International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary IssuesAddison-Wesley Longman, 2000 - 559 sider * NEW! Challenges to State Power section. The readings selected clearly reflect the major debate in international relations about the role of the state and whether it is diminishing in the changing international environment. * NEW! In Part IV, many new selections and new sections: States Versus Mobile Capital and New Actors and New Forces in World Politics. * NEW! More than 40% of selections are new to this edition. * Introductions to each section set the intellectual context and survey the major points the articles will make. * This reader selects some of the best current scholars in the field, including policy makers, economists, traditional IR scholars, and some classics. The mixture and presentation of alternative perspectives provides students with challenging material in the language of the field. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-3 av 85
Side 55
... actors are gaining , or so it is said . Neither reason is cogent , as the following discussion shows . States are not and never have been the only international actors . But then structures are defined not by all of the actors that ...
... actors are gaining , or so it is said . Neither reason is cogent , as the following discussion shows . States are not and never have been the only international actors . But then structures are defined not by all of the actors that ...
Side 76
... actors , on the basis of the meanings that the objects have for them . States act differently toward enemies than they do toward friends because enemies are threatening and friends are not . Anarchy and the distribution of power are ...
... actors , on the basis of the meanings that the objects have for them . States act differently toward enemies than they do toward friends because enemies are threatening and friends are not . Anarchy and the distribution of power are ...
Side 383
... actors , Actor A monopolizes decision - making on all issues concerning all people in a given universe . International primacy means a state has more power than other actors and hence primacy is inherently relative . Even if power is ...
... actors , Actor A monopolizes decision - making on all issues concerning all people in a given universe . International primacy means a state has more power than other actors and hence primacy is inherently relative . Even if power is ...
Innhold
J Ann Tickner | 17 |
Rhoda E Howard and Jack Donnelly | 30 |
PERSPECTIVES ON THE NATURE OF ANARCHY | 49 |
Opphavsrett | |
35 andre deler vises ikke
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
achieve action actors alliances allies American anarchy argue attack balance bandwagoning become behavior capabilities capital century Cold War competition concept conflict cooperation corporations costs decisions defense defined deterrence developing countries diplomacy domestic dominant effects Europe European example exports firms foreign policy fungibility gains Germany global goals hegemony human rights important increase individual industrial institutions interdependence international law international politics international regimes international relations investment issues Japan Japanese labor less liberal major means ment mercantilists military force military power moral multinational multinational corporation mutual nation-state national interest nature nomic norms nuclear weapons offensive organizations peace percent primacy principles problems production realist regional relative Robert Robert Gilpin Robert Jervis role security dilemma social society Soviet Union strategies structure ternational theory Third World threat tion tional trade United Nations University Press violence wars wealth world economy world politics World War II York
Referanser til denne boken
US Foreign Policy After the Cold War: Global Hegemon Or Reluctant Sheriff? Fraser Cameron Ingen forhåndsvisning tilgjengelig - 2005 |