 In the absence of an intention clearly expressed or to be inferred from its language, or from the object or subject-matter or history of the enactment, the presumption is that Parliament does not design its statutes to operate beyond the territorial limits...  Fur Seal Arbitration - Side 84av Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration - 1895Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Sir Peter Benson Maxwell - 1875 - 500 sider
...or from the object or subject matter of the enactment, the presumption would be that Parliament did not design its Statutes to operate on them, beyond the territorial limits of the United Kingdom ($); and they are to be read as if words to that {a) Dig. 2, 1, 20. Lushington ; Cope v. Doherty, 4... | |
 | Francis Wharton - 1884 - 882 sider
...or from the object or subject-matter of the enactment, the presumption would be that parliament did not design its statutes to operate on them beyond the territorial limits of the United Kingdom (Rose v. Hinely, 4 Cranch, 241, per Marshall, C. J ; The Zollverein, Swab. 96, per Dr. Lushington;... | |
 | Gustav Adolf Endlich - 1888 - 970 sider
...manner as to admit of no other rational interpretation,"7] the presumption is that the Legislature does not design its statutes to operate on them, beyond the territorial limits of its jurisdiction («). They are, therefore, to be (a) See Niboyet v. Niboyet, 4 P. D. 19, per Brett,... | |
 | United States - 1897 - 518 sider
...exception, in the absence of an intention clearly expressed or to be inferred either from its o/cn language or from the object, or subject.matter, or...beyond the territorial limits of the United Kingdom. And at page 86, from the judgment of Dr. Lushington in the Zollverein, (Swab. R., p. 98): In endeavoring... | |
 | 1912 - 1024 sider
...passage from Maxwell on the Interpre.tation of Statutes, p. 212, viz. : In the absence of an intention clearly expressed or to be inferred either from its...beyond the territorial limits of the United Kingdom." The principle embodied in the passage was directly applicable to.the case in which it was cited, because... | |
 | Edward Betley Brown, L. S. Le Vernois, Esten Kenneth Williams - 1914 - 1016 sider
...Interpretation of Statutes, p. 13 — " In the absence of an intention clearly expressed, or to be inferred from its language, or from the object or subject-matter...Parliament does not design its statutes to operate beyond fhe territorial limits of the United Kingdom " — was applied by the Master of the Bolls in... | |
 | Sir Peter Benson Maxwell, Wyatt Wyatt-Paine - 1920 - 970 sider
...clearly expressed or to be inferred either from its language, or from the object or subject matter, or history of the enactment, the presumption is that...Parliament does not design its statutes to operate on its subjects beyond the territorial limits of the United Kingdom (a). They are, therefore, to be read,... | |
 | Paulus Aemilius Irving, Gordon Hunter, Robert Cassidy, Peter Secord Lampman, Oscar Chapman Bass, Edmund Cumming Senkler - 1926 - 642 sider
...Interpretation of Statutes, 6th Ed., p. 257, reading as follows, is cited: "In the absence of an intention clearly expressed or to be inferred either from its...Parliament does not design its statutes to operate beyond the territorial limits of the United Kingdom." Also the case of Jefferys v. Boosey (1854), 4... | |
 | International Labour Office - 1928 - 388 sider
...intention clearly expressed, or to be inferred from its language, or from the object or subject matter or history of the enactment, the presumption is that...Parliament does not design its Statutes to operate beyond the territorial limits of the United Kingdom. Continuing he said : Applying the proposition... | |
 | 1914 - 568 sider
...contract us.13 In Maxwell on the Interpretation of Statutes20 it is said: "In the absence of an intention clearly expressed or to be inferred either from its...if words to that effect had been inserted in them." In Re American Liability Insurance Co.21 the Workmen's Compensation statute of Massachusetts was held... | |
| |
