Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER (C) Testimony of Parties or Persons In-1m267 (ind.) Extent of cross-examination

terested, for or against Representa: permitted is within sound discretion of trial tle or Interest of Persons Deceased court.-Henry v. State, 146 N. E. 822. or Incompetent.

emo 268(2) (ind.) Unfavorable inference, drawn

from facts elicited from witness, opens door Om 139(9) (III.) Parties in partition, not suing for admission on cross-examination of knowlas heirs, not incompetent as parties in inter- edge of witness tending to rebut such inferest.--Alward v. Woodard, 146 N E. 154. Cam 140(2) (11.) Interest disqualifying witness m269(1) (ind.) Opening of subject on ex

ence.--Henry v. State, 146 N. E. 822. must be such that pecuniary gain or loss will amination in chief opens it to full and detailed result from judgment or decree.-Britt v. Darnell, 146 N. E. 510.

investigation on cross-examination.-Henry v. Attorney for executor held not disqualified to State, 116 N. E. 822. testify for him by interest in litigation.--Id.

271 (3) (Mass.) Exception to refusal to Casa 14019) (III.) Husband of testatrix's heir permit letters to be read in evidence not well held incompetent to testify for contestants.

taken.-Hall v. Kotowski, 146 N. E. 717., Britt v. Darnell, 146 N. E. 510,

m 276 (Mass.) Permitting cross-examination Eww149(2) (III.) Devisees suing in partition in- of defendant as adverse witness as to statecompetent as to conservator for one of defendments made by chauffeur held not abuse of ants.---Alward v. Woodard, 146 N. E. 154.

discretion.-Walsh v. Feinstein, 146 N. E. 355. www 149(2) (III.) Grantee,

Cross-examination of party called as witness son of deceased

rests in court's discretion.-Id. grantor, is not competent witness for himself, in action by grantor's executor to set aside deed.-Standard Trust & Savings Bank V.

(C) Privilege of Witness. Carlson, 146 N. E. 446.

Oma 297 (Mass.) Witness not compelled to give Cimos 150(3) (11.) Devisees in suit for partition incriminating testimony.-Commonwealth cannot dispute rights under will of other dev- Vona, 146 N. E. 20. isees.--Alward v. Woodard, 146 N. E. 154.

Devisees competent to testify as to agree- IV. CREDIBILITY, IMPEACHMENT, CONment and declarations of father when making TRADICTION, AND CORROBORATION. advancement to son.-Id. Em 159(2) (III.) Coheir, suing in partition, not (D) Inconsistent statements by Witness. competent witness as to his release of expect-On379(2) (Mass.) Evidence of inconsistent ancy.-Alward v. Woodard, 146 N. E. 154. statements by commonwealth's witnesses as

eyewitnesses of killing properly admitted by (D) Confidential Relations and Privileged commonwealth to impeach them.-CommonCommunications.

wealth v. Festo, 146 N. E. 700. 221 (Ohio) When husband waived statute 388(10) (Ind.App.) Foundation for improhibiting privileged testimony, stated.—Ruch peachment of witness held insufficient.-Hutchv. State, 146 N. E. 67.

ens v. State, 146 N. E. 413.

[ocr errors]

III. EXAMINATION.

WORDS AND PHRASES. (A) Taking Testimony in General.

“Accident."-Industrial Commission of Ohio v. Cam 236(1) (111.) Question if witness knew

Russell (Ohio) 146 N. E. 305. whether alleged incompetent testatrix had mort- "Action at law.”—McBride v. University Club gage on home which she threatened to take away (Ohio) 146 N. E. 804. from owner, held permissible.-Britt v. Darneli, “Additional."---People v. Missouri Pac. R. Co. 146 N. E. 510.

(Ill.) 146 N. E. 567. ww240(1) (III.) Leading questions to be in- “Adulterated food." -Longbrake v. State (Ohio) competent must refer to material matters, and 146 N. E. 417. occur where no necessity for them appears.-- "Advancements.''-Alward v. Woodard (III.) People v. Schladweiler, 146 N. E. 525.

146 N. E. 154. Cuma 240(2) (11.) Whether necessity exists for “After."-Burrell v. Jean (Ind.) 146 N. E. 754. leading question is largely discretionary with “Alibi."—People v. Schladweiler (III.) 146 N. trial court.-People v. Schladweiler, 146 N. E. 525. E. 525.

