Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

Page.

198 234 164

Wilcox et al., Ferrier v........
Williams et al., Pfaff v
Winans v. Mills et al....
Winqvist, Lars
Wisconsin Central Railroad Com-

pany v. Stinka.... Witt, Hickson's Heirs v. Witzel v. Brush....

Page.

470 Woodley, James... 455 Woodward v. Percival et al 254 Woolway v. Day.... 323

Yancey, Mary 344 422 554 | Zeake, Brown v

360

529

TABLE OF CASES CITED.

(The abbreviation "L. D.” (Land Decisions) refers to this publication; “B. L. P.," to Brainard's Legal

Precedents; "1 C. L. L.," to Copp's Public Land Laws, Ed. 1875; "2 C. L. L.," to Copp's Public Land Laws, Ed. 1882; "C.L.O.," to Copp's Land Owner; "C. M. D.," to Copp's Mining Decisions; "C. M. L.," to Copp's Mineral Lands; "Lester," to Lester's Land Laws and Decisions; “Rep.,' to the Reporter; "S. M. D.," to Sickles Mining Laws and Decisions; and “C. Cls.," to Court of Claims.)

Page.

Page. Abrams, J. H.; 3 L. D., 106.

349 Callahan v. McLaughlin ; 10 C. L. O., 256.. 259 Adair v. Neal; 3 L. D., 95.. 539 Campbell v. Moore; 3 L. D., 462

518 Alford v. Barnum et al.; 45 Cal., 482. 478 Carrick, Robert; 3 L. D., 558

252 Allman v. Thulon; C. L. L., 690. 338 Carson v. Smith; 12 Minn., 546

586 American Hill Quartz Mine; C. M. L., 257 477 Caward, J.J.; 3 L. D., 505

462 Anly c. Sando; 2 L. D., 142

167 Cedar Rapids Railroad Company v. HerAtlantic and Pacific Railroad Company;

ring; 110 U.S., 27

429 2 L. D., 522.

501 Central Pacific Railroad Company v. Orr; Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Company v.

2 L.D., 525.

354 Fisher; 1 L. D., 406....

103 Central Pacific Railroad Company v. Wol. Atherton v. Fowler; 96 U. S., 513. .140, 388, 502 ford's Heirs; 3 L. D., 264

354 Aurrecæcbea v. Bangs; 114 U.S., 381. 579 Chaffee, A.J.; 1 L. D., 625..

25 Austin v. Norin; 4 L. D., 461.

518 Chambers v. Harrington; 111 U. S., 350 ... 223 Austin v. Rice; 9 C. L. O., 151

87 Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge;
11 Pet., 420

132, 429 Bagnell v. Broderick ; 13 Pet., 436. 367 Chotard v. Pope; 12 Wheat., 586.

465 Bailey v. Olson ; 2 L. D., 40 553 Chrisinger, R. M. ; 4 L. D., 347.

544 Baker, G. W.; 4 L. D., 451...

550
Christensen, Maren; 4 L. D., 317

445 Baker v. State of California ; 4 L.), 137 345 Clark v. Timm; 4 L. D., 175..

543 Ballard v. McKinney; 1 L. D., 483 84 Cleary v. Smith; 3 L. D., 465..

436 Banks v. Smith; 2 L. D., 44. 561 Cleaves v. French; 3 L. D., 533

99, 349 Bartch v. Kennedy; 3 L. D., 437

383
Cliff, Henry; 3 L. D., 216

210, 457, 586 Bartlett v. Dudley; 1 L. D., 186 369 Cogswell, C. P.; 3 L. D., 23

350, 545 Beadle, William; 11 C. L. O., 134. 392 Collar v. Collar; 4 L. D., 26.

462 Beecher o. Wetherby; 5 Otto, 517.

391 Condon v. Arnold; 2 L. D., 96.. 242, 462, 518 Belk o. Meagher; 104 U.S., 279 140 Conlin v. Yarwood ; 2 C. L. L., 593

64, 83 Bender o. Voss; 2 L. D., 269.. 509 Cooper v. Roberts; 18 How., 173

391 Bennett u. Gates; 3 L. D., 377

Copeland, James ; 4 L. D., 276.

413 Benschoter u. Williams; 3 L. D., 419. 319 Cotton v. United States; 11 How., 229

392 Bishop, George $. ; 1 L. D., 95 466, 493 Cregg, ex parte; 2 Curtis, 98..

109 Bishop v. Porter; 3 L. D., 103

518 Cræsus Company v. Colorado Company; Bivins v. Shelly; 2 L. D., 282. 583 19 Fed. Rep., 78..

565 Bohall v. Dilla; 114 U.S., 47.. ..64, 83, 200, 367 Crooks v. Hadsell; 3 L. D., 258.

165, 263 Bradford, George K. ; 4 L.D., 269 454, 551 Curtis v. Griffes; 1 L. D., 175

164 Branagan et. al. o. Dulaney; 2 L. D., 744.. 317 Brown o. United States; 113 U. S., 568.... 155, 588 Davis v. Crans et al., 3 L. D., 218.

