App. D. C. —, 33 traffic over routes of their own selection. | tal R. Co. 78 Inters. Com. Rep. 328; Waverly Oil Works Co. v. Pennsyl- Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. v. Union P. vania R. Co. 28 Inters. Com. Rep. 621; R. Co. 88 Inters. Com. Rep. 312; Flory Re Lumber Rates, 29 Inters. Com. Rep. Mill. Co. v. Central New England R. Co. 609; Re Routing via Midland Continen- 93 Inters. Com. Rep. 129; Re Routing Cal. C07, 185 Pac. 967 (affirmed in (1921) | v. Escher (1929) 256 U. S. 477, 65 L. ed. 1052, 41 Sup. F. (2d) 556. Ct. Rep. 577) (followed, if at all reason- FLORIDA.-Bloxham v. Consumers' Elecable); Hodge v. McCall (1921) 185 Cal. tric Light & Street R. Co. 36 Fla. 519, 330, 197 Pac. 86; Veterans' Welfare Bd. 29 L.R.A. 507, 51 Am. St. Rep. 44, 18 v. Riley (1922) 189 Cal. 159, 22 A.L.R. So. 444; Ex parte Perry (1916) 71 Fla. 1531, 208 Pac. 678; Pasadena v. Railroad 250, 71 So. 174; Amos v. Mosley (1917) Commission (1923) 192 Cal. 61, 218 Pac. 74 Fla. 555, L.R.A.1918C, 482, 77 So. 619. 412; Riley v. Forbes (1924) 193 Cal. 740, GEORGIA. Solomon V. Cartersville 227 Pac. 768; Riley v. Thompson (1924) (1870) 41 Ga. 157; Howell v. State 193 Cal. 773, 227 Pac. 772; People ex (1883) 71 Ga. 224, 51 Am. Rep. 259; rel. Beede v. Antioch (1911) 17 Cal. App. Temple Baptist Church v. Georgia Ter751, 121 Pac. 945; Godward v. Board of|minal Co. (1907) 128 Ga. 669, 58 S. E. Trustees (1928) Cal. App. 270 157. Pac. 725; Webster Mfg. Co. v. Byrnes (1928) Cal. App., 271 Pac. 771; Zurich General Acci. Liability Ins. Co. v. Stadelman (1929) Cal. App. 276 Pac. 407. COLORADO.-Brown v. State (1881) 5 Colo. 496 (appeal dismissed in (1882) 106 U. S. 95, 27 L. ed. 132, 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 175); Re State Lands (1893) 18 Colo. 359, 32 Pac. 986; People ex rel. Bentley v. Le Fevre (1895) 21 Colo. 218, 40 Pac. 882; Calhoun Gold Min. Co. v. Ajax Gold Min. Co. (1899) 27 Colo. 1, 50 L.R.A. 209, 83 Am. St. Rep. 17, 59 Pac. 607, 20 Mor. Min. Rep. 192 (affirmed in (1901) 182 U. S. 499, 45 L. ed. 1200, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 885, 21 Mor. Min. Rep. 381); People v. Higgins (1919) 67 Colo. 441, 184 Pac. 365; Hessick v. Moynihan (1927) 83 Colo. 43, 262 Pac. 907. HAWAII.-Pasquoin v. Sanders (1911) 20 Haw. 352; Territory v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co. (1916) 23 Haw. 387; Re Hawaii County (1920) 25 Haw. 372; Ewa Plantation Co. v. Wilder (1922) 26 Haw. 299. IDAHO.-Bashore v. Adolf (1925) 41 Idaho, 84, 41 A.L.R. 932, 238 Pac. 534. ILLINOIS.-Isaacs v. Steel (1841) 4 Ill. 97; Bruce v. Schuyler (1847) 9 Ill. 221, 46 Am. Dec. 447; Mathews v. Shores (1860) 24 Ill. 27; Russell v. Rumsey (1864) 35 Ill. 362; Comstock v. Cover (1864) 35 Ill. 470; People ex rel. Dunham v. Morgan (1878) 90 Ill. 558; People ex rel. Badger v. Loewenthal (1879) 93 Ill. 191; People ex rel. Stevens v. Fidelity & C. Co. (1894) 153 Ill. 25, 26 L.R.A. 295, 38 N. E. 752; People ex rel. Neil v. Knopf (1898) 171 Ill. 191, 49 N. