Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court: The Supreme Court in American SocietyKermit L. Hall Routledge, 22. juli 2014 - 502 sider Available as a single volume or as part of the 10 volume set Supreme Court in American Society |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 76
Side
... deciding cases . During its history , moreover , the story of the Court has been more than the sum of either the cases it has decided or the justices that have decided them . Its story has been that of the country as a whole , in war ...
... deciding cases . During its history , moreover , the story of the Court has been more than the sum of either the cases it has decided or the justices that have decided them . Its story has been that of the country as a whole , in war ...
Side
... decide whether actions taken by the two other branches of the federal government comply with the word and spirit of the Constitution . The Supreme Court , for example , ordered President Richard M. Nixon to turn over tape recordings of ...
... decide whether actions taken by the two other branches of the federal government comply with the word and spirit of the Constitution . The Supreme Court , for example , ordered President Richard M. Nixon to turn over tape recordings of ...
Side
... decide finally , whether positively or negatively , that makes the practice of judicial review so central to the American scheme of government . Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court VOLUME INTRODUCTION.
... decide finally , whether positively or negatively , that makes the practice of judicial review so central to the American scheme of government . Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court VOLUME INTRODUCTION.
Side 21
... decide the fate of Minimum - Wage legisla- tion . But , thank God he thought it was politically expedient to be with us ! " ' 95 90 13 , 1937 ; he credited it to Edward Roddan . Confidential transcript of Press Con- ference No. 360 ...
... decide the fate of Minimum - Wage legisla- tion . But , thank God he thought it was politically expedient to be with us ! " ' 95 90 13 , 1937 ; he credited it to Edward Roddan . Confidential transcript of Press Con- ference No. 360 ...
Side 24
... decide for itself whether it wanted to reconsider Adkins . The challenge to Adkins was there and could be taken up ( Stone seized upon it ) , or it could be disregarded and the minimum wage could be upheld by distinguishing Adkins . The ...
... decide for itself whether it wanted to reconsider Adkins . The challenge to Adkins was there and could be taken up ( Stone seized upon it ) , or it could be disregarded and the minimum wage could be upheld by distinguishing Adkins . The ...
Innhold
32 | |
Judicial Review and Democracy | 57 |
John Marshalls Jeffersonian Concept of Judicial Review | 89 |
Judicial Review of the Devices of Democracy | 240 |
A Critical Guide to Marbury v Madison | 331 |
Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional | 379 |
Deference to Political Decisionmakers | 414 |
Acknowledgments | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court: The Supreme Court ... Kermit L. Hall Begrenset visning - 2014 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
abortion accepted action agency amendment American applied argued argument authority Bill branches Brandeis choice claim clause concept Congress considered constitutional constitutional law constitutionality contract course criticism debate decide decision democracy democratic determine discussion dissenting due process economic effect enforcement equal established executive exercise fact federal freedom function fundamental law groups important individual interest Internal Revenue Code interpretation Invalidate involved issue judges judgment judicial review judiciary jurisdiction Justice Labor legislative legislature less liberty limited Madison majority Marbury Marshall Marshall's meaning nature opinion ordinary law original period political position practice principle procedure protection provisions question reason regulation respect result Roberts rule Security social standard Stat statute substantive suggested supra note Supreme Court theory tion unconstitutional United values violation vote York