“All others pursuing like occupations."-City Abuse of discretion in permitting leading of Rockford v. Nolan (Ill.) 146 N. E. 564. questions prejudicial error.-Id.

"Arising out of and in course of employment." Om 240 (3) (III.) Test as to "leading question” --Solar-Sturges Mfg. Co. v. Industrial Comstated.-People v. Schladweiler, 146 N. E. mission (111.) 146 N. E. 572; National Bis525.

cuit (o. v. Roth (Ind. App.) 146 N. E. 410. Om 242 (III.) Questions merely directing atten- "Arraignment."-Andrews v. State (Ind.) 146 tid of witness to subject-matter not sugges- N. E. 817. tive or leading.--People v. Schladweiler, 146 “Certified, audited, and paid."-Etzold v. Board N. E. 525.

of Com'rs of Huntington County (Ind. Om 243 (III.) Permitting children to

App.) 146 N. E. 842. questions over objections that they were lead- | "Chancery case.”_In Gurnea's Estate ing held not prejudicial error.-People

(Ohio) 146 X. E. 308; McBride v. University Schladweiler, 146 N. E. 525.

Club (Ohio) 146 V. E. S04. w255(1) (111.) Witness may refresh memory “Child."--Casper v. Helvie (Ind. App.) 116 by use of written memorandum or entry in N. E, 123. book.–People v. Krauser, 116 N. E. 593. "Children."--Casper v. Helvie (Ind. App.) 146 On 257 (II.) Permitting reading of stenograph- N. E. 123. ic notes of questions to accused at police sta- "C. i. f."- National Wholesale Grocery Co. v. tion, held without error.-People v. Krauser, Man (Mass.) 146 N. E. 791. 146 N. E. 593.

"Civil actions." —Herman v. City of New Bed

ford (Mass.) 146 N. E. 41. (B) Cross-Examination and Re-examina- | "Commercial car."-Fisher Bros. Co. v. Brown tion.

(Ohio) 146 N. E. 100. ww266 (Ind.) Cross-examination of witness is “Common carrier.”-Hissem v. Guran (Ohio) absolute right, denial of which on

material 146 N. E. 808. matter is reversible error.--Henry v. State, “Confession."—People v. Rupert (Ill.) 146 N. 146 N. E. 822.

E. 450. Refusal to permit cross-examination as to Conviction."-Commonwealth v. Baldi (Mass.) matters pertaining to investigation of accused's 146 N E. 11. connection with larceny held reversible error. “Copy.”—People v. Chicago & E. I. Ry. Co. -Id.

(II.) 116 N. E. 499.

answer

re

V.

V.

[ocr errors]

“Culpable neglect.”—Haven v. Smith (Mass.), "Owner."-Brush v. City of New Bedford 146 N. E. 18.

(Mass.) 146 N. E. 9; State v. Davis (Ohio) "Defect of parties.”-Rich v. Fry (Ind.) 146 146 N. E. 82. N. E. 393.

“Partnership."-Mitchell v. Gruener (Mass.) “Delivery order."—National Wholesale Gro 146 N. E. 252.

cery Co. v. Mann (Mass.) 146 N. E. 791, "Passenger car.”-Fisher Bros. Co. v. Brown "Disability."-Northern Indiana Power Co. v. (Ohio) 146 N. E. 100. Hawkins (Ind. App.) 146 N. E. 879.

Passengers.”—Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. R. “Drivers, chauffeurs, and riggers."-Palotta's Co. v. Jones (Ind. App.) 146 N. E. 864. Case (Mass.) 146 N. E. 235.

“Payment."-People v. Westerdahl (Ill.) 146 N. "Embezzlement.”—People V. Schrager (III.) E. 737. 146 N. E. 151.

"Penalty.”-Miller V. Blockberger (Ohio) 146 “Employer."-Trumbull Cliffs Furnace Co. v. N. E. 206. Shachovsky (Ohio) 146 N. E. 306.

"Perjury.”—Ruch v. State (Ohio) 146 N. E. “Entrails.”—Commonwealth v. Cohen (Mass.) 67. 146 N E. 228.