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.-United States E. 424; Chicago Union Traction Co. v. ex rel. Wedderburn v. Bliss (1898) 12 Chicago (1904) 209 Ill. 444, 70 N. E. App. D. C. 485; Payne v. Houghton 659; Nye v. Foreman (1905) 215 Ill. 285, (1903) 22 App. D. C. 234 (affirmed in 74 N. E. 140; Eddy v. Morgan (1905) (1904) 194 U. S. 88, 48 L. ed. 888, 24 216 Ill. 437, 75 N. E. 174; Cook County Sup. Ct. Rep. 590); Allen v. United v. Healy (1906) 222 Ill. 310, 78 N. E. States (1905) 26 App. D. C. 8 (affirmed 623; Whittemore v. People (1907) 227 in (1906) 203 U. S. 476, 51 L. ed. 281, Ill. 453, 81 N. E. 427, 10 Ann. Cas. 44; 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 141); United States v. J. Burton Co. v. Chicago (1908) 236 Ill. Day (1906) 27 App. D. C. 458; United 383, 86 N. E. 93, 15 Ann. Cas. 965 (reStates ex rel. Daly v. Macfarland (1907) versing (1908) 140 Ill. App. 344); Peo28 App. D. C. 552; Ballinger v. United ple ex rel. Healy v. Shedd (1909) 241 Ill. States (1909) 33 App. D. C. 302 (aflirmed 155, 89 N. E. 332 (affirmed in (1910) 217 in (1912) 223 U. S. 683, 56 L. ed 610, U. S. 597, 54 L. ed. 896, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 356); United States ex 696); Lake County v. Westerfield (1916) rel. Kreh v. Ingham (1912) 38 App. D. 273 Ill. 124, 112 N. E. 308, Ann. Cas. C. 379; Kalbfus v. Siddons (1914) 42 1918E, 102 (affirming (1915) 196 Ill. App. D. C. 310; Luchs v. Christman App. 432); People v. Illinois C. R. Co. (1914) 42 App. D. C. 326; King v. Dis- (1916) 273 Ill. 220, 112 N. E. 700; Mctrict of Columbia (1921) 51 App. D. C. Cann v. Retirement Bd. (1928) 331 Ill. 160, 277 Fed. 562; Coombe v. United 193, 162 N. E. 859 (reversing (1927) 246 States (1925) 55 App. D. C. 190, 3 F. Ill. App. 471); Harrison v. People (1900) (2d) 714; Wright v. Wardman (1925)|97 Ill. App. 421 (reversed in (1902) 195 55 App. D. C. 318, 5 F. (2d) 380; Tate Ill. 466, 63 N. E. 191). via Salt Lake & U. R. Co. 95 Inters. Com. Rep. 237. The commission had authority to make the order. C. & Y. R. Co. v. United States) 261 U. LOUISIANA. Caulker v. Banks (1825) 3 Mart. N. S. 532; Cox v. Williams (1826) 5 Mart. N. S. 140; State v. Comptoir National D'Escompte (1899) 51 La. Ann. 1272, 26 So. 91; State v. Southern P. Co. (1915) 137 La. 435, L.R.A.1915F, 1140, 68 So. 819; State ex rel. Guillot v. Central Bank & T. Co. (1918) 143 Ky. 1053, 79 So. 857; State ex rel. Payne v. Exchange Bank (1920) 147 La. 25, 84 So. 481; Penick & Ford v. Ehret (1928) 166 La. 1, 116 So. 572. New England Divisions Case (Akron, INDIANA. Franklin County v. Bunting | Board of Education (1929) 229 Ky. 325, (1887) 111 Ind. 143, 12 N. E. 151; Par-17 S. W. (2d) 210. vin v. Wimberg (1892) 130 Ind. 561, 15 L.R.A. 775, 30 Am. St. Rep. 254, 30 N. E. 790; White County v. Gwin (1894) 136 Ind. 562, 22 L.R.A. 402, 36 N. E. 237; State Tax Comrs. v. Holliday (1898) 150 Ind. 216, 42 L.R.A. 826, 49 N. E. 14; Arnett v. State (1906) 168 Ind. 180, 8 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1192, 80 N. E. 153; Metropolitan L. Ins. Co. v. State (1917) 186 Ind. 407, 116 N. E. 579; Logansport Credit Exch. v. Sands (1913) 54 Ind. App. 562, 101 N. E. 19; Welliver v. Coate (1917) 65 Ind. App. 195, 114 N. E. 775; State v. Fidelity Health & Acci. Co. (1923) 79 Ind. App. 377, 135 N. E. 387. IOWA.-Banker's Mut. Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank (1906) 131 Iowa, 456, 108 N. W. 1046; New York L. Ins. Co. v. Burbank (1927) Iowa, -, 216 N. W. 742. KANSAS.-Lewis v. Lewelling (1894) 53 Kan. 201, 23 L.R.A. 510, 36 Pac. 351 (some consideration); Harrison v. Masonic Mut. Ben. Soc. (1899) 61 Kan. 134, 59 Pac. 266. - V. KENTUCKY. Barbour Louisville (1885) 83 Ky. 95; Harrison v. Com. (1885) 83 Ky. 162; Com. v. Owensboro, F. of R. & G. R. Co. (1893) 95 Ky. 60, 23 S. W. 868; Clark's Run & S. River Turnp. Road Co. v. Com. (1895) 96 Ky. 525, 29 S. W. 360; Auditor of Public Accounts v. Cain (1901) 22 Ky. L. Rep. 1888, 61 S. W. 1016; Louisville v. Louisville School Bd. (1905) 119 Ky. 574, 84 S. W. 729; Com. v. Gregory (1905) 121 Ky. 256, 89 S. W. 168; Com. ex rel. Louisville v. Ross (1909) 135 Ky. 315, 122 S. W. 161; Com. v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. (1911) 143 Ky. 314, 136 S. W. 1032 (on rehearing in (1911) 144 Ky. 263, 136 S. W. 1041); Louisville v. Bd. of Education (1913) 154 Ky. 316, 157 S. W. 379; Bosworth v. Marshall (1915) 165 Ky. 32, 176 S. W. 348; Greene v. Gilbert (1916) 168 Ky. 380, 182 S. W. 202; Greene v. Jones (1916) 170 Ky. 757, 186 S. W. 675; Baltimore & O. S. W. R. Co. v. Com. (1917) 177 Ky. 566, 198 S. W. 35; Barker v. Crum (1917) 177 Ky. 637, L.R.A.1918F, 673, 198 S. W. 211; State Text Book Commission v. Weathers (1919) 184 Ky. 748, 213 S. W. 207; Gilbert v. Greene (1919) 185 Ky. 817, 216 S. W. 105; Sewell v. Bennett (1920) 187 Ky. 626, 220 S. W. 517; Louisville v. MAINE. Brown v. Foster (1895) 88 Me. 49, 31 L.R.A. 116, 33 Atl. 662; State v. Boston & M. R..Co. (1923) 123 Me. 48, 121 Atl. 541. MARYLAND.-Kiersted v. State (1829) 1 Gill. & J. 231; Baltimore v. Johnson (1903) 96 Md. 737, 61 L.R.A. 568, 54 Atl. 646; Musgrove v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. (1909) 111 Md. 629, 75 Atl. 245; Baltimore v. Machen (1918) 132 Md. 618, 104 Atl. 175; Hess v. Westminster Sav. Bank (1919) 134 Md. 125, 106 Atl. 263; Smith v. State (1919) 134 Md. 473, 107 Atl. 255; Graham v. Joyce (1926) 151 Md. 298, 134 Atl. 332; Arnreich v. State (1926) 150 Md. 91, 132 Atl. 430; Burroughs Adding Mach. Co. v. State (1924) 146 Md. 192, 126 Atl. 127. MASSACHUSETTS.