...capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) in excess...hearing provided by statute; or (6) unwarranted by the Opinion of the Court. 345 U. 8. § 19 (a) of the Immigration Act of 1917 * makes the decision of the...

...found to be "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law" or "in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right." §§ 706(2)(A) and (C). Opinion of the Court 464 US 166 (1971)." Guided by these principles, we turn...

...capricious, and abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) in excess...in any case subject to the requirements of sections 1006 and 1007 of this title or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute;...

...reliable, probative, and substantial evidence," from the power in reviewing courts to set aside actions unsupported by substantial evidence in any case subject to the requirements of sections 7 and 8 of the APA, and from the right of parties to administrative proceedings "to conduct such cross-examination...

...law; (E) unsupported by substantial evidence in a case subject to sections 556 and 557 of this title or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (F) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing...

...not in accordance with law; (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (D) without observance of procedure required by law; 62 Agric. Dec. 621 557 of this title or otherwise...

...law, (E) unsupported by substantial evidence in a case subject to sections 556 and 557 of this title or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute. The "narrow" scope of review under the arbitrary and capricious standard (just quoted (5 USC § 706(2)(A))...

...of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, powor, privilege, or immunity ; (3) in excess of statutory...(5) unsupported by substantial evidence * * *. In making the foregoing determinations the court shall review the whole record or such portions thereof...

...be (1) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law * * *; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; * * *." The jurisdiction of the federal courts to enjoin acts of a federal administrative agency in...

...capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional ion Finance Corporation, Defense Plant Corporation, and General Services Administration. — (a) 1006 and 1007 of this title or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute...