 | 1918 - 734 sider
...prevailing opinion, read by Justice Day, holds that the statute is " an invasion by the Federal power for the control of a matter purely local in its character, and over which no authority lias been delegated to Congress ;" and argues that if Congress has the power which it assumed to exercise... | |
 | 1918 - 732 sider
...prevailing opinion, read by Justice Day, holds that the statute is " an invasion by the Federal power for the control of a matter purely local in its character,...which no authority has been delegated to Congress ;" and argues that if Congress has the power which it assumed to exercise in this statute " all freedom... | |
 | Oklahoma Corporation Commission - 1919 - 644 sider
...Ed. 648, 662 ; Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 30, 63, 21 L. Ed. 394. 404; Kldd v. Pearson, supra. To sustain this statute would not be. in our judgment,...which no authority has been delegated to Congress in conferring the power to regualte commerce among the states. "We have neither authority nor disposition... | |
 | 1917 - 848 sider
...to the power over local affairs reserved to the states. "To sustain this statute," says the majority "would not be in our judgment a recognition of the...control of a matter purely local in its character." Compare with this the statement of the effect of the act and the relation of the federal and state... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1918 - 628 sider
...New York v. Miln, 11 Pet. 102, 139; Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 63; Kidd v. Pearson, supra. To sustain this statute would not be in our judgment...which no authority has been delegated to Congress in conferring the power to regulate commerce among the States. We have neither authority nor disposition... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1918 - 618 sider
...New York v. MUn, 11 Pet. 102, 139; Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 63; Kidd v. Pearson, supra. To sustain this statute would not be in our judgment...which no authority has been delegated to Congress in conferring the power to regulate commerce among the States. We have neither authority nor disposition... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1918 - 624 sider
...New York v.'Miln, 11 Pet. 102, 139; Slaughter Hvuse Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 63; Kidd v. Pearson, supra. To sustain this statute would not be in our judgment...authority over interstate commerce, but would sanction an^invasion by the federal power of the control of a matter purely local in its character, and over... | |
 | Oklahoma Corporation Commission - 1919 - 644 sider
...L. Ed. 648, 662; Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36. 63, 21 L. Ed. 394. 404; Kidd v. Pearson, supra. To sustain this statute would not be, in our judgment,...which no authority has been delegated to Congress in conferring the power to regualte commerce among the states. "We have neither authority nor disposition... | |
 | 1919 - 1030 sider
...forgotten that the nation is made up of states to which are entrusted the powers of local government. ... To sustain this statute would not be in our judgment...which no authority has been delegated to Congress in conferring the power to regulate commerce among the states. . . . " In our view the necessary effect... | |
 | 1919 - 1804 sider
...L. ed. 648, 662; Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 63, 21 L. ed. 394, 404; Kidd v. Pearson, supra. To sustain this statute would not be, in our judgment,...which no authority has been delegated to Congress in conferring the power to regulate commerce among the states. We have neither authority nor disposition... | |
| |
To sustain this statute would not be, in our judgment, a recognition of the lawful exertion of congressional authority over interstate commerce, but would sanction an invasion by the Federal power of the control of a matter purely local in its character... 