-Burrage v. Bristol County (1911) 210 Mass. 299, 96 N. E. 719; Atty. Gen. v. Barney (Swift ex rel. State Treasurer v. Barney) (1912) 211 Mass. 134, 39 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1024, 97 N. E. 750; Tyler v. Treasurer (1917) 226 Mass. 306, L.R.A.1917D, 633, 115 N. E. 300; Malaguti v. Rosen (1928) 262 Mass. 555, 160 N. E. 532. MICHIGAN. Malonny v. Mahar (1847) 1 Mich. 26; Clark v. Mowyer (1858) 5 Mich. 462; Johnson v. Ballou (1874) 28 Mich. 379; Westbrook v. Miller (1885) 56 Mich. 148, 22 N. W. 256; Employers' Liability Assur. Co. v. Commissioner of Insurance (1887) 64 Mich. 614, 31 N. W. 542; Atty. Gen. ex rel. Scott v. Glaser (1894) 102 Mich. 405, 61 N. W. 648; People ex rel. Atty.-Gen. v. Michigan C. R. Co. (1906) 145 Mich. 140, 108 N. W. 772; University of Michigan v. Auditor Gen. (1911) 167 Mich. 444, 132 N. W. 1037; People ex rel. Atty. Gen. v. Haggerty (1911) 167 Mich. 682, 133 N. W. 828; People ex rel. Simmons v. Anderson (1917) 198 Mich. 38, 164 N. W. 481; R. Co. v. United States, 263 U. S. 456, | Co. 265 U. S. 425, 436, 437, 68 L. ed. 68 L. ed. 388, 33 A.L.R. 472, 44 Sup. Ct. 1087, 1093, 1094, 44 Sup. Ct. Rep. 560; Rep. 169; St. Louis Southwestern R. Co. United States v. New York C. R. Co. v. United States, 245 U. S. 136, 143, 144, 62 L. ed. 199, 207, 208, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 272 U. S. 457, 461, 71 L. ed. 350, 353, 49; United States v. American R. Exp. 47 A.L.R. 1044, 47 Sup. Ct. Rep. 130. Owosso Union School Dist. v. Goodrich | 284 Mo. 447, 224 S. W. 835; State ex rel. (1920) 208 Mich. 646, 175 N. W. 1009; Kimbrell v. Becker (1921) 291 Mo. 409, Commerce-Guardian Trust & Sav. Bank 237 S. W. 117; State ex rel. National L. v. State (1924) 228 Mich. 316, 200 N. W. Ins. Co. v. Hyde (1922) 292 Mo. 342, 241 267 (denied in (1925) 268 U. S. 700, 69 S. W. 396; State ex rel. Barrett v. First L. ed. 1164, 45 Sup. Ct. Rep. 636); Peo- Nat. Bank (1923) 297 Mo. 397, 30 A.L.R. ple v. Detroit, G. H. & M. R. Co. (1924) 918, 249 S. W. 619 (affirmed in (1924) 228 Mich. 596, 200 N. W. 536; People v. 263 U. S. 640, 68 L. ed. 486, 44 Sup. Ct. Robinson (1928) 241 Mich. 497, 217 N. Rep. 213); Re Publication of Docket W. 902. (1921) Mo., 232 S. W. 454 (overruling (1913) 266 Mo. 48, 187 S. W. 1174) (at least persuasive); State ex rel. Union Electric Light & P. Co. v. Baker (1927) 316 Mo. 853, 293 S. W. 399; State ex rel. White v. Fendorff (1927) 317 Mo. 579, 296 S. W. 787; Lefman v. Schuler (1927) 317 Mo. 671, 296 S. W. 808; State v. Freeland (1927) 318 Mo. 560, 300 S. W. 675; State ex rel. Cobb v. Thompson (1928) Mo., 5 S. W. (2d) 57; State ex rel. Gentry v. Long-Bell Lumber Co. (1928) Mo., 12 S. W. (2d) 64; Huntsville Trust Co. v. Noel (1928) Mo., 12 S. W. (2d) 751. MINNESOTA.