A Full and Arranged Digest of the Decisions in Common Law, Equity, and Admiralty, of the Courts of the United States: From the Oganization of the Government in 1789 to 1847, in the Supreme, Circuit, District and Admiralty Courts; Reported in Dallas, Cranch, Wheaton, Peters, and Howard's Supreme Court Reports; in Gallison, Mason, Paine, Peters, Washington, Wallace, Sumner, Story, Baldwin, Brockenbrough, and M'Lean's Circuit Court Reports; and in Bees, Ware, Peters, and Gilpin's District and Admiralty Reports, Volum 1
Lewis & Blood, 1860
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
A Full and Arranged Digest of the Decisions in Common Law, Equity ..., Volum 2
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1860
A Full and Arranged Digest of the Decisions in Common Law, Equity ..., Volum 1
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1854
accepted action admiralty agent agreement allowed amount answer appeal apply assignment attachment authority Bank bill bond bound brought cargo cause certified charge circuit court circumstances citizens claim common Cond condition congress considered constitution contract corporation Cranch creditors damages debt debtor decree deed defendant directed discharge district duties effect endorser entitled equity error established et al evidence execution exercise fact foreign give given granted ground held Ibid intention interest issue judges judgment jurisdiction jury land legislature limitations master ment necessary notice objection opinion original owner paid party passed payment performance person Peters plaintiff port possession principles proceedings proceeds prove provisions purchaser question reasonable received rule ship statute sufficient suit supreme court taken tion trust United unless vessel voyage Wash Wheat whole writ
Side 163 - States, and the decision is in favor of such their validity, or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of the constitution, or of a treaty, or statute of, or commission held under the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege or exemption specially set up or claimed by either party, under such clause of the said Constitution, treaty, statute or commission...
Side 161 - A final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity...
Side 417 - It has also been observed that an act of Congress ought never to be construed to violate the law of nations, if any other possible construction remains, and consequently can never be construed to violate neutral rights, or to affect neutral commerce, further than is warranted by the law of nations as understood in this country.
Side 395 - As men whose intentions require no concealment generally employ the words which most directly and aptly express the ideas they intend to convey, the enlightened patriots who framed our constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said.
Side 282 - An act to provide for the better security of the lives of passengers on board of vessels propelled in whole or in part by steam...
Side 197 - The testimony of any witness may be taken in any civil cause depending in a district or circuit court by deposition de bene esse, when the witness lives at a greater distance from the place of trial than one hundred miles...
Side 105 - That, though penal laws are to be construed strictly, they are not to be construed so strictly as to defeat the obvious intention of the legislature.
Side 214 - The government of the Union, then (whatever may be the influence of this fact on the case), is emphatically and truly a government of the people. In form and in substance it emanates from them. Its powers are granted by them, and are to be exercised directly on them, and for their benefit.
Side 369 - It is clear, there can be no common law of the United States. The federal government is composed of twenty-four sovereign and independent states; each of which may have its local usages, customs and common law. There is no principle which pervades the Union and has the authority of law, that is not embodied in the constitution or laws of the Union.
Side 163 - State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States...