Nomination of Earl J. Silbert to be United States Attorney: Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, Second Session on Nomination of Earl J. Silbert, of the District of Columbia, to be United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, Del 1U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974 - 298 sider |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
Alch alleged appear arrest asked Assistant U.S. Attorney Baldwin believe Bittman blackmail break-in bugging burglary called campaign client Colson Committee to Reelect conspiracy contents conversations counsel crime criminal defendants Democratic National Committee Department of Justice disclosure District of Columbia documents Ehrlichman evidence fact Federal filed Glanzer going Gordon Liddy grand jury Gray Haldeman hearing Henry Petersen Howard Hunt Hunt and Liddy immunity indictment interview investigation involved January Jeb Magruder John Dean John Mitchell Judge Sirica June 17 Justice Department Kalmbach Kleindienst knew lawyer Liddy's Magruder Mardian matter Maurice Stans McCord Morgan Report motive Nixon perjury person political prosecution question Re-Elect Reelect the President Reply response Segretti Senator BAYH Senator ERVIN Senator HART Senator TUNNEY Silbert Sloan Special Prosecutor statement talk telephone testified testimony tion told U.S. Attorney United States Attorney Washington White House wiretapping witnesses
Populære avsnitt
Side 6 - The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.
Side 213 - Whenever any wire or oral communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of such communication and no evidence derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof if the disclosure of that information would be in violation of this chapter.
Side 230 - It is a grand inquest, a body with powers of investigation and inquisition, the scope of whose inquiries is not to be limited narrowly by questions of propriety or forecasts of the probable result of the investigation, or by doubts whether any particular individual will be found properly subject to an accusation of crime.
Side 222 - Cir. 1954), the court summarized the reasons for grand jury secrecy as follows: (1) To prevent the escape of those whose indictment may be contemplated; (2) to insure the utmost freedom to the grand jury in its deliberations, and to prevent persons subject to indictment or their friends from importuning the grand jurors; (3) to prevent subornation of perjury or tampering with the witnesses who may testify before grand jury and later appear at the trial of those indicted by it...
Side 89 - If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense against the United States, and one or more parties do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, all the parties to such conspiracy shall be liable to a penalty of not more than $10,000, or to imprisonment for not more than two years, or to both fine and imprisonment, in the discretion of the court.
Side 89 - ... (iv) such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial...
Side 19 - EC 5-21 The obligation of a lawyer to exercise professional judgment solely on behalf of his client requires that he disregard the desires of others that might impair his free judgment.
Side 74 - Until now the only testimonial privilege for unofficial witnesses that is rooted in the Federal Constitution is the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination. We are asked to create another by interpreting the First Amendment to grant newsmen a testimonial privilege that other citizens do not enjoy.
Side 39 - ... contents", when used with respect to any wire or oral communication, includes any information concerning the identity of the parties to such communication or the existence, substance, purport, or meaning of that communication; (9) "Judge of competent jurisdiction...
Side 76 - States; (c) intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know...