-State v. Moffett (1896) 64 Minn. 292, 67 N. W. 68; O'Connor v. Gertgens (1902) 85 Minn. 481, 89 N. W. 866 (affirmed in (1903) 191 U. S. 237, 48 L. ed. 163, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 94); State v. Northern P. R. Co. (1905) 95 Minn. 43, 103 N. W. 731; Thorne v. State (1920) 145 Minn. 412, 177 N. W. 638; Re Boutin (1921) 149 Minn. 148, 182 N. W. 990; State v. Church of Incarnation (1924) 158 Minn. 48, 196 N. W. 802; Hennepin County v. Ryberg (1926) 168 Minn. 385, 210 N. W. 105. MISSISSIPPI.-Illinois C. R. Co. v. Middleton (1915) 109 Miss. 199, 68 So. 146; State ex rel. Foreman v. Wheatley (1917) 113 Miss. 555, 74 So. 427; State ex rel. Collins v. Grenada Cotton Compress Co. (1920) 123 Miss. 191, 85 So. 137; Robertson v. Texas Oil Co. (1926) 141 Miss. 356, 106 So. 449. MISSOURI.-Ross v. Kansas City, St. J. & C. B. R. Co. (1892) 111 Mo. 18, 19 S. W. 541; Venable v. Wabash W. R. Co. (1893) 112 Mo. 102, 18 L.R.A. 68, 20 S. W. 493; Pugh v. Kansas City, St. J. & C. B. R. Co. (1893) 118 Mo. 506, 24 S. W. 440; State ex rel. Hayes v. IIannibal & St. J. R. Co. (1893) 135 Mo. 618, 37 S. W. 532; Westerman v. Supreme Lodge, K. P. 196 Mo. 670, 5 L.R.A.(N.S.) 1114, 94 S. W. 470; State ex rel. Kiel v. Riechmann (1911) 239 Mo. 81, 142 S. W. 304; Timmonds v. Kennish (1912) 244 Mo. 318, 149 S. W. 652; Folk v. St. Louis (1913) 250 Mo. 116, 157 S. W. 71; State ex rel. Koeln v. St. Louis Y. M. C. A. (1914) 259 Mo. 233, 168 S. W. 589; State ex rel. Gass v. Gordon (1915) 266 Mo. 394, 181 S. W. 1016, Ann. Cas. 1918B, 191; State ex rel. Kinloch Teleph. Co. v. Roach (1916) 269 Mo. 437, 190 S. W. 862; State ex rel. Chick v. Davis (1918) 273 Mo. 660, 201 S. W. 529; State ex rel. McAllister v. Cupples Station Light, Heat & P. Co. (1920) 283 Mo. 115, 223 S. W. 75; Macon County v. Williams (1920) MONTANA. Hilburn v. St. Paul, M. & M. R. Co. (1899) 23 Mont. 229, 58 Pac. 551, 811; State ex rel. Cotter v. District Ct. (1914) 49 Mont. 146, 140 Pac. 732; State ex rel. Morgan v. Knight (1926) 76 Mont. 71, 245 Pac. 267. NEBRASKA. State ex rel. Platte County v. Sheldon (1907) 79 Neb. 455, 113 N. W. 208; Douglas County v. Vinsonhaler (1908) 82 Neb. 810, 118 N. W. 1058; Rohrer v. Hastings Brewing Co. (1908) 83 Neb. 111, 119 N. W. 27, 17 Ann. Cas. 998; Laub v. Furnas County (1920) 104 Neb. 402, 177 N. W. 749; Kennedy v. Royal Highlanders (1922) 109 Neb. 24, 189 N. W. 612; State ex rel. Dakota City v. Bryan (1924) 112 Neb. 692, 200 N. W. 870. NEVADA. State ex rel. Springmeyer v. Brodigan (1912) 35 Nev. 35, 126 Pac. 680; State ex rel. Kendall v. Cole (1915) 38 Nev. 215, 148 Pac. 551; Smith v. Southern P. R. Co. (1928) 50 Nev. 377, 262 Pac. 935. NEW HAMPSHIRE.