"Permanent abode.”-Anderson v. Pifer (Ill.) "Equitable defenses."-Susquehanna S. S. Co. 146 N. E. 171.

v. A. O. Andersen & Co. (N. Y.) 146 N. E. "Permission of town."-Inhabitants of Canton 381.

v. Westbourne Cemetery Corporation of "Estates less than freehold."-Fowler v. Mía Boston (Mass.) 146 V. E. 258.

rion & Pittsburg Coal Co. (III.) 146 N. E. “Person."- Madden Board of Election 318.

Com’rs of City of Boston (Mass.) 146 N. E. "Estoppel.”-General Realty Co. v. Silcox (Ind. 280. App.) 146 N. E. 408.

"Proceeding.”-Ruch v. State (Ohio) 146 N. E. "Extension."--Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry: 67.

('0. v. Commerce Commission (111.) 146 N. "Proceeding at law."-Petition of Forbes (I11.) E. 606.

146 N. E. 448. "Final decree."-Trebbin v. Thoeresz (Ill.) “Public officer.”-Hodsdon v. Weinstein (Mass.) 146 N. E. 542.

146 N. E. 675. "Final judgment."-In re Elm St. in City of "Public utility."--Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. New York (N. Y.) 146 N. E. 342.

Co. v. Commerce Commission (Ill.) 146 N. "Freehold estate."-Fowier v. Marion & Pitts E. 606. burg Coal Co. (Ill.) 146 X. E. 318.

“Purpose.”—People v. Tate (Ill.) 146 N. E. “General law.”—Hess v. Devou (Ohio) 146 N.

487. E. 311.

"Residence."-Anderson y. Pifer (Ill.) 146 N. "Good will.”—Jones v. Stevens (Ohio) 116 N.

E. 171. E. 894.

"Res judicata."-Burrell v. Jean (Ind.) 146 N. "Horse-power.”—Foltz Grocery & Baking Co. E. 754; Gohman v. City of St. Bernard

v. Brown (Ohio) 146 N. E. 97; Fisher Bros. (Ohio) 146 N. E. 291. Co. v. Brown (Ohio) 146 N. E. 100.

"Resulting trust.”—Rolofson v. Malone (III.) "Immediately."—Hall American Bankers' 146 V. E. 169. Ins. Co. (Ill.) 146 N. E. 137.

"Return."-Maxwell Implement Co. v. Fitzger"Impairment."-Northern Indiana Power Co.

ald (Ind. App.) 146 N. E. 883. v. Hawkins (Ind. App.) 146 N. E. 879. "Same offense.”—Duvall v. State (Ohio) 146 X.

E. 90. "Implied powers."-City of Rockford v. Nolan (III.) 146 N. E. 564.

"Severally.”—City of Momence v. Kirby (Ill.) “Insurance."-Brownell v. Board of Education “Some person other than employer."-Artifi

116 N. E. 142. of Inside Tax Dist. of City of Saratoga Springs (N. Y.) 146 N. E. 630.

cial Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Waltz (Ind. “Intent.”—People v. Tate (nl.) 146 N. E. 487.

App.) 146 N. E. 826. "Interested in estate."-Talbot v. Bush (Mass.)

"Soundness of mind."-Needham Trust Co. v. 146 N. E. 223.

Cookson (Mass.) 146 N. E. 268. "Issue."--Gallagher v. Sullivan (Mass.) 146

“Special assessments."-Carlyle Bartels

(Ill.) 146 N. E. 192. N. E. 769. "Larceny."-Van Vechten v. American Eagle

"Special franchise."--People ex rel. New York

Cent. R. Co. v. State Tax Commission (X. Fire Ins. Co. (N. Y.) 146 N. E. 432.

Y.) 146 N. E. 197. "Law of the case."-McCracken's Case (Mass.) "Spur track.”—Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry: 146 N. E. 304; Gohman v. City of St. Ber

Co. v. Commerce Commission (Ill.) 146 V. pard (Ohio) 146 N. E. 291.

E. 006. "Leading question." —l'eople v. Schladweiler “Subject to."— America Mfg. Co. v. Common(III.) 146 N. E. 525.

wealth (Mass.) 146 N. E. 801. "Licensee.”—Pennsylvania diR. Co. V. Vitti | "Subrogation."'--'I'ravelers' Ins. Co. 5. Brass (Ohio) 146 N. E. 91.

