that they perfectly correspond with the account given of them by lord Castlereagh in his speech of 1810, with a full extract of which we have presented our readers.

"Much has been said elsewhere," (said lord Grenville), "of the influence of their bishops; and, " in a former debate, even in this house, great stress "was laid on the dangers of a catholic hierarchy. "If

If you tolerate the catholic church, which is epis"copal, you must of course allow it to have its

bishops. But, it is unquestionably proper, that "the crown should exercise an effectual negative "over the appointment of the persons, called to "those functions. To this, the catholics of Ire"land declare themselves perfectly willing to ac"cede. The precise mode of giving effect to the principle, will best be settled by the wisdom of parliament. It is fit matter for discussion in such "a committee as I propose. The declaration of "the catholics on this subject is an unquestionable

proof of their solicitude to meet the kindness of "their fellow-subjects, and to accede to any prac"tical means of removing even the most ground"less jealousies. As such, I rejoice that it has been "made, and I see with infinite satisfaction the just

impression which it has universally produced. "To me it is not new. I always felt the propriety "of providing for this point. The experience of "other countries proved both its expediency and "its practicability. It formed a part of the plans "intended to be brought forward at the period of "the Union; and what we then knew of the senti

"ments of the catholics, respecting it, left no doubt

upon our minds that the matter might be easily "and satisfactorily adjusted. Provision was also "intended to be made for the decent and necessary "subsistence of the catholic clergy of that country. "More than that they did not ask; and even that they were unwilling to receive in any manner "that might tend to separate their cause from that "of their community*."

It may not be improper in this place to subjoin, what lord Grenville said in this speech, on the nature of the spiritual supremacy of the king of England in spiritual concerns. "We are often told," (his lordship said), "that catholics refuse to acknow"ledge the same obedience to their sovereign,

"Sir,

*The writer was in the house of lords when lord Grenville made this speech, and till that time had not heard of the veto. Having soon afterwards occasion to write to lord Grenville on other business, he took the liberty to inquire from his lordship, on what authority he had made the declaration, which has just been copied. His lordship replied by a letter, now in the custody of the writer: it contains the following passage; which, with his lordship's permission, he presents to his readers. "Camd. House, Feb. 4, 1809. "What I said in the house of lords on this matter, as con"nected with Ireland, I spoke from a paper in Dr. Milner's "hand-writing, which is still in my possession, and to the "words of which I carefully adhered. Dr. Milner, who heard "me, came to me the next day for the express purpose, as he "said, of expressing to me his satisfaction in what I had said; "and in a printed paper, dated, I believe, on that or the fol "lowing day, which he drew up for private circulation, he expresses the same sentiment as to my speech on this point. “I am, dear sir, most truly yours,

66

"Grenville."

"which he receives from all his other subjects. "The charge is wholly groundless. They recog"nise, as you do, in the civil government of their country, all temporal power and authority. Their "uniform and repeated declarations, the pledges

66

they have already given, the oaths they have " already taken, ought to satisfy you fully on this "head. If more security be necessary, let it be "exacted; but let your measure apply only to that, "for which it professes to provide,—the authority

66

66

of your sovereign and the security of your govern"ment. The oath, as it now stands, includes a question of spiritual supremacy, foreign to those objects. The church of England itself does not "acknowledge any such supremacy in the crown. "The king, acting by the councils, and exercising "the powers which the laws have given him, is in"deed in all matters, ecclesiastical or temporal, supreme. But he is so as a civil magistrate only. "He is not the spiritual head; he is not, if I may

66

66

so express it, the pope of the church of England. "Such a claim was indeed once maintained by the "capricious despotism of a prince, whose wildest imagination it was not always safe to resist. But "the wise and virtuous men who laid, after his de66 cease, the true foundations of our church, admitted "no such authority in their sovereign. It exists "not, therefore, in the church of England. Of the “other established church of this united kingdom, the king is not, in any sense whatever, acknowledged as the head. The same temporal obe"dience, which both these protestant churches

66

pay

"to their sovereigns, the catholics acknowledge "also. In all matters of civil government, even of "that mixed nature in which ecclesiastical and "civil jurisdictions are combined, they submit "themselves, without reserve, to the supreme authority of the king, in his parliament, as legisla"tor;-in other councils, as civil governor of this empire. In the spiritual head of their church,

they acknowledge, as all the subjects of this realm "formerly acknowleged, a spiritual authority con"fined to questions of faith. The Reformation has

taught us, that for that spiritual authority there "is no warrant in the principles of our religion. "But this is a question purely of religious belief; "in no degree affecting that absolute duty and "undivided allegiance, which our catholic fellow

subjects, in common with ourselves, owe and pay "to the person and government of their sovereign. "In a committee, you may place this matter in its "true light, and bring it to the unerring test of "experience. With that view, it was intended, at "the period to which I have so often referred, to "submit to parliament, in lieu of the oath of supre

macy, framed, as we all know, for the purpose of "exclusion, a new form of oath, calculated to unite, "not to divide, our people. That oath would have "contained an explicit pledge of support to the "established constitution, and the most express dis"claimer that could be devised, of any interference "with his majesty's legitimate and undoubted sove

reignty. Whatever words may be most effectual "for this purpose, let them be adopted: provide

"the fullest security, that jealousy itself can dictate, for that which we are all equally anxious to de"fend; and let it then be seen, whether the catho"lics in Ireland are reluctant to concur in such "declarations."

LXXXVI. 9.

Continued adherence of the Irish Prelates, to their Resolution in 1799, until their meeting in September 1808.

THE effect produced in favour of the catholic cause, by what was said in both houses of parliament of the willingness of the catholic prelates of Ireland to accede to the veto, was very great: even their most determined adversaries seemed to consider that it had gained them their cause. This was the general language within the walls of parliament: the first expression, which any catholic heard, from his protestant acquaintance, on the following day, was a congratulation on the turn of the debate, and the event which occasioned it.

The Irish prelates distinctly expressed to many, their approbation of what had been said on the veto, by their parliamentary advocates; and a considerable time elapsed before the slightest murmur against it was heard.

L

"The debate in the house of commons," says sir John Hippisley*, "took place on the 25th May 1808; and in a few days the report of it "reached Dublin. Those parliamentary friends, "who had been advocates of the measure, received "deliberate acknowledgments of their efforts, and

* Substance of his speech in the debate in 1808.