The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. The Central Law Journal - Side 3411892Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
| 1869 - 972 sider
...master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running-down cases; it has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1907 - 792 sider
...nothing to take it out of the general rule that the master or principal is answerable for every such wrong of his servant or agent, as is committed in the course of his service or for his master's or principal's benefit, or, to speak more accurately, for his master or principal,... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1867 - 468 sider
...master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. (3) That principle is acted upon every day in (1) 7 H. & N. 172; 30 LJ (Ex.) 337. (2) Hern v. Nichols,... | |
| Albert Venn Dicey - 1870 - 582 sider
...master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved ... In all ^the] cases [in which the master has been held liable], it may he said that the master has... | |
| India - 1878 - 710 sider
...master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
| Francis Wharton - 1874 - 960 sider
...master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running-down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
| Herbert Broom - 1874 - 880 sider
...master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master can be proved." Ill Fuller v. Wilson, which was an action on the case for a fraudulent misrepresentation... | |
| Thomas William Saunders - 1874 - 238 sider
...master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the matter be proved : (Laugher v. Pointer, 5 B. & C. 547, at p. 554.) That principle is acted upon every... | |
| Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 830 sider
...master is anewerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher p. Pointer, о Barn. & C. 047, 554. The nature of the action is still... | |
| Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 808 sider
...for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service, and lor the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher v. Pointer, 5 Barn. & C. 547, 554. The nature of the action is still more... | |
| |