 | Sir James Allan Park - 1787 - 660 sider
...whatever caufe it be owing, if he do not run the rifk, the confideration, for which the premium or money was put into his hands, fails, and therefore he ought to return it. Another rule is, that if the rifk has once commenced, there fhall be no apportionment or return of premium afterwards. For though... | |
 | Sir James Allan Park - 1799 - 664 sider
...run the rifk, the eonfideration, for which the premium or money was put into his hands', fails, .irtf therefore he ought to return it. Another rule is, that if the rift: has once commenced, there fhall be no apportionment or Return of premium afterwards. For though... | |
 | James Allan Park - 1800 - 690 sider
...caufe it be owing, if he do not run the rifk, the conftderation, for which the premium or money w» put into his hands, fails, and therefore, he ought to return it. Another rule is, that if the rifk has once commenced, there fhall be no apportionment or return of premium afterwards. 5 For For... | |
 | Samuel Comyn - 1807 - 646 sider
...rifle of indemnifying the infured, and to whatever caufe it be owing, if he rfoes not run the ri(k, the confideration, for which the premium was put into...he ought to return it. Another rule is, that if the rilk has once commenced, there (hall be no apportionment or return of premium afterwards. For though... | |
 | James Allan Park - 1809 - 924 sider
...whatever caufe it be owing, if he do not run the riik, the confideration, for which the premium or money was put into his hands, fails, and therefore he ought to return it. Another rule is, that if the riik has once commenced, there fhall be no apportionment or return of premium afterwards. For though... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1812 - 732 sider
...whatever cause it be owing, if he does not run the risk, the consideration for which the premium or money was put into his hands, fails, and therefore he ought to return it." Per Lord Mansfield CJin Tyrie v. Fletcher, Cowp. 668. (59) Upon an insurance at and from a place, if... | |
 | GEORGE MAULE AND WILLIAM SELWYN - 1817 - 640 sider
...indemnifying the assured,' and whatever cause it be owing to, if he does not run the risk, the consideration for which the premium was put into his hands fails, and therefore he ought to return it." Also, in Neville v. Wilkinson (6), the Lord Chancellor considered the rule as clear, that in all cases... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1817 - 634 sider
...indemnifying the assured, and whatever cause it be owing to, if he does not run the risk, the consideration for which the premium was put into his hands fails, and therefore he ought to return it." Also, in Neville v. IVilkiiuon (6), the Lcrd Chancellor considered the rule as clear, that . in all... | |
 | Patrick Brady Leigh - 1838 - 774 sider
...whatever cause it be owing, if he does not run the risk, the consideration, for which the premium or money was put into his hands, fails and therefore he ought to return it. Another rule is, that if that risk of the contract of indemnity has once commenced, there shall be no apportionment or return... | |
 | Archibald John Stephens - 1842 - 998 sider
...cause it be owing to, if he does not run the risk, the consideration, for which the premium or money was put into his hands, fails, and therefore he ought to return it. 2. Another rule is, that if that risk of the contract of indemnity has once commenced, there shall... | |
| |
... other cause, the premium shall be returned, because a policy of insurance is a contract of indemnity. The underwriter receives a premium for running the risk of indemnifying the... 