Goods Mfg. Co. (X. Y.) 146 N. E. 377. “Lien."-State v. Davis (Ohio) 146 N. E. 82.

“Suit in equity."--Petition of Forbes (III.) 146 "Liquidated damages."-Miller v. Blockberger X. E. 418.

(Ohio) 146 N. E. 206; Jones v. Stevens “Taxes."-Carlyle v. Bartels (Ill.) 146 N. E. (Ohio) 146 N. E. 894.

192. "Maintenance and repair."-Fisher Bros. Co. v. “Tender.”—Maxwell Implement Co. v. FitzgerBrown (Ohio) 146 N. E. 100.

ald (Ind. App.) 146 N. E. 883. "Mandamus."-State v. Nolte (Ohio) 146 N. “Theft."-Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire E. 51.

Ins. Co. (X. Y.) 146 V. E. 432. Marketable title.”—McCarty V. Lingham | “Towns."-Decatur v. Auditor of City of Pea(Ohio) 146 N. E. 64.

body (Mass.) 146 N. E. 360. "Wotor transportation company."-Hissem v. "Undue influence.”-Crane v. Hensler (Ind.) Guran (Ohio) 146 N. E. SOS.

146 N. E. 577. "Mutual credits."--Putnam v. Handy (Mass.) “Way."--Commonwealth v. Leone (Mass.) 146 116 N. E. 264.

V. E. 26. “Mutual debts.''--Putnam v. Handy (Mass.) | “When." -('ommonwealth V. Cohen (Dass. ) 116 N. E. 264.

116 N. E. 228. "Nurse."- Phillips v. Buffalo General Hospital “When dressed.”—Commonwealth Cohen (V. Y.) 140 N. E. 199.

(Mass.) 146 N. E. 228. "Offiial acts.”-American Guaranty Co. v. Mc. "Will and wish.”—Temple v. Russell (Mass.) Niece (Ohio) 146 N. E. 77.

116 N. E. 679. "Option to renew."-Fuchs v. Peterson (III.) | Willful misconduct.”—Durgin's Case (Mass.) 116 N. E. .1.30.

146 N. E. 694. "Orderly."--Phillips v. Buffalo General Hospi- *Wrecking."- Aurnhammer v. Brotherhood Acc. tal (N. Y.) 116 N. E. 199.

Co. (Mass.) 146 N. E. 47.

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
WORK AND LABOR.

WRIT OF ERROR.
On 24 (2) (N.Y.) Part payment cannot be prov. See Appeal and Error.
ed under a general denial.-Curry v. Mackenzie,
146 N. E. 375.

WRITS. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACTS.

See Certiorari; Execution; Injunction; Man

damus; Prohibition; Quo Warranto; ReSee Master and Servant, m348-419.

plevin.

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

575

[ocr errors]

I. N. E.

9. 1

111. N. E. 1 !11. N. E., III. N.E. 111. NE m. N, E. 111. N. E. Rep. Rep. Rep. Rep. Rep. Rep. | Rep. Rep. Rep. Rep. Rep. Rep. Rep. Rep. Pg. Vol. Pg. Pg. Vol. Pg. Pg. Vol. Pg. Pg. Vol. Pg Pg. Vol. Pg. Pg. Vol. Pg. Pg Vol. Pg. 25 145 600 104

145
801 186 146 187 271 146 192 362 146 465 454

146 449

145

440 32 145 711 106 145 810 199 146 146275 146 169 370 146 556461 146 606 577 145

521
40 145 657 115 145 814 204 146 135 282 146 178 377 116 543 478 146 518 589 146 532
49 145 660 120 145 804 211 146 130 293 146 321 385 146 510 485 146 593 592 146
58 145 692 124 145 606 214 146 174 304 146 132 404 146 461 521 146 451 597 146 504
64 145 622 128 145 724

226 146
131 312 146 318 411 146 501 532 146 492 600

469 71 145 695 129 145 806 228 146

140
146 166 417 146 478536

146 440 603 146 506 74 145 633 131 145 806 233 146 165 | 328 146 325 424 146 499 540 146 547 611 146 536 76 145