-Bailey v. Rolfe (1844) 16 N. H. 247; Wyatt v. State Bd. (1908) 74 N. H. 552, 70 Atl. 387; Atty. Gen. ex rel. Lang v. Duncan (1911) 76 N. H. 11, 78 Atl. 925. NEW JERSEY.-State v. Kelsey (1882) 44 N. J. L. 1. 4 NEW YORK.-Van Loon v. Lyon (1871) Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton argued the By 15 (3) of the Interstate Com- 22); Troup v. Haight (1824) Hopk. Ch. merce Act the commission was both au- United States v. Abilene & S. R. Co. 548, 148 N. E. 699); McCabe v. Aulls NORTH CAROLINA.--Gill v. Wake Coun- NORTH DAKOTA.-State v. Stockwell V. ОнIO.-Industrial Commission OKLAHOMA.-Hoffman v. Pawnee Coun- OREGON.-Biggs v. McBride (1889) 17 in the public interest, the district court erred. In substituting its judgment for the judgment of the Commission as to whether the through routes required by Railroad Commission v. Chicago B. & the order to be established are desirable Q. R. Co. 257 U. S. 563, 585, 66 L. ed. 22 Pac. 1110; Twohy Bros. Co. v. Ochoco | Robinson (1915) 107 Tex. 315, 179 S. W. Irrig. Dist. (1922) 108 Or. 1, 210 Pac. 123; Slaughter v. Yoakum County (1917) 873, 216 Pac. 189; Spencer v. Portland 109 Tex. 42, 195 S. W. 1129; Moorman (1925) 114 Or. 381, 235 Pac. 279; Port- v. Terrell (1918) 109 Tex. 173, 202 S. W. land v. Welch (1928) 126 Or. 293, 269 727; Koy v. Schneider (1920) 110 Tex. Pac. 868; Kappa Gamma Rho v. Marion 394, 221 S. W. 880 (denying rehearing County (1929) Or., 279 Pac. 555. of (1920) 110 Tex. 369, 218 S. W. 479); PENNSYLVANIA.-Com. v. Mann (1895) First Texas State Ins. Co. v. Smalley 168 Pa. 290, 31 Atl. 1003; Garr v. Fuls (1921) 111 Tex. 68, 228 S. W. 550; (1926) 286 Pa. 137, 133 Atl. 150; Com. Neubert v. Chicago, R. I. & G. R. Co. v. Quaker City Cab Co. (1926) 287 Pa. (1927) 116 Tex. 644, 53 A.L.R. 1224, 296 161, 134 Atl. 404 (reversed on another S. W. 1090; Slocomb v. Cameron Indepoint in (1928) 277 U. S. 389, 72 L. ed. pendent School Dist. (1926) 116 Tex. 927, 48 Sup. Ct. Rep. 553); Reeves's Ap- 288, 288 S. W. 1064; State v. Gunter peal (1907) 33 Pa. Super. Ct. 196. (1904) 36 Tex. Civ. App. 381, 81 S. W. RHODE ISLAND.-Dyer v. Osborne (1875) 1028; Broussard v. Cruse (1913; Tex. 11 R. I. 321, 23 Am. Rep. 460; Provi- Civ. App.) 154 S. W. 347; Fielder v. dence v. Hall (1928) R. I. 142 Houston Oil Co. (1919) Tex., 208 Atl. 156. S. W. 158 (reargument denied in (1919) Tex. ; 210 S. W. 797); Brown v. Amarillo (1915; Tex. Civ. App.). 