 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1893 - 800 sider
...company had nothing to do; but upon this point, in Insurance Co. v. Tweed, 7 Wall. 52, the court say: 'If a new force or power has intervened, of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of misfortune, the other must be considered as too remote.' The new force or power here would... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 sider
...an action must always be the natural and proximate consequences of the wrongful act complained of. If a new force or power has intervened, of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the mischief or injury, the first must be considered as too remote." 174 M1CH.-45. Again... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1869 - 802 sider
...ascertain whether any new cause has intervened between the fact accomplished and the alleged cause. If a new force or power has intervened of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the misfortune, the other must be considered as too remote. In the present case we think... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1870 - 800 sider
...ascertain whether any new cause has intervened between the fact accomplished and the alleged cause. If a new force or power has intervened of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the misfortune, the other must be considered as too remote. In the present case we think... | |
 | 1873 - 462 sider
...ascertain whether any new cause has intervened between the fact accomplished and the alleged cause. If a new force or power has intervened, of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the mischief, the other must be considered too remote. In the present case we think there... | |
 | 1873 - 680 sider
...ascertain whether any new cause has intervened between the fact accomplished and the alleged cause. If a new force or power has intervened, of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the mischief, the other must be considered too remote. In the present case we think there... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 728 sider
...say the cause of A.'s injury is different from B.'s. In Insurance Company v. Tweed, this court says: "If a new force or power has intervened of itself, sufficient to annul as the cause of the misfortune, the other must he considered as too remote." A new force did... | |
 | 1875 - 788 sider
...In the language of Mr. Justice Miller, in the supreme court of the United States, in Insurance Co. v. Tweed, 7 Wallace, 52, " If a new force or power has intervened, of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the misfortune, the other must be considered as too remote." That language was used in... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 808 sider
...ascertain whether any new cause has intervened between the fact accomplished and the alleged cause. If a new force or power has intervened of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the misfortune, the other must be considered as too remote." CAUSATION. If the intermediate... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1879 - 888 sider
...ascertain whether any new cause has intervened between the fact accomplished and the alleged cause. If a new force or power has intervened, of itself sufficient to stand us the cause of the mischief, the other must be considered too remote." In Fentv. Toledo, Peoriaand... | |
| |
One of the most valuable of the criteria furnished us by these authorities, is to ascertain whether any new cause has intervened between the fact accomplished and the alleged cause. If a new force or power has intervened of itself sufficient to stand... 