138 146 142 | 235 146 160 332 146 558 428 146 442 548 146 562 617 146 445
84 145 615 142 146 162 241 146 129 341 146 569 431 146 533 553 16 525 621 146
87 145 664

150
146 154 244 146 148 349

146 443

437

146 472 565 146 463 623 149 509 91 145 730 164 146 171 252 146 137 352 146 572 442 146 483 568 146 490 626

149 504 92 145 801 169 146 151 258 146 183 358 146 541 451 146 446 572 146 439 628 146 497 99 145 613 178 146 143 270 146 193 361 146 501

140

320

VOL. 315, ILLINOIS REPORTS

Page

214

Page
Aberdeen-Franklin Coal Co, v. City of Chi- Fekete v. City of East St. Louis (145 N. E.
cago (145 N. E. 613).
99 692)

58 Alward v. Woodard (146 N. E. 154). 150 Fowler v. Marion & Pittsburg Coal Co. Anderson v. Pifer (146 N. E. 171).

161
(146 N. E. 318)...

312

Freeman Coal Mining Co. v. Industrial
Britt v. Darnell (146 N. E. 510)........ 385 Commission (145 N. E. 615).

S4
Fuchs v. Peterson (146 N. E. 556).

370 Cahill v. Plumbers' Gas and Steam Fit

Fuller v. Fuller (146 N. E. 174)....
ters' and Helpers' Local 93 (146 N. E.
130)

211 Gage v. Village of Wilmette (146 N. Ę. Cales v. Dressler (146 N. E. 162). 142

325)

328 Cantway v. Cantway (146 N. E. 148).

244 Greenfield v. Feyreisen (146 N. E. 445). 617 Carlyle v. Bartels (146 N. E. 192).

271 Greenville, City of, v. Miller (146 N. E. Chicago German Hod Carriers' Union and

463)

565 Benevolent Soc. v. Security Trust & De

454 posit Co. (146 N. E. 135).

204 Haimowitz v. Miller (146 N. E. 449).
City of Greenville v. Miller (146 N. E. Hall v. American Bankers' Ins. Co. (146
463)

565
N. E. 137)...

252 City of Momence v. Kirby (146 N. E. 142) 138 Harris v. Etienne (146 N. E. 5471:

540 City of West Frankfort v. A. C. Marsh

Harrisburg Coal Mining Co. v. Industrial

377 Lodge No. 196, 1. 0. 0. F. (145 N. E.

Commission (146 N. E. 543) 32 Hoit v. Spodgrass (146 N. E. 562). 548

293 City of Winchester v. Ring (146 N. E. 541) 355 Hunter v. Troup (146 N. E, 321).... Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Com

362 merce Commission (146 N. E. 606)..... 461 Lasier v. Mayer (146 N. E. 465).. Coddington v. Bevan 115 N, E. 801). 92

Lehigh Stone Co, v. Industrial Commission Consumers' Co. v. Industrial Commission

(1-46 N. E. 533)...

431 (146 N. E. 539).

592

Lidikevicz v. Kopala (146 N. E. 461).... 404 Coutre v. Ermel (146 N. E. 501).

361 Cronk v. Gieseke (116 N. E. 478).

Miller v, Miller (146 N. E. 469).... 600

417 Cullen v. Yellow Cab Co. (146 N. E. 160) 235 Vinnie Creek Drainage Dist. v. Nation (146

N. E. 558)..

332 Moeller v. Miller (146 N. E. 449).

45+ Davis v. Industrial Commission (146 N. E. Momence, City of, v. Kirby (146 N. E. 341 112)

138 Department of Public Works and Buildings Murray v. Hagmann (146 N. E. 472).... 437 v. Engel (146 N. E. 521)..

577 Department of Public Works and Build- Old Colony Life Ins. Co. v. Hickman (146 ings of State of Illinois y. Sohin (116 X. E, 132).....

301 N. L, 518).....

478

Pearsall v. Murray (146 N. E. 472). 437 Ellrod v. Board of Education of St. Joseph People v. Beal (1.+5 E. 095)..

Community Iligh School Dist. No. 305 People v. Carpenter (145 N. E. 661). 87 (116 N. E. 195)..

270 People v. Dabney (116 N. E. 160)... 320 146 N.E.

(971)

711)

« ForrigeFortsett »