BOROUGH OF EDGEWOOD, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILKINSBURG & EAST PITTSBURGH STREET RAILWAY COMPANY et al. [No. 152]; and BOROUGH OF EDGEWOOD, Plaintiff in Error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA [605] et al. [No. 266.] Error to state court-Federal question. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. See same case below, No. 152, 268 Pa. 201, 110 Atl. 926; No. 266, 269 Pa. 342, 113 Atl. 79. Messrs. M. W. Acheson, Jr., and Charles A. Jones for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Edwin W. Smith, Frank M. Hunter, and John Fox Weiss for defendants in error. March 13, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178, 52 L. ed. 151, 159, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 40; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co. 250 U. S. 394, 63 L. ed. 1054, P.U.R.1919E, 178, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 526; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission, 250 U. S. 652, 63 L. ed. 1190, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 54; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission, point (3), 255 U. S. 562, 65 L. ed. 787, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 323; Michigan ex rel. Groesbeck v. Detroit United R. Co. 257 U. S. 609, ante, 395, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 46, decided October 10, 1921; Chicago v. Chicago R. Co. 257 U. S. 617, ante, 399, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 95, decided November 21, 1921; Avon Twp. v. Detroit United R. Co. 257 U. S. 618, ante, 400, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 168, decided December 12, 1921. WINEHILL & ROSENTHAL, Plaintiffs in Error, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA. [No. 163.] Error to state court-frivolous Federal question. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. See same case below, 147 La. 781, 86 So. 181. Mr. Gustave Lemle for plaintiffs in error. Mr. H. Garland Dupre for defendant in error. March 13, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O'Brien (O'Callaghan v. O'Brien), 199 U. S. 89, 100, 50 L. ed. 101, 107, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 727; LEON MOREL, Appellant, v. PERCY A. BAKER, as Superintendent of Immigra tion Station. [No. 299.] Appeal-from circuit court of appealshabeas corpus case. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 270 Fed. 577. Mr. Emil Adamson for appellant. Solicitor General Beck and Mr. Harry S. Ridgely for appellee. March 20, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58, 36 L. ed. 340, 344, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 517; Horn v. Mitchell, 243 U. S. 247, 249, 61 L. ed. 700, 701, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 293. CARLOS C. CORBETT, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. [No. 746.] Error to state court-Federal question. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina. S. C., 20 See same case below, A.L.R. 328, 109 S. E. 133. Messrs. Cole L. Blease and W. C. Wolfe for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Charles A. Douglas and H. H. Obear for defendant in error. March 20, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175, 49 L. ed. 1000, 1002, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 654; Louisiana Nav. Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, 101, 57 L. ed. 138, 140, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 78; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419, 59 L. ed. 1027, 1029, 1030, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 625; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19, 62 L. ed. 123, 124, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 7. (2) Section 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. Supp. 1918, p. 411), § 2; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6, 64 L. ed. 421, 423, 424, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255. [607] J. N. MCBRIDE, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE OF IDAHO. [No. 168.] Error to state court-frivolous Federal question. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho. See same case below, 33 Idaho, 124, 190 Pac. 247. Mr. Patrick H. Loughran for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Roy L. Black and Albert H. Connor for defendant in error. March 20, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of V. (1) Equitable Life Assur. Soc. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314, 47 L. ed. 190, 193, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 123; Consolidated Turnp. Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co. 228 U. S. 596, 600, 57 L. ed. 982, 983, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 609; Pennsylvania Hospital v. Philadelphia, 245 U. S. 20, 24, 62 L. ed. 124, 128, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 35. (2) Crane v. Campbell, 245 U. S. 304, 62 L. ed. 304, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 98. G. D. COLLINS et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. J. J. BYRNES, Sheriff, etc. [No. 499.] Error to state court-Federal question. In Error to the Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco, State of California. Messrs. George D. Collins and Maxwell McNutt for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John W. Preston for defendant in error. March 27, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. 