22, 457 Brush 1. Ware; 15 Pet., 93.. 367 Dayton v. Scott; 11 C. L. O., 202

471 Bundy v. Livingston; 1 L. D., 179..29, 246, 471, 587 Deffeback v. Hawke; 115 U. S., 392

556, 561 Barns, George T.; 3 L. D., 561.. 321 Dejan, John; 8 C. L. O., 43

132 Bush, Franklin L., et. al.; 2 L. D., 788

65 De Lendrecie, Eugene J.; 3 L. D., 110.... 83 Butler v. Moban; 3 L. D., 513 241 Dickson v. Schlater; 11 C.L.O., 23

159 Butte Townsite; 3 C. L. O., 131 21 Dorame v. Towers; 1C, L. L., 438

436 Batterfield & Phelps ; 2 L. D., 229. 89 Downey v. Rogers; 2 L.D., 707

284 Bykerk v. Oldemeyer ; 2 L. D., 51. 23,465 Doyle v. Wilson; 2 L. D., 28.

227

Dubuque and Pacific Railroad Company v. California, State of; 2 L. D., 643 142 Litchfield; 23 How., 66..

132, 429 Call 0. Swaim; 3 L. D., 46.. 259, 424 Ducros, Rudolphus; 1 C. L. O., 38 ........ 132 Lanfear v. Hunley; 4 Wall, 204

88

Page.

Page.

[blocks in formation]

Hendry, George W. ; 4 L. D., 175.

345

Hewlett v. Darby; 1 L. D., 115.

8G
Hicks, Issac; 7 C. L.O., 71

173
Hooper v. Ferguson ; 2 L. D., 712.

C1, 478

Hopkins v. Daniels; 4 L. D., 126

256

Hoskyn, Joseph; 4 L. D.,

.349, 419

Houston v. Coyle; 2 L. D., 58, 87 ..255, 425, 440, 537

Hoyt v. Sullivan ; 2 L. D., 283

508

Hugbes o. Tipton ; 2 L. D., 334.

283

Hughes v. United States ; 4 Wall., 232

321, 345

Humble v. McMurtrie; 2 L. D., 161.

330

Hunt v. Lavin; 3 L. D., 499

424, 451
Hunter, H. T. ; 2 L. D., 39

539

591

90

[ocr errors]

Fergus v. Gray; 2 L. D., 296

539, 588
Fitch v. Clark; 2 L. D., 262.

494
Flemington v. Eddy; 3 L. D., 432

494

Florey and Moat; 4 L. D., 365....

447

Florida Railway and Navigation Company
v. Miller; 3 L. D., 324.

270
Folsom, J. F.; 2 L. D., 101..

331
Frank, Samuel M.; 2 L.D., 628.

339

Frasher et al. v. O'Connor; 115 U. S,, 102. 173, 372

French, William; 2 L. D., 235..

325
French v. Fyan et al. ; 3 Otto, 169

549
Fritzsche, Edward F.; 3 L. D., 208.

440

Fussell v. Gregg et al., 113, U.S., 550...... 373

Jackson's case; 19 C. Cls., 504..

6

Jackson v. Beach; 1 Johnson's Cases, 399 364

Jackson v. Roby; 109 U. S., 440

223
Johnson v. Gjevre; 3 L. D., 157....

366
Johnson v. Halvorson; 8 C. L. O., 56. ... 248
Johnson v. Johnson ; 4 L. D., 158

308, 531
Johnson v. Towsley; 13 Wall., 72

515
Johnson, William; 4 L. D., 11..

398
Jones v. Finley ; 10 C. L. O., 365

283

Kansas Pacific Railroad Companyv. Atchi-

son, Topeka and Santa Fé Railroad

Company; 112 U. S., 414

429

Kansas Pacific Railway Company v. Dun.

meyer; 113 U. S., 629.

342

Kelly v. Quast; 2 L. D., 627

117, 140
Kopnedy, Rosanna; 10 C. L. O., 152...

72
Keith v. Towneite; 3 L. D., 356

586
Kile v. Tubbs; 6 C. L. O., 108..

142
Kirstein v. Madden; 38 Cal., 163

539

Kissack, Margaret; 2 C. L. L., 421

350

Kniskern v. Hastings and Dakota Rail.
way Company; 6 C. L. O., 78

..249, 279, 404
Kurtz v. Holt; 4 L. D., 56...

259

Gaberel v. Guerire ; 2 C. L. L., 598.

57

Gahan v. Garrett; 1 L. D., 164.

