...In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut off the States from legislating on all subjects relating to the health,...safety of their citizens, though the legislation might mdirectly affect the commerce of the country. I have quoted only a few cases which have involved fundamental...

...the police power. These rules are: 1. "In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the States off from legislating...might indirectly affect the commerce of the country." Sherlock v. Alling, 93 US 99, 103. 2. "If the purpose of the act cannot otherwise be accomplished —...

...of persons engaged in such commerce. In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the States off from legislating...regulation of it within the meaning of the Constitution. * * * And it may be said generally that the iegislation of a State, not directly against commerce or...

...of persons engaged in such commerce. In conferring upon .Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the States off from legislating...of the country. Legislation, in a great variety of Avays, may affect commerce and persons engaged in it without constituting a regulation of it, within...

...an encroachment upon it; for, as has been often said, " legislation may in a great variety of ways affect commerce and persons engaged in it without...regulation of it within the meaning of the Constitution." Sherlock v. Ailing, 93 US 103; State Tax on Railway Gro»8 Receipts, 15 Wall. 284. Thus, in Munn v....

...deemed an encroachment upon it, for, as has been often said, "legislation may in a great variety of ways affect commerce and persons engaged in it without...regulation of it within the meaning of the Constitution," Sherlock v. Ailing, S3 U. 8. 103; State Tax on Hallway G'rus* Receipt*, 15 Wall. 293. Thus, in Munn...

...case already quoted it was said : '' In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the states off from legislating...regulation of it within the meaning of the Constitution." 68 In another very recent case Mr. Justice Strong said : *9 " Many acts of a state may indeed affect...

...Otto, 275, State Police. But this power conferred on Congress is not intended to prevent the States from legislating on all subjects relating to the health, life and safety of their citizens, although such legislation might indirectly affect the commerce of the country. 1 III. STATE REGULATION...

...in Sherlock v. Ailing, 93 US 99-103: "In conferring upon congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the states off from legislating...though the legislation might indirectly affect the commerceof the country. Legislation, in a great variety of ways, may affect commerce, and persons engaged...

..."In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the States oit" from legislating on all subjects relating to the health,...might indirectly affect the commerce of the country." (95 Otto, p. 100.) lu this case the whole principle is clearly enunciated. And now, sir, in conclusion,...