The Federal Antitrust Laws with Amendments: List of Cases Instituted by the United States and Citations of Cases Decided Thereunder Or Relating TheretoU.S. Government Printing Office, 1931 - 274 sider |
Innhold
| 139 | |
| 144 | |
| 146 | |
| 151 | |
| 156 | |
| 158 | |
| 161 | |
| 163 | |
| 92 | |
| 93 | |
| 94 | |
| 96 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 114 | |
| 115 | |
| 119 | |
| 120 | |
| 121 | |
| 127 | |
| 131 | |
| 135 | |
| 137 | |
| 138 | |
| 167 | |
| 175 | |
| 181 | |
| 182 | |
| 194 | |
| 201 | |
| 204 | |
| 218 | |
| 222 | |
| 223 | |
| 229 | |
| 230 | |
| 232 | |
| 235 | |
| 237 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
The Federal Antitrust Law, with Amendments: List of Cases Instituted by the ... United States Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1914 |
Federal Antitrust Laws with Amendments: List of Cases Instituted by the ... United States Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1914 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
agreement association charging a combination charging defendants Circuit Court coal combination and conspiracy combining and conspiring commission Company consent decree conspiracy in restraint conspiracy to restrain conspiring to restrain Court of Appeals dealers December 18 decision decree entered decree was entered defendants entered pleas defendants with combining Demurrer dismissed District Court District of Illinois Eastern District enjoining February 11 final decree fines aggregating Indictment returned June individual defendants injunction interstate commerce January 20 jobbers July June 29 Lumber monopolize interstate trade motion Nolle prosequi entered nolo contendere Northern November October October 17 person Peti Petition filed December Petition filed February Petition filed June pleas of guilty remaining defendants restrain and monopolize restrain interstate trade restraint of interstate restraint of trade Secretary September September 25 Sherman Act Sherman Antitrust Act Southern District stockyard Supreme Court thereof tion filed trade and commerce trial trict United unlawful violation York
Populære avsnitt
Side 32 - It shall be the duty of the various district attorneys, under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, to prosecute for the recovery of forfeitures.
Side 5 - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Side 46 - The costs and expenses of such prosecution shall be paid out of the appropriation for the expenses of the courts of the United States.
Side 2 - The several circuit courts of the United States are hereby invested with jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of this act ; and it shall be the duty of the several district attorneys of the United States, in their respective •districts, under the direction of the Attorney-General, to institute proceedings in equity to prevent and restrain such violations.
Side 3 - An act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies...
Side 4 - That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to lease or make a sale or contract for sale of goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities, whether patented or unpatented...
Side 20 - That this right shall not apply to contempts committed in the presence of the court or so near thereto as to interfere directly with the administration of justice...
Side 4 - ... unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
Side 22 - A vacancy in the commission shall not impair the right of the remaining commissioners to exercise all the powers of the commission.
Side 30 - No person shall be excused from attending and testifying or from producing documentary evidence before the commission or in obedience to the subpoena of the commission on the ground or for the reason that the testimony or evidence, documentary or otherwise, required of him may tend to incriminate him or subject him to a penalty or forfeiture.