494, 543

Galloway v. Winston ; 1 L. D., 169. .87, 369, 494

Garcia, Juan Rafael; 1 L. D., 287

501

Garland v. Wynn; 20 How., 6

367

Geer v. Farrington; 4 L. D., 410

529

Glaze v. Bogardus; 2 L. D., 311.

125

Glover, C. R. ; 4 L. D., 211

565

Gobrman v. Ford ; 8 C. L.O., 6... 23, 465, 581

Gold Blossom Mine; 2 L, D., 767...

477
Goodnight v. Anderson ; 2 L. D., 624

83
Good Return Mining Company; 4 L. D.,
221

284, 363, 374

Gould v. Weisbecker; 1 L. D., 142..

87

Governeur's Heirs v. Robertson; 11

Wheat., 332..

565

Grabam, Fremont S.; 4 L. D., 310........ 393, 451
Graham v. Hastings and Dakota Railway
Company; 1 L. D., 380

250, 457
Graves v. Keith ; 3 L. D., 309..

241, 255

Green v. Graham; 7 C. L. O., 105.

245, 522

Griffin v. Marsh ; 2 L. D., 28

227

Grimsbaw v. Taylor; 4 L. D., 330

395

Grinnell v. Railroad Company; 103 U.S.,

428

134

Lansdale v. Daniel; 10 Otto, 113....

03

Lavallette v. United States; 1C. Cls., 149. 7
Lawless v. Anderson ; 7 C. L. O., 68..

140
Leavenworth, Lawrence and Galveston

Railroad Company v. United States; 92
U.S., 733...

.217,392, 409, 429

Le Cocq cases; 2 L. D., 784

65

Ledoux v. Black; 18 How., 473

294

Lientz et al. v. Victor et al.; 17 Cal., 271 ..

478

Lindsey v. Howes; 2 Black, 554.

63
Litz, David P.; 3 L. D., 181

468
Lytle v. Arkansas; 9 How., 314...248, 406, 515, 588

Malines, Maria; 2 C. L. 0., 23.

592

Mann v. Huk; 3 L. D., 452. . 117, 140, 506
Marshall, James H.; 3 L. D., 411

64,83
Martin, Charles C.; 3 L. D., 373..424, 451, 466, 493
Martin v. Henderson; 2 L. D, 172.

283
Maughn, George W.; 9 C. L. O., 56

578
McAvinney v. McNamara; 3 L. D., 552.. 23
McCall v. Molnar; 2 L. D., 265..

506, 540
McClure case; 19 C. Cls., 23
McClure o. Fritze; 11 C. L. O., 226

86
McConliss, Rufus; 2 L. D., 622.

27, 462

219

135, 519

Page.

Page. MeMurdie v.Central Pacific Railroad Com.

Sampson v. Smiley; 13 Wall., 91

367 pany, 8 C. L.O., 36..... 117, 140 Sandell v. Davenport; 2 L. D., 157...

64 Melville & Kelly ; 9 C. L. O., 199.

191 Sandiman v. Breach; 7 Barn. and Cress., 96 Menard's heirs v. Massey; 8 How., 301 .. 294 Santee Sioux Reservation; 3 L.D., 534... 479 Merrill, F. H.; 2 L. D., 106. 389 Schulenberg v. Harriman; 21 Wall., 44

59 Merritt o. Short et al.; 3 L. D., 433

283 Seevers, administrator, v. Hamilton, et Miller, Jobn W.; 1 L. D., 83..

23, 465
UX ; 11 Iowa, 71.

539 Milne o. Dowling; 4 L. D., 378. .440, 537, 591 Selby's case; 6 Mich., 193

586 Mitchell 0. Robinson; 3 L. D., 546. 506, 458 Shadduck v. Horner; 6 C. L. 0., 113..

509 Moffatt v. United States; 112 U. S., 25 ... 424 Shepley v. Cowan; 01 U.S., 330.

582 Molyneux v. Young; 7 C. L. O., 107 140 Shippard, George W.; 2 L. D., 154.

167 Moore v. Robbins ; 96 U.S., 530 117, 173, 316 Showers v. Friend; 3 L. D., 210.

283 Myers v. Croft; 13 Wall., 291

136, 350
Silver v. Ladd; 7 Wall., 219

63 Sim v. McGrew; 2 L D., 324.

125 Newball v. Sanger ; 92 U. S., 701 .....357, 485, 580

Simmons v. Wagner; 101 U.S., 260.

441 Northern Pacific Railroad Company v.

Skelton, John; 4 L. D., 107

312 State of Minn; 11 C. L. 0., 75...

480
Slate v. Dorr; 2 L. D., 635.

424 Niswanger c. Saunders; 1 Wall., 438.. 157 Slidell v. Grandjean; 111 U. S., 413 132, 472 Nichols v. Benoit; 2 L. D. ,583...