2d ed. p. 411), § 2; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6, 64 L. ed. 423, 424, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255. D. A. WILLIAMS et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. JOHN K. SCUDDER et al. [No. 352.] Error to state court-frivolous Federal question. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. See same case below, 102 Ohio St. 305, 131 N. E. 481. Mr. Smith W. Bennett for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. John G. Price and Ray Martin for defendants in error. March 27, 1922. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Farrell v. O'Brien (O'Callaghan v. O'Brien) 199 U. S. 89, 100, 50 L. ed. 101, 107, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 727; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co. 237 U. S. 580, 583, 59 L. ed. 1127, 1128, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195, 64 L. ed. 855, 857, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 453. (2) Gaar, S. & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470, 56 L. ed. 510, 512, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 236; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. [608] Northern Realty Co. 244 U. S. 300, 303, 61 L. ed. 1153, 1157, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 643; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257, 62 L. ed. 701, 702, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 264; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271, 63 L. ed. 233, 235, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 111. JIM DENSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE | [609] EVELYN P. FERRY, Appellant, v. See same case below, 150 Ga. 618, 104 S. E. 780. Mr. John Randolph Cooper for plaintiff in error. Messrs. George M. Napier and R. A. Denny for defendant in error. March 27, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. 2d ed. p. 411), § 2; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6, 64 L. ed. 423, 424, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255. CITY OF SAPULPA et al., Plaintiffs in Er- See same case below, 79 Okla. 196, 192 Mr. James F. Lawrence for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. C. B. Ames, Russell G. Lowe and D. A. Richardson for defendant in error. HENRY L. CORBETT et al. [No. 250.] Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to review a decree which affirmed a decree of the District Court for the District of Oregon, in favor of defendants in a suit to establish a dower right. Affirmed. Mr. Charles Haldane for appellant. Mr. Joseph Simon for appellee. April 10, 1922. Per Curiam: Decree affirmed with costs, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon, per stipulation of counsel that this case abide the decision in case No. 177. Cement Co. Mr. J. A. Howell for the Utah-Idaho Central Railroad Co. Messrs. John T. MacLane, C. C. Parsons, and Harvey H. Cluff for defendant in error. March 27, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178, 52 L. ed. 151, 159, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 40; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co. 250 U. S. 394, 63 L. ed. 1054, P.U.R. April 10, 1922. Per Curiam: Af1919E, 178, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 526; Kan-firmed upon the authority of Union Dry sas City v. Public Service Commission, Goods Co. v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Corp. 250 U. S. 652, 63 L. ed. 1190, 40 Sup. 311, 9 A.L.R. 1420, P.U.R.1919C, 60, 39 248 U. S. 372, 375, 376, 63 L. ed. 309, Ct. Rep. 54; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission, 255 U. S. 562, 65 L. ed. 787, Co. v. Railroad Commission, 251 U. S. Sup. Ct. Rep. 117; Producers Transp. 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 323; Michigan ex rel. 228, 232, 64 L. ed. 239, 242, P.U.R.1920C, Groesbeck v. Detroit United R. Co. 257 574, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 131. U. S. 609, ante, 395, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 46, decided October 10, 1921; Chicago v. Chicago R. Co. 257 U. S. 617, ante, 399, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 95, decided November, 21, 1921; Avon Twp. v. Detroit United R. Co. 257 U. S. 618, ante, 400, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 168, decided December 12, 1921; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & E. P. Street R. Co. 258 U. S. 604, ante, 786, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 313, decided March 13, 1922. 1 JULIA LAMERE MICKADIET et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. ALBERT B. FALL,1 Secretary of the Interior. [No. 198.] 