Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court: The Supreme Court in American SocietyKermit L. Hall Routledge, 22. juli 2014 - 502 sider Available as a single volume or as part of the 10 volume set Supreme Court in American Society |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 50
Side 9
... argued that the New York law and the Washington D.C. statute were " vitally dissimilar . " The Wash- ington law ordered that wages had to be high enough to maintain a decent standard of living ; the New York law provided that wages must ...
... argued that the New York law and the Washington D.C. statute were " vitally dissimilar . " The Wash- ington law ordered that wages had to be high enough to maintain a decent standard of living ; the New York law provided that wages must ...
Side 10
... argued that the police power of the state did not include the power to fix the price of labor . In his oral argument , the attorney praised freedom of contract as " one of the inalienable rights with which man was endowed by his Creator ...
... argued that the police power of the state did not include the power to fix the price of labor . In his oral argument , the attorney praised freedom of contract as " one of the inalienable rights with which man was endowed by his Creator ...
Side 14
... argued that the statute was a " valid exercise of police power of the state , " based on Nebbia v . New York and other Supreme Court de- cisions.60 When the Supreme Court reconvened in October , one of its first tasks was to consider ...
... argued that the statute was a " valid exercise of police power of the state , " based on Nebbia v . New York and other Supreme Court de- cisions.60 When the Supreme Court reconvened in October , one of its first tasks was to consider ...
Side 15
... explaining the judges ' action . The New York Times , Nov. 8 , 1936 ; ibid .; Nov. 24 , 1936. The cases had been argued on Nov. 11 and 12 . Still , no one - least of all the President 15 JUSTICE ROBERTS AND THE MINIMUM - WAGE CASES 57.
... explaining the judges ' action . The New York Times , Nov. 8 , 1936 ; ibid .; Nov. 24 , 1936. The cases had been argued on Nov. 11 and 12 . Still , no one - least of all the President 15 JUSTICE ROBERTS AND THE MINIMUM - WAGE CASES 57.
Side 28
... Stettler v . O'Hara , 243 U.S. 629 ( 1917 ) was first argued before the Court . See also , Pusey , Hughes , I , 312-3 . 113 Hendel , op . cit . , 130 , further in the Court's 1936-37 session ; he abandoned his 28 70 LABOR HISTORY.
... Stettler v . O'Hara , 243 U.S. 629 ( 1917 ) was first argued before the Court . See also , Pusey , Hughes , I , 312-3 . 113 Hendel , op . cit . , 130 , further in the Court's 1936-37 session ; he abandoned his 28 70 LABOR HISTORY.
Innhold
32 | |
Judicial Review and Democracy | 57 |
John Marshalls Jeffersonian Concept of Judicial Review | 89 |
Judicial Review of the Devices of Democracy | 240 |
A Critical Guide to Marbury v Madison | 331 |
Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional | 379 |
Deference to Political Decisionmakers | 414 |
Acknowledgments | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court: The Supreme Court ... Kermit L. Hall Begrenset visning - 2014 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
abortion accepted action agency amendment American applied argued argument authority Bill branches Brandeis choice claim clause concept Congress considered constitutional constitutional law constitutionality contract course criticism debate decide decision democracy democratic determine discussion dissenting due process economic effect enforcement equal established executive exercise fact federal freedom function fundamental law groups important individual interest Internal Revenue Code interpretation Invalidate involved issue judges judgment judicial review judiciary jurisdiction Justice Labor legislative legislature less liberty limited Madison majority Marbury Marshall Marshall's meaning nature opinion ordinary law original period political position practice principle procedure protection provisions question reason regulation respect result Roberts rule Security social standard Stat statute substantive suggested supra note Supreme Court theory tion unconstitutional United values violation vote York