180 S. W. 654; Cain v. Garvey (1916; Tex. Civ. App.) 187 S. W. 1111; State v. Houston Oil Co. (1917; Tex. Civ. App.) 194 S. W. 422; Harris County v. Hammond (1918; Tex. Civ. App.) 203 S. W. 445; State v. Houston & T. C. R. Co. (1918; Tex. Civ. App.) 209 S. W. 820; Hammond v. Harris County (1922; Tex. Civ. App.) 243 S. W. 1002; Dallas v. Texas Employers' Ins. Asso. (1922; Tex. Civ. App.) 245 S. W. 946 (error dismissed in (1924) Tex., 265 S. W. 1113); Kilpatrick v. Compensation Claim Bd. (1924; Tex. Civ. App.) 259 S. W. 164; Neff v. Elgin (1925; Tex. Civ. App.) 270 S. W. 873; Belton v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank (1925; Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 914 (affirmed in (1926) — Tex. —, 283 S. W. 164). SOUTH DAKOTA.-Jordan v. Mellette County (1917) 38 S. D. 299, 161 N. W. 279 (modifying (1916) 38 S. D. 275, 160 N. W. 815); Superior Lodge, D. H. v. Van Camp (1918) 40 S. D. 142, 166 N. W. 545; Burke v. Burkhart (1920) 42 S. D. 604, 176 N. W. 743; Tulare Independent School Dist. v. Crandon School Dist. (1924) 47 S. D. 391, 199 N. W. 451; State ex rel. Driscoll v. Smith (1925) 49 S. D. 106, 206 N. W. 233. TENNESSEE.-Austin v. Shelton (1909) 122 Tenn. 634, 127 S. W. 446; Chattanooga Plow Co. v. Hays (1911) 125 Tenn. 148, 140 S. W. 1068; Cumberland Lodge v. Nashville (1912) 127 Tenn. 248, 154 S. W. 1141; State ex rel. Pitts v. Nashville Baseball Club (1912) 127 Tenn. 292, 154 S. W. 1151, Ann. Cas. 1914B, 1243; Pryor v. Marion County (1918) 140 Tenn. 399, L.R.A.1918F, 820, 204 S. W. 1152; Mengel Box Co. v. Stevens (1918) 141 Tenn. 373, 210 S. W. 637; Sloan v. Columbia (1920) 144 Tenn. 197, 232 S. W. 663. TEXAS.-Edwards v. James (1851) 7 Tex. 372; Hancock v. McKinney (1851) 7 Tex. 384; Dean v. State (1881) 54 Tex. 313; Galveston, H. & S. A. R. Co. v. State (1891) 81 Tex. 573, 17 S. W. 67; Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. State (1902) 95 Tex. 507, 68 S. W. 777; McGee v. Corbin (1902) 96 Tex. 35, 70 S. W. 79; Tolleson v. Rogan (1903) 96 Tex. 424, 73 S. W. 520; State v. Brady (1909) 102 Tex. 408, 118 S. W. 128 (reversing (1908; Tex. Civ. App.) 114 S. W. 895); McCuistion v. Fenet (1912; Tex. Civ. App.) 144 S. W. 1155 (reversed in (1912) 105 Tex. 299, 147 S. W. 867); Chambers v. UTAH.-Schuyler v. Southern P. Co. (1910) 37 Utah, 612, 109 Pac. 1025 (affirmed in (1913) 227 U. S. 601, 57 L. ed. 662, 43 L.R.A. (N.S.) 901, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 277); State Land Comrs. v. Ririe (1920) 56 Utah, 213, 190 Pac. 59; Stillman v. Lynch (1920) 56 Utah, 540, 12 A.L.R. 552, 192 Pac. 272; Murdock v. Mabey (1922) 59 Utah, 346, 203 Pac. 651. VERMONT.-State v. Rutland R. Co. (1908) 81 Vt. 508, 71 Atl. 197. VIRGINIA. Hamilton v. McNeil (1856) 13 Gratt. 389; Smith v. Bryan (1902) 100 Va. 199, 40 S. E. 652; Atlantic & D. R. Co. v. Lyons (1902) 101 Va. 1, 42 S. E. 932; Virginia Coal & I. Co. v. Keystone Coal & I. Co. (1903) 101 Va. 723, 45 S. E. 291; Com. v. Armour & Co. (1916) 118 Va. 242, 87 S. E. 610 (af |