Confirmation Hearings on Federal Appointments: Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session, on Confirmation Hearings on Appointments to the Federal Judiciary, Volum 4,Del 1U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992 |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
4th Cir Alabama Albritton alleged Amendment rights Andalusia Appeals assets awards Bank Bar Association bonds California Carlos cause of action Chairman Circuit civil claim clients Code Columbia Committee Copley Press counsel County Covington County criminal damages dates death penalty decision defendant dependent children discrimination District Court District Judge District of South Douglas County employees evidence export filed FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REPORT Fourteenth Amendment Fresno Goldberg grain Haik hearing Herlong income Instructions involved issue judicial judicial activism judiciary jury lawyers liability List litigation Magistrate magistrate's recommendation membership nomination partnership party petitioner petitioner's plaintiff position practice present President quarterback question reason San Diego Senator HEFLIN Senator KOHL Senator SIMON Senator THURMOND South Carolina statement summary judgment Superior Court supra Supreme Court testified testimony Texas tort trial judge Trial Tr U.S. agricultural U.S. Attorney U.S. District U.S. SENATOR United States District Wanger Washington
Populære avsnitt
Side 292 - General that it is not enough for the district judge to find that "the defendant [is] oriented to time and place and [has] some recollection of events," but that the "test must be whether he has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding— and whether he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him.
Side 750 - In a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction, except with respect to Federal taxes, any court of the United States, upon the filing of an appropriate pleading, may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought. Any such declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment or decree and shall be reviewable as such.
Side 527 - Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 US 317 (1986). 22. In our view, the plain language of Rule 56(c) mandates the entry of summary judgment, after adequate time for discovery and upon motion, against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.
Side 340 - Specifically, we hold that a sentence of death cannot be carried out if the jury that imposed or recommended it was chosen by excluding veniremen for cause simply because they voiced general objections to the death penalty or expressed conscientious or religious scruples against its infliction.
Side 339 - The defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.
Side 296 - We now hold that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.
Side 1030 - ... standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A compilation is limited to presenting in the form of financial statements information that is the representation of management. We have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them.