 | Michigan - 1850 - 40 sider
...the final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal § 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Michigan. Constitutional Convention - 1850 - 990 sider
...final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal. Sec. 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Virginia - 1851 - 1348 sider
...his religious instructor, aud to make for his support such private contract as. be shall please. 16. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in it* title ; nor shall any law be revived or amended by reference to its title, but the act revived... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1907 - 792 sider
...that the law is unconstitutional, in that it violates section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution, which provides that no law shall embrace more than...object, which shall be expressed in its title. It is established by our decisions that, if what is introduced by way of an amendment to an act might have... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1902 - 806 sider
...§ 4262 et seq. It is contended that this is obnoxious to section 20, art. 4, of the Constitution, which provides that no law shall embrace more than...one object, which shall be expressed in its title. We think the act is not open to the objection raised. The general purpose of the act is to provide... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1890 - 784 sider
...4. It is claimed that the statute is unconstitutional, nnder Article 4, § 20, of the Constitution, which provides that no law shall embrace more than...one object, which shall be expressed in its title. The section of Howell's Statutes, 9175, was added to our criminal laws by Act No. 116, Laws of 1867.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1900 - 804 sider
...that the act is therefore in conflict with section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution of this State, which provides that "no law shall embrace more than...one object, which shall be expressed in its title. " We think this contention sufficiently answered by what was said by this court in Soukup v. Van Dyke,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1910 - 804 sider
...in this State," etc. It is claimed that this violates article 4, § 20, of the Constitution of 1850, which provides that no law shall embrace more than...one object, which shall be expressed in its title. There are many cases in which this court has declared that the effect of this constitutional provision... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1888 - 776 sider
...to this Court on exceptions. It is claimed that under section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution, which provides that " no law shall embrace more than...one object, which shall be expressed in its title," this section is invalid and void. The title to act 259, Laws 1881, reads : " An act to regulate the... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1893 - 788 sider
...Federal Constitution. c — It does not violate section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution of Michigan, which provides that no law shall embrace more than...one object, which shall be expressed in its title, in that it provides for the election of alternate electors, whereas the title relates only to choosing... | |
| |
No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title... 