Smelting Co. v. Kemp; 104 U. S., 636...... 363
Smith v. Brandes; 2 L. D., 95 ...... .242, 472, 518
Smith v. Martin; 2 L. D., 333..

239 O'Dea v. O'Dea; 2 L. D., 286.

86

Southern Minnesota Railway Ext. Co. v.
Olson v. Larson et al. ; 2 L. D., 501

404
Gallipean; 3L, D., 166

227 Oregon, State of; 3 L. D., 474

226

Southern Pacific Ralroad Company v.
Oregon, State of; 3 L. D., 595

252
Shorey; 11 C. L. O., 11

99 Osterman 1. Baldwin ; 6 Wall., 116

565

Southern Pacific Railroad Company u.
Eberle; 1 B. L.P., 63

100 Palmer v. Clevinger; 2 L. D., 56.

561
Spencer, Reuben; 3 L. D., 503

32 Papina v. Anderson ; 10 C. L. O., 52.

214
State of Florida; 10 C.L.O., 110..

76 Parker v. Castle; 4 L. D., 84.. .230, 537, 591

State of Nebraska v. Dorrington; 2 C. L. Pecard v. Cameus et al.; 4 L.D., 152.. 286, 438

L., 647..

78 Peck v. Taylor; 3 L. D., 372.

87
State of Ohio; 3 L. D., 572...

480 Pederson v. Johannessen ; 4 L. D., 343.... 552

State v. Whittemore; 50 N. H., 550 .

109 Peninsular Railroad Company v. Carlton

Stewart v. Jacobs; 1 C. L. L., 459..

436 & Steele; 2 L. D., 531..

150
Stone v. United States; 2 Wall., 535

7 People o. Cowell ; 60 Cal., 403.

372

Saint Lawrence and R. Mining CompaPierce o. Benson; 2 L. D., 319

471

nies v. Albion Mining Company; 4 L, D., Pine r. Wood; 1C. L. L., 703.

146
117.

376 Plugert v. Empoy; 2 L. D., 152.

167

Saint Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Pomeroy v. Wright; 2 L. D., 164. 23, 246, 465

Railway Company v. Paulsen ; 4 L. D., Postle v. Strickler; 2 L. D., 24..

232

405 Powers v. Forbes; 7 C. L.O., 149..

140, 561

Saint Paul Railroad Company v. Winona Pressy c. Northern Pacific Railroad Com.

Railroad Company; 112 U.S., 729...... 428 pany; 2 L D., 551 ....

23

Saint Paul and Sioux City Railroad ComProbst o. Whyte ; 10 C. L. O., 240..

23

pany v. United States; 3 L. D., 504..... 128 Pruitt v. Chadbourno; 3 L. D., 100

63, 259
Street, Willis F.; 2 L.D., 116..

345 Putnam, S. A.; 4 C. L. O., 140

311
Sutley, William R.; 3 L. D., 248

127

Sweeten v. Stevenson; 3 L. D., 249....... 86 Railroad Company v. Smith; 9 Wall., 05.. 549 Swift 0. California and Oregon Railroad Railroad Company v. Schoebe; 3 L. D., 183 559 Company; 2 C. L. O., 134

486 Rancho Alisal; 1 L. D., 198..

102 Rancho de La Purisima; 1 L. D., 234

95 Rancho San Rafael de la Zanja; 3 L. D., 438 432

Talkington's heirs v. Hempfling; 2 L.D., Randolph v. Barrett ; 16 Peters, 141...... 539 46, 173......

424 Repner, Sarah; 2 L. D., 43...

366, 447 The “Venus" Rae, Master; 8 Cranch, Reynolds v. Sampson; 2 L. D., 305 163 253

330 Rice v. Railroad Company; 1 Black, 330.. 429 Thomas v. Saint Joseph and Denver City Rico Townsite; 1 L. D., 567

214

Railroad Company; 3 C. L. O., 197...., 465 Rivers v. Burbank; 9C. L. O., 268. 165 Thompson v. Clark; 11 C.L. O., 24

136 Roberts v. Jepson; 4 L. D., 60. 478 Thompson v. Jacobson ; 2 L. D., 620

424 Robinson v. Royder; 1 L. D., 577.

495 | Thorpe et al. v. McWilliams; 3 L. D., 341. 506 Rowland v. Clemens ; 2 L. D., 633.. 165, 283 Tilton v. Price; 4 L. D., 123

506 Ryan v. Railroad Company; 99 U. S., 382.. 428 Tipton v. Hughes; 2 L. D., 331..

238 Ryan v. Conly; 4 L. D., 246 588 Townsend v. Spellman; 2 L. D., 77.

457 Ryan u. Stadler; 2 L. D., 86 Trelut, Ernest; 3 L D., 229

457

227

50.

« ForrigeFortsett »