeals CROSSER DALEY deceptive acts deceptive practices define definition desist orders EICHER enforcement evidence fact false advertising FEBRUARY 19 Federal Communications Commission Federal Trade Commission HALLECK hearing HOSHOUR industry injury Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Act Judge Davis jurisdiction KENNEY Lazo legislation MAPES matter ment methods of competition mission National Association Packers person practices in commerce present bill procedure proceeding proposed amendment public interest purpose question Raladam Raladam Co reason reference respondent statement Stockyards Act Supreme Court thing tion Trade Commission Act unfair and deceptive unfair competition unfair methods unfair or deceptive unfair practice unlawful violation WADSWORTH
Populære avsnitt
Side 3 - Commission, and enforcing the same to the extent that such order is affirmed and to issue such writs as are ancillary to its jurisdiction or are necessary in its judgment to prevent injury to the public or to competitors pendente lite.
Side 3 - If either party shall apply to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence, and shall show to the satisfaction of the court that such additional evidence is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to adduce such evidence in the proceeding...
Side 4 - Complaints, orders, and other processes of the Commission under this section may be served by anyone duly authorized by the Commission, either (a) by delivering a copy thereof to the person to be served, or to a member of the partnership to be served, or the president, secretary, or other executive officer or a director...
Side 3 - Until a transcript of the record in such hearing shall have been filed in a circuit court of appeals of the United States, as hereinafter provided, the commission or board may at any time, upon such notice and in such manner as it shall deem proper, modify or set aside, in whole or in part, any report or any order made or issued by it under this section.
Side 3 - Such proceedings in the circuit court of appeals shall be given precedence over other cases pending therein, and shall be in every way expedited. No order of the Commission or judgment of court to enforce the same shall in any wise relieve or absolve any person, partnership, or corporation from any liability under the Antitrust Acts.
Side 2 - An act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes...
Side 3 - ... resides or carries on business, for the enforcement of Its order, and shall certify and file with its application, a transcript of the entire record in the proceeding, including all the testimony taken and the report and order of...
Side 3 - Commission and to be adduced upon the hearing in such manner and upon such terms and conditions as to the court may seem proper. The Commission may modify its findings as to the facts, by reason of the additional evidence so taken, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive, and its recommendation, if any, for the modification or setting aside of the original order.
Side 2 - If upon such hearing the Commission shall be of the opinion that the method of competition or the act or practice in question is prohibited by this Act, it shall make a report in writing in which it shall state its findings as to the facts and shall issue and cause to be served on such person, partnership, or corporation an order requiring such person, partnership, or corporation to cease and desist from using such method of competition or such act or practice.
Side 2 - Whenever the commission shall have reason to believe that any such person, partnership, or corporation has been or is using any unfair method of competition in commerce and if it shall appear to the commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public, it shall issue and serve upon such person, partnership, or corporation a complaint...