Digest of Cases Decided in British Prize Courts; August, 1914-November, 1927H.M. Stationery Office, 1927 - 126 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 49
Side 5
... ( affirming the decision of the Prize Court 8. L.P.C. 125. ) : The claimants not being the owners of the goods had no locus standi . K. CECILIE [ 1919 ] . A.C. 964 . A neutral claimant to goods seized in neutral vessels failed to comply ...
... ( affirming the decision of the Prize Court 8. L.P.C. 125. ) : The claimants not being the owners of the goods had no locus standi . K. CECILIE [ 1919 ] . A.C. 964 . A neutral claimant to goods seized in neutral vessels failed to comply ...
Side 6
... affirming decisions of the Prize Court ( New South Wales ) ( 32 W.N. 86 ( N.S.W. ) ) ; 1. The shipowners were entitled to the balance of the freight due in the absence of any evidence of any unneutral conduct . 2. Inasmuch as there was ...
... affirming decisions of the Prize Court ( New South Wales ) ( 32 W.N. 86 ( N.S.W. ) ) ; 1. The shipowners were entitled to the balance of the freight due in the absence of any evidence of any unneutral conduct . 2. Inasmuch as there was ...
Side 10
... ( affirming the decision of the Prize Court condemning the vessel and cargo [ 1920 ] . P. 177 ) ; 1. The agreement of 30/4/18 did not operate as a waiver of the belligerent right to capture and con- demn contraband ; 10 PRIZE COURT ...
... ( affirming the decision of the Prize Court condemning the vessel and cargo [ 1920 ] . P. 177 ) ; 1. The agreement of 30/4/18 did not operate as a waiver of the belligerent right to capture and con- demn contraband ; 10 PRIZE COURT ...
Side 12
... ( affirming the decision_of_the Prize Court [ 1915 ] . P. 215 at 267 , 268 ) : The appellant had not proved that he was the owner of the goods . KIM 3. L.P.C. 381 . Evidence that goods of the nature of those seized ( i.e. , cocoa ) would ...
... ( affirming the decision_of_the Prize Court [ 1915 ] . P. 215 at 267 , 268 ) : The appellant had not proved that he was the owner of the goods . KIM 3. L.P.C. 381 . Evidence that goods of the nature of those seized ( i.e. , cocoa ) would ...
Side 13
... affirming the decision of the Prize Court : 1. The claimants had acted under the direction of agents of the German Government , and the goods were destined for that Government and the persons named as consignees had no interest in or ...
... affirming the decision of the Prize Court : 1. The claimants had acted under the direction of agents of the German Government , and the goods were destined for that Government and the persons named as consignees had no interest in or ...
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
affirming the decision ALWINA ANNIE JOHNSON applied appraised values Article 57 belligerent bills of lading British port British vessel captured charterers claim claimants condemning the vessel conditional contraband consignees contraband costs Court in Egypt craft Crown custody damages date of seizure Declaration of London Declaration of Paris decree deliverable demnation DERFFLINGER detained detention DIRIGO discharged DOMALD Egypt enemy character enemy country enemy origin enemy property entitled fact flag freight German German corporation German firm German national German vessel Hague Convention Held affirming Held condemning Held on appeal inasmuch jurisdiction King's ship LI.L.Rep liable to condemnation LUTZOW Majesty MARGARETA 1921 MARIE GLAESER 1914 Marshal Mentd municipal law neutral country neutral port neutral vessel Order in Council OSCAR II outbreak Pages PARCHIM PELLWORM Prize Court proceeds of sale Procurator-General release requisitioned Section seized as prize shipowners shippers SUDMARK Suez Sweden thereof tion Treaty of Versailles vessel under bills voyage ZAMORA
Populære avsnitt
Side 58 - Convention does not apply in this case, because of the "general participation" clause in Article 2 of the Hague Convention of 1907. That clause provided: "The provisions contained in the regulations (rules of land warfare) referred to in Article 1 as well as in the present convention do not apply except between contracting powers, and then only if all the belligerents are parties to the convention.
Side 124 - Belligerents are bound to respect the sovereign rights of neutral Powers and to abstain, in neutral territory or neutral waters, from any act which would, if knowingly permitted by any Power, constitute a violation of neutrality.
Side 115 - Subject to the provisions respecting transfer to another flag, the neutral or enemy character of a vessel is determined by the flag which she is entitled to fly.
Side 114 - Now, therefore, His Majesty, by and with the advice of his Privy Council, is pleased to order, and it is hereby ordered, that during the present hostilities the convention known as the Declaration of London...
Side 122 - III shall be distinguished by being painted white outside, with a horizontal band of red about a metre and a half in breadth. The boats of the ships above mentioned, as also small craft which may be used for hospital work, shall be distinguished by similar painting.
Side 116 - August, 1914, it was ordered that during the present hostilities the convention known as the Declaration of London should, subject to certain additions and modifications therein specified, be adopted and put in force as if the same had been ratified by us.
Side 28 - Every ship taken as prize, and brought into port within the jurisdiction of a prize court, shall forthwith, and without bulk broken, be delivered up to the marshal of the court. If there is no such marshal, then the ship shall be in like manner delivered up to the principal officer of customs at the port.
Side 115 - Whatever may be the ulterior destination of a vessel or of her cargo, she cannot be captured for breach of blockade, if, at the moment, she is on her way to a non-blockaded port.
Side 120 - ... be confiscated. They are only liable to detention on the understanding that they shall be restored after the war without compensation, or to be requisitioned, or even destroyed, on payment of compensation...
Side 122 - The belligerents will have the right to control and visit them; they can refuse to help them, order them off, make them take a certain course, and put a Commissioner on board; they can even detain them, if important circumstances require it.