 There is no privity of contract between these parties; and if the plaintiff can sue, every passenger, or even any person passing along the road, who was injured by the upsetting of the coach, might bring a similar action. Unless we confine the operation...  Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of ... - Side 356av Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1884Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1843 - 842 sider
...passing along the road, who was injured by the upsetting of the coach, might bring a similar action. Unless we confine the operation of such contracts...consequences, to which I can see no limit, would ensue. Where a party becomes responsible to the public, by undertaking a public duty, he is liable, though... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1843 - 852 sider
...passing along the road, who was injured by the upsetting of the coach, might bring a similar action. {Unless we confine the operation of such contracts...most absurd and outrageous consequences, to which J can see no limit, would ensue, [Where a party becomes responsible to the public, by undertaking a... | |
 | 1865 - 934 sider
...passing along the road who was injured by the upsetting of the coach, might bring a similar action. Unless we confine the operation of such contracts...outrageous consequences, to which I can see no limit, would (21) 2 Mee. ic W. 519; s. с. 6 Law J. Rep. (NB) Eich. 137 : and in error, 4 Mee. & W. 837; я. с.... | |
 | 1897 - 1116 sider
...court denied a recovery upon the ground that the coach maker owed plaintiff no duty. Lord Abinger, in the course of his opinion, said: ''Unless we confine...contracts as this to » the parties who entered into it, the most absurd and outrageous consequences, to whichI can see no limit, would ensue." So a dec-;*... | |
 | 1881 - 496 sider
...by the court that the action would not lie, as there was no privity of contract between the parties. Unless we confine the operation of such contracts as this to the parties who entered into them, said Lord ABINOEB, the most absurd consequences, to which no limit can be seen, will ensue; and Baron... | |
 | 1884 - 762 sider
...whole court, that the action would not lie, as there is no privity of contract between the parties. Unless we confine the operation of such contracts as this to the parties who entered into them, said Lord Abinger, the most absurd consequences, to which no limit can be seen, will ensue; and Baron... | |
 | Francis Taylor Piggott - 1885 - 448 sider
...and C. being injured, it was held that he could not sue the defendant. " Unless," said the Court, " we confine the operation of such contracts as this...most absurd and outrageous consequences, to which there could be no limit, would ensue. . . . The only safe rule is to confine the right to recover to... | |
 | Floyd Russell Mechem - 1890 - 904 sider
...the court denied a recovery upon the ground that the coachmaker owed plaintiff no duty: Lord ABINOKK, in the course of his opinion, said : ' Unless we confine...operation of such contracts as this to the parties whc entered into them, the most absurd and outrageous consequences, to which I can see no limit, would... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1894 - 1070 sider
...upsetting of the coach might bring a similar action. Unless we confine the operation of such contracts to the parties who entered into them, the most absurd and outrageous con•equences, to which I can see no limit, would ensue. " Referring to the allegation in the declaration... | |
 | Thomas Beven - 1895 - 1072 sider
...Alderson, B., on the unsatisfactory ground that unless the operation of such contracts was confined " to the parties who entered into them the most absurd and outrageous consequences, to which I see no limit, would ensue ; " and Rolfe, B., on the ground that " there was no duty to the plaintiff... | |
| |
