 ... But this does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court in which the original judgment was given, to pronounce it; or the right of the State itself to exercise authority over the person or the subject-matter.  Atlantic Reporter - Side 4371894Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1894 - 722 sider
...by law or usage within the courts of the state from whence the said records are Bullock v. Bullock. or shall be taken.' What faith and credit, then, is...upon presenting the former, in order that the latter may have a practical illustration in the discussion, and this seems to be justified because the courts... | |
 | Joseph Story - 1833 - 800 sider
...authority over the persons, or the subject matter. The constitution did not mean to confer a new power or jurisdiction ; but simply to regulate the effect of...acknowledged jurisdiction over persons and things within the territory.3 1 By the act of 27th March, 1804, ch. 56, the provisions of the act of 1790 are enlarged,... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1851 - 860 sider
...authority over the person or the subject matter. The constitution did not mean to confer a new power or jurisdiction, but simply to regulate the effect of...acknowledged jurisdiction over persons and things within the territory." In the case of Fowler vs. Parks el al., (3 Mason 280,) the same distinguished jurist, eminently... | |
 | John Codman Hurd - 1862 - 854 sider
...authority over the persons or the subject-matter. The Constitution did not mean to confer a new power or jurisdiction, but simply to regulate the effect of...acknowledged jurisdiction over persons and things withtn the territory." The meaning of the concluding: sentence is not very obvious. It is, however,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 726 sider
...person or the subject-matter. The Constitution did not mean to confer [upon the States] a new power or jurisdiction, but simply to regulate the effect of...acknowledged jurisdiction over persons and things within their territory." In the Commentary on the Conflict of Laws,! substantially the same remarks are repeated,... | |
 | William J. Henry, William Logan Harris - 1879 - 534 sider
...person or the subject matter. The Constitution did not mean to confer [upon the States] a new power or jurisdiction, but simply to regulate the effect of...acknowledged jurisdiction over persons and things ' within their territory." In the Commentary on the Conflict of Laws (Sec. 609), substantially the same remarks... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1886 - 794 sider
...case. Wall. 58.) judgment was given; and qnoted, with approbation, the remark of Justice Story, that ' the Constitution did not mean to confer a new power...regulate the effect of the acknowledged jurisdiction over person and things within the State." "The case of Landes v. Brant [10 How. US 348] has been quoted... | |
 | 1886 - 1076 sider
...over the person or the subject matter. ; The Constitution did not mean to confer (upon | the States) a new power of jurisdiction, but | simply to regulate...acknowledged jurisdiction over persons and things within their territory/ g 1813. «on v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457 (85 US bk. 21, L. ed. 897). "These authorities... | |
 | 1887 - 972 sider
...over the person or the subject-matter. The Constitution did not mean to confer — upon the States — a new power of jurisdiction, but simply to regulate...acknowledged jurisdiction over persons and things within their territory.' § 1313 "'Want of jurisdiction may be shown either as to the subject-matter or the... | |
| |