1 Albert B. Fall, present Secretary of the substituted March 24, 1922, as the party deInterior, as successor to John Barton Payne, fendant in error herein, on motion of Mr. Edward F. Colladay in that behalf. Mandamus-to Secretary of the Interior, GEORGE H. ENGELHARD, Receiver, etc., -controlling administrative action. In Error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. See same case below, 5 App. D. C. 115, 269 Fed. 194. Messrs. E. F. Colladay, P. H. Marshall, H. S. Barger, Howard Saxton, and B. B. Pettus for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. C. Edward Wright, Charles J. Kappler, and Blackburn Esterline for defendant in error. April 10, 1922. Per Curiam: Affirmed upon the authority of Lane v. United States, 241 U. S. 201, 60 L. ed. 956, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 599. Appellant, v. GEORGE J. SCHROEDER et al. [No. 816.] Constitutional law-full faith and credit. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. See same case below, 278 Fed. 341. Messrs. Gustavus A. Rogers and Almet F. Jenks for appellant. Mr. Harry Lane for appellees. April 17, 1922. Per Curiam: Decree affirmed with costs; and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. JOE ALI, Appellant, v. DAVID LEHRHAUPT, Immigration Inspector, etc. [No. 62.] Appeal-from district court-frivolous Federal question. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. Mr. Hannis Taylor for appellant. Solicitor General Beck for appellee. April 24, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216-218, 59 L. ed. 544-548, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 285; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 185, 63 L. ed. 550, 551, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 191. See Samad v. Behrandt, 257 U. S. 613, ante, 397, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 91. VIRGINIA BAILEY et al., Plaintiffs in, HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ApError, v. OREGON-WASHINGTON RAILroad & NAVIGATION COMPANY. [No. 239.] Error to state court-Federal question. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon. See same case below, 97 Or. 471, 191 Pac. 782. Messrs. Thomas Mannix and George A. Brown for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. W. H. Clark, A. C. Spencer, and John F. Reilly for defendant in er ror. April 24, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. Supp. 1918, p. 411), § 2; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6, 64 L. ed. 421, 423, 424, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255. pellant, v. GARLAND S. JOHNSON, Administrator of the Estate of Nannie M. Johnson, Deceased. [No. 232.] Appeal-from district court-frivolous Federal question. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. Messrs. James C. Jones, Lon O. Hocker, Frank H. Sullivan, George F. Haid, and James C. Jones, Jr., for appellant. Mr. Matthew A. Fyke for appellee. May 1, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O'Brien (O'Callaghan v. O'Brien) 199 U. S. 89, 100, 50 L. ed. 101, 107, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 727; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co. 237 U. S. 580, 583, 59 L. ed. 1127, 1128, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195, 64 L. ed. 855, 857, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 453. [612] JOHN DOE, Demise of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER [No. Origi nal]; and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff, v. EUGENE VAN VOORHIS et al., Commissioners of Appraisal. [No., Original.] Motions for leave to file declarations herein. Messrs. J. Weston Allen and J. R. Benton for plaintiff. April 24, 1922. Denied without prejudice to filing of motions for leave to file bills in equity for the same purpose. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. ROBERT A. WIDENMANN, Plaintiff in Error, v. CHARLES E. HUGHES, as Secretary of State, etc. [No. 92.] Motion requesting the court to deliver an opinion in this case. See same case below, 49 App. D. C. 358, 265 Fed. 998. Messrs. Geo. W. Tucker and Everett V. Abbot for plaintiff in error. May 1, 1922. Denied. EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF CARL PARKER, Petitioner. [No., Original.] Motion for leave to file petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus herein. Mr. Walter Holland for petitioner. May 1, 1922. Denied. [613] JOHN BARTON PAYNE, Agent, etc., et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. INDUSTRIAL BOARD OF ILLINOIS et al. [No. 222.1 Abatement-suit against public officersubstitution. In Error to the Circuit Court of Coles County, State of Illinois. Vance, Jr., for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Michael M. Doyle and Edward J. Brundage for defendants in error. May 1, 1922. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Act of February 8, 1899 (30 Stat. at L. 822, chap. 121, Comp. Stat. § 1594, 8 Fed. Stat. Anno. 2d ed. p. 953); LeCrone v. MeAdoo, 253 U. S. 217, 219, 64 L. ed. 869, 870, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 510. KEOKUK & HAMILTON BRIDGE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. JOHN H. MCCALLISTER, County Treasurer, etc. [No. 228.] Error to state court-Federal question. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. See same case below, 295 Ill. 176, 129 N. E. 87. Messrs. Felix T. Hughes and D. E. Mack for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Edward J. Brundage, Lee Siebenborn, and Clifton J. O'Hara for defendant in error. |